Application of Machine Learning to Estimate Sonic Data for Seismic Well Ties, Bongkot Field, Thailand

N. Sukkee, T. Ketmalee, Nattapon Jalernsuk, Renaud Lemaire, P. Bandyopadhyay
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning to Estimate Sonic Data for Seismic Well Ties, Bongkot Field, Thailand","authors":"N. Sukkee, T. Ketmalee, Nattapon Jalernsuk, Renaud Lemaire, P. Bandyopadhyay","doi":"10.2118/197822-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Seismic well tie is a critical process to verify the time-depth relationship of a well. This process requires density and sonic transit time data. However, sonic logs are usually not acquired due to cost saving, unfavorable well path, or other operational issues. Attempts to generate synthetic logs by Gardner equation, porosity correlation, or depth correlation did not provide the required accuracy. Therefore, the goal of our project was to generate synthetic sonic logs using machine learning technique for seismic well ties. This paper will compare the different methods tested, compare the results and lists the advantages of using Machine Learning.\n This approach uses machine learning technique to create synthetic sonic logs. The machine learning model is trained to predict sonic log from other relevant logs. The model representativeness is confirmed by blind tests, which consists of two steps. The first step compares the synthetic sonic logs to the actual sonic logs. In the second step, four synthetic seismograms are generated from actual sonic, machine learning synthetic sonic, Gardner predicted sonic, and averaged constant sonic. The seismic well ties are compared between those four synthetic seismograms. Once the machine learning synthetic and actual logs show similar results, the model is deemed good and can be applied on wells that do not have sonic logs. The synthetic seismograms are then generated using synthetic sonic logs for all the wells that do not have actual sonic logs.\n The use of synthetic sonic logs gives us the ability to Generate synthetic seismogram to tie wells that do not have sonic dataReduce the number sonic data acquisition, saving time and moneyReduce the risk of long logging string getting stuck in the hole that would requires fishing operations and its associated cost.","PeriodicalId":11061,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","volume":"9 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197822-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic well tie is a critical process to verify the time-depth relationship of a well. This process requires density and sonic transit time data. However, sonic logs are usually not acquired due to cost saving, unfavorable well path, or other operational issues. Attempts to generate synthetic logs by Gardner equation, porosity correlation, or depth correlation did not provide the required accuracy. Therefore, the goal of our project was to generate synthetic sonic logs using machine learning technique for seismic well ties. This paper will compare the different methods tested, compare the results and lists the advantages of using Machine Learning. This approach uses machine learning technique to create synthetic sonic logs. The machine learning model is trained to predict sonic log from other relevant logs. The model representativeness is confirmed by blind tests, which consists of two steps. The first step compares the synthetic sonic logs to the actual sonic logs. In the second step, four synthetic seismograms are generated from actual sonic, machine learning synthetic sonic, Gardner predicted sonic, and averaged constant sonic. The seismic well ties are compared between those four synthetic seismograms. Once the machine learning synthetic and actual logs show similar results, the model is deemed good and can be applied on wells that do not have sonic logs. The synthetic seismograms are then generated using synthetic sonic logs for all the wells that do not have actual sonic logs. The use of synthetic sonic logs gives us the ability to Generate synthetic seismogram to tie wells that do not have sonic dataReduce the number sonic data acquisition, saving time and moneyReduce the risk of long logging string getting stuck in the hole that would requires fishing operations and its associated cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习在泰国Bongkot油田地震井系声波数据估计中的应用
地震井算是验证井的时间-深度关系的关键过程。这个过程需要密度和声波传输时间数据。然而,由于节省成本、不利的井眼轨迹或其他操作问题,通常不会获取声波测井数据。通过Gardner方程、孔隙度相关性或深度相关性生成合成测井曲线的尝试无法提供所需的精度。因此,我们项目的目标是利用机器学习技术生成地震井的合成声波测井。本文将比较不同的测试方法,比较结果并列出使用机器学习的优点。这种方法使用机器学习技术来创建合成声波测井。机器学习模型经过训练,可以从其他相关日志中预测声波日志。通过盲测验证模型的代表性,盲测分为两个步骤。第一步是将合成声波测井与实际声波测井进行比较。在第二步中,由实际声波、机器学习合成声波、Gardner预测声波和平均恒定声波生成四个合成地震图。比较了四种合成地震图的地震井连。一旦机器学习合成测井曲线和实际测井曲线显示出相似的结果,该模型就被认为是好的,可以应用于没有声波测井曲线的井。然后,对所有没有实际声波测井的井,使用合成声波测井生成合成地震图。使用合成声波测井,我们能够生成合成地震图来连接没有声波数据的井,减少了声波数据采集的次数,节省了时间和金钱,降低了长测井管柱卡在井眼中的风险,减少了打捞作业的风险,降低了相关成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lessons Learned from History-Matching the First Out-Of-Sequence Fracturing Field Test in North America Energy Saving Challenges and Opportunities in Upstream Operations using Value Methodology An Integrated Solution to Repair Multiple Shallow Leaks in Production Tubing – A Unique Single Trip Well Intervention Technique Openhole Completions as Recovery Case for Drilling Across Salt and High Pressure Floaters The Impact of Dynamic Filtration on Formation Testing in Low Mobility Carbonate Formations. Case Study: Lower Cretaceous Carbonate Reservoir in the UAE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1