Simplified Pneumococcal Vaccination Schedules for Adults Age 50 and Over Lead to Worse Health

C. Stoecker, L. Kim, R. Gierke, T. Pilishvili
{"title":"Simplified Pneumococcal Vaccination Schedules for Adults Age 50 and Over Lead to Worse Health","authors":"C. Stoecker, L. Kim, R. Gierke, T. Pilishvili","doi":"10.4172/2157-7560.1000373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In 2014 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approved a dose of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) for all adults at age 65 years. This further complicated the pneumococcal vaccination schedule, which was already one of the most complicated schedules. Objective: This study documents simplified schedules that were considered and discarded by the pneumococcal working group before making the most recent recommendation. We examined the marginal cost-effectiveness of several simplified schedules for older adults (age 50+ years) when compared with current recommendations. Our primary outcome was the cost-effectiveness ratio of quality-adjusted life years to cost. Methods: We used a probabilistic model following a cohort of 50 year-olds with separate vaccination coverage and disease incidence data for healthy adults and adults at increased risk of pneumococcal disease. We compared incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the schedule that was ultimately recommended with each potential simplified vaccination strategy. Results: Most schedules analyzed resulted in several hundred additional deaths. While several possible schedules resulted in cost savings, these cost savings were modest compared to the health costs associated with them. Conclusion: The schedule recommended by the ACIP in 2014, while complex, is the most health promoting compared to the modeled alternative schedules. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the current schedule when compared to simplified alternatives is comparable to other vaccine-related interventions.","PeriodicalId":17656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7560.1000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: In 2014 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approved a dose of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) for all adults at age 65 years. This further complicated the pneumococcal vaccination schedule, which was already one of the most complicated schedules. Objective: This study documents simplified schedules that were considered and discarded by the pneumococcal working group before making the most recent recommendation. We examined the marginal cost-effectiveness of several simplified schedules for older adults (age 50+ years) when compared with current recommendations. Our primary outcome was the cost-effectiveness ratio of quality-adjusted life years to cost. Methods: We used a probabilistic model following a cohort of 50 year-olds with separate vaccination coverage and disease incidence data for healthy adults and adults at increased risk of pneumococcal disease. We compared incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the schedule that was ultimately recommended with each potential simplified vaccination strategy. Results: Most schedules analyzed resulted in several hundred additional deaths. While several possible schedules resulted in cost savings, these cost savings were modest compared to the health costs associated with them. Conclusion: The schedule recommended by the ACIP in 2014, while complex, is the most health promoting compared to the modeled alternative schedules. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the current schedule when compared to simplified alternatives is comparable to other vaccine-related interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
50岁及以上成年人简化肺炎球菌疫苗接种时间表导致健康状况恶化
背景:2014年,免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)批准了一剂适用于所有65岁成人的13价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV13)。这进一步复杂化了肺炎球菌疫苗接种计划,这已经是最复杂的计划之一。目的:本研究记录了肺炎球菌工作组在提出最新建议之前考虑并放弃的简化时间表。我们比较了几种老年人(50岁以上)简化方案与当前推荐方案的边际成本效益。我们的主要结局是质量调整生命年与成本的成本-效果比。方法:我们使用了一个概率模型,对一组50岁的健康成人和肺炎球菌疾病风险增加的成年人进行了单独的疫苗接种覆盖率和疾病发病率数据。我们比较了最终推荐的时间表与每种可能的简化疫苗接种策略的增量成本-效果比。结果:分析的大多数时间表导致数百人额外死亡。虽然有几个可能的时间表节省了成本,但与与之相关的医疗费用相比,这些成本节省并不多。结论:2014年ACIP推荐的计划虽然复杂,但与模拟的替代计划相比,最能促进健康。与简化替代方案相比,当前计划的增量成本效益比与其他疫苗相关干预措施相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differential Transcription Profiling in Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Between Myasthenia Gravis Patients With or Without Thymoma Rapid screening for variants of concern in routine SARS-CoV-2 PCR diagnostics Mast Cells and COVID-19: a case report implicating a role of mast cell activation in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 Evaluating Child Malnutrition in Southern Belize Using an Anthropologic Screening Tool Sero-prevalence and risk factors for sheeppox in Kordofan states in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1