Biphasic Anaphylaxis: A Review of the Incidence, Characteristics and Predictors

A. Ellis
{"title":"Biphasic Anaphylaxis: A Review of the Incidence, Characteristics and Predictors","authors":"A. Ellis","doi":"10.2174/1874838401003010024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While it has been recognized for over a quarter century that anaphylactic reactions have the potential to follow a biphasic course, reports on the incidence of biphasic anaphylaxis are conflicting, and the search for reliable predictive factors of such responses has been challenging. Further adding to the complexity of this clinical entity are the widely vari- able durations of the asymptomatic window, and the similarly variable reports on second phase severity. This review aims to provide the health care professional with a better understanding of the true incidence, nature, and risk factors for this type of reactivity by consolidating and summarizing the available literature on the topic of biphasic anaphylaxis. As our body of evidence builds, patterns are emerging to suggest that those patients with an initial presentation requiring more than one dose of epinephrine, those who have life-threatening initial presenting features, and those who otherwise take longer to stabilize, are in this higher risk group, and would be more likely to benefit from prolonged in hospital observa- tion. Conversely, patients who respond rapidly to the immediate administration of epinephrine may be at lower risk, but this finding requires confirmation by others. Further prospective evaluations of biphasic anaphylaxis will greatly aid our understanding of this condition.","PeriodicalId":22835,"journal":{"name":"The Open Allergy Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"24-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Allergy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874838401003010024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

While it has been recognized for over a quarter century that anaphylactic reactions have the potential to follow a biphasic course, reports on the incidence of biphasic anaphylaxis are conflicting, and the search for reliable predictive factors of such responses has been challenging. Further adding to the complexity of this clinical entity are the widely vari- able durations of the asymptomatic window, and the similarly variable reports on second phase severity. This review aims to provide the health care professional with a better understanding of the true incidence, nature, and risk factors for this type of reactivity by consolidating and summarizing the available literature on the topic of biphasic anaphylaxis. As our body of evidence builds, patterns are emerging to suggest that those patients with an initial presentation requiring more than one dose of epinephrine, those who have life-threatening initial presenting features, and those who otherwise take longer to stabilize, are in this higher risk group, and would be more likely to benefit from prolonged in hospital observa- tion. Conversely, patients who respond rapidly to the immediate administration of epinephrine may be at lower risk, but this finding requires confirmation by others. Further prospective evaluations of biphasic anaphylaxis will greatly aid our understanding of this condition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双相过敏反应:发病率、特征和预测因素的综述
虽然人们已经认识到过敏反应有可能遵循双期病程,但关于双期过敏反应发生率的报告是相互矛盾的,并且寻找这种反应的可靠预测因素一直具有挑战性。无症状窗口期的持续时间差异很大,第二期严重程度的报告也存在类似的差异,这进一步增加了这一临床实体的复杂性。本综述旨在通过整合和总结关于双相过敏反应的现有文献,为卫生保健专业人员提供更好地了解这种反应性的真实发生率、性质和危险因素。随着我们的证据积累,模式正在出现,表明那些最初表现需要一次以上剂量肾上腺素的患者,那些有危及生命的最初表现特征的患者,以及那些需要更长的时间才能稳定的患者,属于这一高风险群体,并且更有可能从长期住院观察中受益。相反,对立即给予肾上腺素反应迅速的患者可能风险较低,但这一发现需要其他人的证实。进一步的前瞻性评估双相过敏反应将极大地帮助我们了解这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) are Risk Factors for Cryptococcosis Association Between Endoscopic, Radiologic and Patient-reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Food Allergy Knowledge and Attitudes Among School Teachers in Jazan, Saudi Arabia Anaphylaxis to Glatiramer Acetate Dynamics of Plasma and Granule Membrane in Murine Bone Marrow- Derived Mast Cells after Re-stimulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1