Efficacy of Combination of Insulin Glargine with either Metformin or Sulfonylurea in Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Gerontology Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.6890/IJGE.202005_14(2).0010
Shih-Ming Chuang, Chao-Hung Wang, Sung-Chen Liu, M. Chien, Wei-Che Chen
{"title":"Efficacy of Combination of Insulin Glargine with either Metformin or Sulfonylurea in Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Shih-Ming Chuang, Chao-Hung Wang, Sung-Chen Liu, M. Chien, Wei-Che Chen","doi":"10.6890/IJGE.202005_14(2).0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although adding insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, evidence supporting specific regimens is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of combination therapy of insulin glargine with either sulfonylurea (SU) or metformin (Met) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes receiving ≥ 2 OADs. Methods: This was a 48-week prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with ≥ 2 OADs were randomized to the insulin glargine with Met (Met-group) or insulin glargine with SU (SU-group). Results: Mean glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) reduction were significant in the Met-group and SU-group (-1.42 ± 0.28% and -1.00 ± 0.28%, respectively), but no statistically significant difference between groups (-0.40 ± 0.3%, p = 0.234). There was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving A1C of < 7% (12.8% and 6.8%, respectively).Mean FPG reduced significantly in both groups (-120.3 ± 8.8 mg/dL and -90.2 ± 11.1mg/dL, respectively), with greater reductions in the Met-group (-34.8 ± 10.0mg/dL, p < 0.001). More proportions of patients in the Met-group achieved the FPG target of < 130 mg/dL (80.9% and 40.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). The percentages of patients experiencing episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia (Met-group: 23.4%, SU-group: 19.6%) and the percentages of nocturnal hypoglycemia (Met-group: 8.5%, SU-group: 6.5%) were similar among the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on ≥ 2 OADs, glycemic control was comparable among the two regimens.","PeriodicalId":50321,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gerontology","volume":"1 1","pages":"138-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.202005_14(2).0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although adding insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, evidence supporting specific regimens is lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of combination therapy of insulin glargine with either sulfonylurea (SU) or metformin (Met) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes receiving ≥ 2 OADs. Methods: This was a 48-week prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with ≥ 2 OADs were randomized to the insulin glargine with Met (Met-group) or insulin glargine with SU (SU-group). Results: Mean glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) reduction were significant in the Met-group and SU-group (-1.42 ± 0.28% and -1.00 ± 0.28%, respectively), but no statistically significant difference between groups (-0.40 ± 0.3%, p = 0.234). There was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving A1C of < 7% (12.8% and 6.8%, respectively).Mean FPG reduced significantly in both groups (-120.3 ± 8.8 mg/dL and -90.2 ± 11.1mg/dL, respectively), with greater reductions in the Met-group (-34.8 ± 10.0mg/dL, p < 0.001). More proportions of patients in the Met-group achieved the FPG target of < 130 mg/dL (80.9% and 40.9%, respectively, p < 0.001). The percentages of patients experiencing episodes of symptomatic hypoglycemia (Met-group: 23.4%, SU-group: 19.6%) and the percentages of nocturnal hypoglycemia (Met-group: 8.5%, SU-group: 6.5%) were similar among the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on ≥ 2 OADs, glycemic control was comparable among the two regimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘精胰岛素联合二甲双胍或磺脲治疗控制不良的2型糖尿病的疗效观察
背景:虽然在口服降糖药(OADs)中加入甘精胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者有效,但缺乏支持特定方案的证据。本研究的目的是比较甘精胰岛素与磺脲(SU)或二甲双胍(Met)联合治疗接受≥2 oad的控制不良的2型糖尿病患者的疗效。方法:这是一项为期48周的前瞻性、开放标签、随机、平行试验。控制不良且oad≥2例的2型糖尿病患者随机分为甘精胰岛素联合Met组(Met组)或甘精胰岛素联合SU组(SU组)。结果:met组和su组平均糖化血红蛋白(A1C)降低显著(分别为-1.42±0.28%和-1.00±0.28%),组间差异无统计学意义(-0.40±0.3%,p = 0.234)。两组患者A1C < 7%的比例无差异(分别为12.8%和6.8%)。两组的平均FPG均显著降低(分别为-120.3±8.8 mg/dL和-90.2±11.1mg/dL), met组降低幅度更大(-34.8±10.0mg/dL, p < 0.001)。met组患者达到FPG < 130 mg/dL的比例更高(分别为80.9%和40.9%,p < 0.001)。两组患者出现症状性低血糖发作的比例(met组:23.4%,su组:19.6%)和夜间低血糖发作的比例(met组:8.5%,su组:6.5%)相似。结论:在2型糖尿病患者中,两种方案的血糖控制效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to publish original research and review papers on all fields of geriatrics and gerontology, including those dealing with critical care and emergency medicine. The IJGE aims to explore and clarify the medical science and philosophy in all fields of geriatrics and gerontology, including those in the emergency and critical care medicine. The IJGE is determined not only to be a professional journal in gerontology, but also a leading source of information for the developing field of geriatric emergency and critical care medicine. It is a pioneer in Asia. Topics in the IJGE cover the advancement of diagnosis and management in urgent, serious and chronic intractable diseases in later life, preventive medicine, long-term care of disability, ethical issues in the diseased elderly and biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry involving diseases associated with age. We did not limit the territory to only critical or emergency condition inasmuch as chronic diseases are frequently brought about by inappropriate management of acute problems.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Geriatric Assessment in Predicting Postoperative Morbidity after Laparoscopic Surgery in Older Patients: A Systematic Review Improving cognitive function in older adults through Mental Abacus Training: A Single-Arm Pilot Study The Association between Pulmonary Function and Metabolic Syndrome in Koreans: A Cross-Sectional Study Relationships of Thyroid Hormones in the Normal Range to Coronary Artery Disease in Different Age Groups Investigation of an Elder Abuse Case in a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1