Soviet Politics of Memory in Southern Bessarabia and Northern Bukovyna: Representation of the Past and Mythmaking during World War II

Q2 Arts and Humanities Plural. History. Culture. Society Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.37710/plural.v10i2_4
V. Drozdov
{"title":"Soviet Politics of Memory in Southern Bessarabia and Northern Bukovyna: Representation of the Past and Mythmaking during World War II","authors":"V. Drozdov","doi":"10.37710/plural.v10i2_4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incorporation of new territories into the Ukrainian SSR during World War II required reconstructing the local community’s identity and shaping its historical memory through Stalinist ideology. This article examines the features of Soviet memory politics in Ukrainian territories through the examples of Southern Bessarabia and Northern Bukovyna, which were annexed in 1940 due to the military campaign against Romania. The study’s objectives were to determine the influence of Soviet ideology on the representation of the past, characterize the ways that the official memory was shaped during World War II, and analyze historical myths that spread throughout the official and historical discourse. The main historical images, which Soviet ideologists formulated in\nofficial statements, historical works, and propaganda in periodicals, have been extracted using historical discourse analysis. Comparative historical analysis has identified similarities and differences in interpreting the above-mentioned regions’ pasts. It is pointed out that the historical arguments and concepts used by the Soviet power to justify the annexations became the foundation for the historical discourse. The article analyzes the introduction of the myth of “longsuffering lands” into historical narratives, which interpreted the Soviet territorial conquests as the liberation of oppressed peoples. It has been established that the representation of Southern Bessarabia and Northern Bukovyna’s pasts corresponded to the Soviet concept of “Ukrainian people’s reunification.” However, the distinction between these regions’ ethnic composition and historical development influenced the politics of shaping historical memory.","PeriodicalId":36611,"journal":{"name":"Plural. History. Culture. Society","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plural. History. Culture. Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37710/plural.v10i2_4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The incorporation of new territories into the Ukrainian SSR during World War II required reconstructing the local community’s identity and shaping its historical memory through Stalinist ideology. This article examines the features of Soviet memory politics in Ukrainian territories through the examples of Southern Bessarabia and Northern Bukovyna, which were annexed in 1940 due to the military campaign against Romania. The study’s objectives were to determine the influence of Soviet ideology on the representation of the past, characterize the ways that the official memory was shaped during World War II, and analyze historical myths that spread throughout the official and historical discourse. The main historical images, which Soviet ideologists formulated in official statements, historical works, and propaganda in periodicals, have been extracted using historical discourse analysis. Comparative historical analysis has identified similarities and differences in interpreting the above-mentioned regions’ pasts. It is pointed out that the historical arguments and concepts used by the Soviet power to justify the annexations became the foundation for the historical discourse. The article analyzes the introduction of the myth of “longsuffering lands” into historical narratives, which interpreted the Soviet territorial conquests as the liberation of oppressed peoples. It has been established that the representation of Southern Bessarabia and Northern Bukovyna’s pasts corresponded to the Soviet concept of “Ukrainian people’s reunification.” However, the distinction between these regions’ ethnic composition and historical development influenced the politics of shaping historical memory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南比萨拉比亚和北布科维纳的苏维埃记忆政治:二战期间的历史再现和神话制造
在第二次世界大战期间,乌克兰苏维埃社会主义共和国将新领土纳入其中,需要重建当地社区的身份,并通过斯大林主义的意识形态塑造其历史记忆。本文以1940年因对罗马尼亚的军事行动而被吞并的南比萨拉比亚和北布科维纳为例,考察了苏联记忆政治在乌克兰领土上的特点。该研究的目的是确定苏联意识形态对历史再现的影响,描述二战期间官方记忆的形成方式,并分析在官方和历史话语中传播的历史神话。通过历史话语分析,提取了苏联意识形态家在非正式声明、历史著作和期刊宣传中形成的主要历史形象。比较历史分析发现了在解释上述地区的历史时的异同。文章指出,苏联政权用来为兼并辩护的历史论据和概念成为历史话语的基础。文章分析了在历史叙事中引入“苦难之地”神话,将苏联的领土征服解释为被压迫民族的解放。人们已经确定,对南部比萨拉比亚和北部布科维纳过去的描述符合苏联“乌克兰人民统一”的概念。然而,这些地区的民族构成和历史发展的差异影响了塑造历史记忆的政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plural. History. Culture. Society
Plural. History. Culture. Society Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transnational Migration in the Moldovan- German Context, or: My Totul va fi bine (Road)trip Liberal Democracy in Estonia: Cracks Behind the Seemingly Spotless Façade 1989 – Annus Mirabilis for The Moldavian SSR The Chronotopos of the 1990s: Trauma and Triumph in Georgian Literary Texts Review, Catherine Durandin, Cécile Folschweiller (coord.), Enfances communistes. Mémoires de Roumanie et de République de Moldavie (Paris: Editions PETRA, 2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1