Shih-Ming Chuang, Chao-Hung Wang, Sung-Chen Liu, M. Chien, Wei-Che Chen
{"title":"Efficacy of Combination of Insulin Glargine with either Metformin or Sulfonylurea in Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Shih-Ming Chuang, Chao-Hung Wang, Sung-Chen Liu, M. Chien, Wei-Che Chen","doi":"10.6890/IJGE.202005_14(2).0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although adding insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, evidence supporting specific regimens is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of combination therapy of insulin glargine with either sulfonylurea (SU) or metformin (Met) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes receiving ≥ 2 OADs. Methods: This was a 48-week prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with ≥ 2 OADs were randomized to the insulin glargine with Met (Met-group) or insulin glargine with SU (SU-group). Results: Mean glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) reduction were significant in the Met-group and SU-group (-1.42 ± 0.28% and -1.00 ± 0.28%, respectively), but no statistically significant difference between groups (-0.40 ± 0.3%, p = 0.234). There was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving A1C of < 7% (12.8% and 6.8%, respectively).Mean FPG reduced significantly in both groups (-120.3 ± 8.8 mg/dL and -90.2 ± 11.1mg/dL, respectively), with greater reductions in the Met-group (-34.8 ± 10.0mg/dL, p < 0.001). More proportions of patients in the Met-group achieved the FPG target of < 130 mg/dL (80.9% and 40.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). The percentages of patients experiencing episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia (Met-group: 23.4%, SU-group: 19.6%) and the percentages of nocturnal hypoglycemia (Met-group: 8.5%, SU-group: 6.5%) were similar among the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on ≥ 2 OADs, glycemic control was comparable among the two regimens.","PeriodicalId":50321,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gerontology","volume":"1 1","pages":"138-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.202005_14(2).0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although adding insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, evidence supporting specific regimens is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of combination therapy of insulin glargine with either sulfonylurea (SU) or metformin (Met) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes receiving ≥ 2 OADs. Methods: This was a 48-week prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with ≥ 2 OADs were randomized to the insulin glargine with Met (Met-group) or insulin glargine with SU (SU-group). Results: Mean glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) reduction were significant in the Met-group and SU-group (-1.42 ± 0.28% and -1.00 ± 0.28%, respectively), but no statistically significant difference between groups (-0.40 ± 0.3%, p = 0.234). There was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving A1C of < 7% (12.8% and 6.8%, respectively).Mean FPG reduced significantly in both groups (-120.3 ± 8.8 mg/dL and -90.2 ± 11.1mg/dL, respectively), with greater reductions in the Met-group (-34.8 ± 10.0mg/dL, p < 0.001). More proportions of patients in the Met-group achieved the FPG target of < 130 mg/dL (80.9% and 40.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). The percentages of patients experiencing episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia (Met-group: 23.4%, SU-group: 19.6%) and the percentages of nocturnal hypoglycemia (Met-group: 8.5%, SU-group: 6.5%) were similar among the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on ≥ 2 OADs, glycemic control was comparable among the two regimens.
期刊介绍:
The Journal aims to publish original research and review papers on all fields of geriatrics and gerontology, including those dealing with critical care and emergency medicine.
The IJGE aims to explore and clarify the medical science and philosophy in all fields of geriatrics and gerontology, including those in the emergency and critical care medicine. The IJGE is determined not only to be a professional journal in gerontology, but also a leading source of information for the developing field of geriatric emergency and critical care medicine. It is a pioneer in Asia.
Topics in the IJGE cover the advancement of diagnosis and management in urgent, serious and chronic intractable diseases in later life, preventive medicine, long-term care of disability, ethical issues in the diseased elderly and biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry involving diseases associated with age. We did not limit the territory to only critical or emergency condition inasmuch as chronic diseases are frequently brought about by inappropriate management of acute problems.