Frühbadener Elemente im Neolithikum Mitteldeutschlands: die "Schöninger Gruppe"

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 Arts and Humanities Archaologisches Korrespondenzblatt Pub Date : 2006-10-10 DOI:10.12766/JNA.2006.17
D. Raetzel-Fabian, Martin Furholt
{"title":"Frühbadener Elemente im Neolithikum Mitteldeutschlands: die \"Schöninger Gruppe\"","authors":"D. Raetzel-Fabian, Martin Furholt","doi":"10.12766/JNA.2006.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early Baden Elements in the Neolithic of Central Germany – the »Schoningen Group« Some cultural complexes still do not fit reliably into the  seemingly well-established chronology of the Mittelelbe-Saale-Region. One example is the enigmatic Schoningen pottery,  named after a settlement site in Lower Saxony. When R. Maier  presented the material in 1987, it could only be dated broadly to the Younger Neolithic due to an apparent lack of convincing  typological parallels. In 1993 J. Beran assigned several new  complexes (e.g. Salzmunde, Oberwerschen; both in Sachsen- Anhalt) to the »Schoningen group« as he called it then. Based on very general typological resemblances, he dated it to the  beginning of the Younger Neolithic, regarding it contemporary  with early Michelsberg (MK I / II; c. 4200 / 4000 B.C.). On the  whole the typochronological suggestion was followed by D.  Kaufmann in 1994. In this paper we point to the hitherto unrecognized fact that the Schoningen bowl, as the dominant and most characteristic type, is very closely related to early Baden (Boleraz) pottery. Furthermore, parallels for almost all other typological features can be found in Boleraz and to some extent in Altheim. Therefore Schoningen pottery can be placed in the context of Baalberge and perhaps early Salzmunde (c. 3700–3350 B.C.). We consider the Schoningen types not a cultural »group« sensu stricto, but a bundle of time-specific styles, resulting from a strong Boleraz and perhaps Altheim influence on the Mittelelbe-Saale-Region.","PeriodicalId":44872,"journal":{"name":"Archaologisches Korrespondenzblatt","volume":"154 1","pages":"347-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaologisches Korrespondenzblatt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12766/JNA.2006.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Early Baden Elements in the Neolithic of Central Germany – the »Schoningen Group« Some cultural complexes still do not fit reliably into the  seemingly well-established chronology of the Mittelelbe-Saale-Region. One example is the enigmatic Schoningen pottery,  named after a settlement site in Lower Saxony. When R. Maier  presented the material in 1987, it could only be dated broadly to the Younger Neolithic due to an apparent lack of convincing  typological parallels. In 1993 J. Beran assigned several new  complexes (e.g. Salzmunde, Oberwerschen; both in Sachsen- Anhalt) to the »Schoningen group« as he called it then. Based on very general typological resemblances, he dated it to the  beginning of the Younger Neolithic, regarding it contemporary  with early Michelsberg (MK I / II; c. 4200 / 4000 B.C.). On the  whole the typochronological suggestion was followed by D.  Kaufmann in 1994. In this paper we point to the hitherto unrecognized fact that the Schoningen bowl, as the dominant and most characteristic type, is very closely related to early Baden (Boleraz) pottery. Furthermore, parallels for almost all other typological features can be found in Boleraz and to some extent in Altheim. Therefore Schoningen pottery can be placed in the context of Baalberge and perhaps early Salzmunde (c. 3700–3350 B.C.). We consider the Schoningen types not a cultural »group« sensu stricto, but a bundle of time-specific styles, resulting from a strong Boleraz and perhaps Altheim influence on the Mittelelbe-Saale-Region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中德尼安德里亚山脉的早学元素:科尼格集团
德国中部新石器时代的早期巴登元素——“舍宁根群”一些文化综合体仍然不能可靠地符合貌似完善的mittelelbe - saale地区年表。一个例子是神秘的舍宁根陶器,以下萨克森州的一个定居点命名。当R. Maier在1987年提出这些材料时,由于明显缺乏令人信服的类型学上的相似之处,它只能大致追溯到新石器时代。1993年,J. Beran指定了几个新的综合体(例如Salzmunde, Oberwerschen;都在萨克森-安哈尔特)到他当时所说的“舍宁根集团”。基于非常普遍的类型学相似性,他将其追溯到新石器时代早期,与早期Michelsberg (MK I / II;公元前4200 / 4000年)。总的来说,D. Kaufmann在1994年遵循了排印时间的建议。在本文中,我们指出了一个迄今为止尚未认识到的事实,即Schoningen碗,作为主要和最具特色的类型,与早期巴登(Boleraz)陶器非常密切相关。此外,几乎所有其他类型的特征都可以在Boleraz和Altheim中找到相似之处。因此,Schoningen陶器可以被置于Baalberge和Salzmunde早期(公元前3700-3350年)的背景下。我们认为Schoningen类型不是一个严格意义上的文化“群体”,而是一束特定时间的风格,这是由Boleraz和Altheim对mittelelbe - saale地区的强烈影响造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt is a quarterly journal quickly informing the scientific community in short articles about new results in archaelogical research in Germany and other countries. The Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt has a profile as a topical scientific journal on issues of Prehistoric, Roman and Medieval archaeology and related sciences in Europe. Beside topical debates the journal provides a place for the publication of new finds and short analysis of general interest. The articles are up to 20 pages in print; contributions in foreign languages are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Zwei bemerkenswerte Hohlmaßsteine aus Brigantium / Bregenz: neue Erkenntnisse zur mensa ponderaria »Ein niedlicher Löwe mit starker Mähne« – zu einer Löwenfibel mit rhombischer Bügelplatte und kurzem schmalen Fuß aus Brigantium / Bregenz A Bronze Brooch Casting Mould in Eastern Bohemia from the Period of the Marcomannic Wars Wadenbindengarnitur mit Kriegerdarstellung – ein Neufund aus Rain am Lech (Lkr. Donau-Ries / D) Ein Nebengebäude mit umgestürzter Wand in der villa rustica Binger Wald (Gem. Weiler, Lkr. Mainz-Bingen / D)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1