DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDIZATION OF A TOOL TO MEASURE KNOWLEDGE OF LABOUR LAWS AMONG EMPLOYEES

IF 1.4 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS E & M Ekonomie a Management Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.15240/tul/001/2021-4-006
M. M. Sulphey, Awad Ali Alanzi, M. Klepek
{"title":"DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDIZATION OF A TOOL TO MEASURE KNOWLEDGE OF LABOUR LAWS AMONG EMPLOYEES","authors":"M. M. Sulphey, Awad Ali Alanzi, M. Klepek","doi":"10.15240/tul/001/2021-4-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Labour legislations provide guidelines to prevent unfair labour practices and organizational injustice. All employment and labour laws propose standards regarding wages, wellbeing, safety, and equitable treatment, which reduces conflicts. However, informational imbalances between employers and employees prevent employees from having adequate knowledge about labour legislation. Consequently, some employers treat employees inconsistently and that could be detrimental to them. A practical solution to this problem is making employees aware of the provisions of labour laws. As an initial step towards this, there is a definite need to assess employees’ awareness regarding labour laws. Nevertheless, there is a lack of a standardized tool to measure the knowledge level of labour legislation, which has impaired empirical examinations. Using randomly collected 346 samples from two different types of industries, the present study constructed and validated a tool to measure labour law knowledge. The study has followed a simple scale development framework consisting of item generation, scale development, and psychometric evaluation. The measurement tool has been developed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The final questionnaire consists of 17 items under four factors, exhibited significant reliability and validity. The developed tool is expected to fill the gap in the literature and stimulate further empirical research. The study also examined the difference in the knowledge level based on the demographics of the sample. The results show a significant difference between the knowledge levels based on gender, citizenship, type of industry, and qualifications. Future research directions are proposed at the end of the paper, together with the limitations of this study.","PeriodicalId":46351,"journal":{"name":"E & M Ekonomie a Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E & M Ekonomie a Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-4-006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Labour legislations provide guidelines to prevent unfair labour practices and organizational injustice. All employment and labour laws propose standards regarding wages, wellbeing, safety, and equitable treatment, which reduces conflicts. However, informational imbalances between employers and employees prevent employees from having adequate knowledge about labour legislation. Consequently, some employers treat employees inconsistently and that could be detrimental to them. A practical solution to this problem is making employees aware of the provisions of labour laws. As an initial step towards this, there is a definite need to assess employees’ awareness regarding labour laws. Nevertheless, there is a lack of a standardized tool to measure the knowledge level of labour legislation, which has impaired empirical examinations. Using randomly collected 346 samples from two different types of industries, the present study constructed and validated a tool to measure labour law knowledge. The study has followed a simple scale development framework consisting of item generation, scale development, and psychometric evaluation. The measurement tool has been developed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The final questionnaire consists of 17 items under four factors, exhibited significant reliability and validity. The developed tool is expected to fill the gap in the literature and stimulate further empirical research. The study also examined the difference in the knowledge level based on the demographics of the sample. The results show a significant difference between the knowledge levels based on gender, citizenship, type of industry, and qualifications. Future research directions are proposed at the end of the paper, together with the limitations of this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和标准化一种工具,以衡量员工对劳动法的了解
劳工立法提供了防止不公平劳工做法和组织不公正的准则。所有就业和劳动法都提出了有关工资、福利、安全和公平待遇的标准,从而减少了冲突。然而,雇主和雇员之间的信息不平衡使雇员无法充分了解劳工立法。因此,一些雇主对待员工不一致,这可能对他们有害。解决这个问题的一个实际办法是使雇员了解劳动法的规定。作为实现这一目标的第一步,确实需要评估雇员对劳动法的认识。然而,缺乏衡量劳工立法知识水平的标准化工具,这损害了实证检验。本研究随机抽取两类不同行业的346个样本,构建并验证了一个劳动法知识测度工具。本研究遵循一个简单的量表开发框架,包括项目生成、量表开发和心理测量评估。测量工具已开发利用探索性和验证性因素分析。最终问卷共有17个条目,包含4个因素,具有显著的信度和效度。开发的工具有望填补文献的空白,并激发进一步的实证研究。该研究还检查了基于样本人口统计数据的知识水平差异。结果显示,不同性别、国籍、行业类型和学历的知识水平存在显著差异。文章最后提出了未来的研究方向,并指出了本研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Discovering the mindsets of the luxury recycling phenomenon The importance of Industry 4.0 technologies when selecting an ERP system – An empirical study Has COVID-19 affected the organisational culture of non-governmental organisations? Applying an integrated data-driven weighting system – CoCoSo approach for financial performance evaluation of Fortune 500 companies Is banking and finance education producing sector-relevant personnel? Stakeholders’ psychological perceptions toward employment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1