Protection conferred by Delta and BA.1/BA.2 infection against BA.4/BA.5 infection and hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Nicole E Winchester, N. Shrestha, Priscilla Kim, L. G. Tereshchenko, M. Rothberg
{"title":"Protection conferred by Delta and BA.1/BA.2 infection against BA.4/BA.5 infection and hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Nicole E Winchester, N. Shrestha, Priscilla Kim, L. G. Tereshchenko, M. Rothberg","doi":"10.1101/2022.11.14.22282310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: SARS-CoV-2 immunity has declined with subsequent waves and accrual of viral mutations. In vitro studies raise concern for immune escape by BA.4/BA.5, and a study in Qatar showed moderate protection, but these findings have yet to be reproduced. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included individuals tested for COVID-19 by PCR during Delta or BA.1/BA.2 and retested during BA.4/BA.5. The preventable fraction (PF) was calculated as ratio of the infection/hospitalization rate for initially positive patients divided by infection/hospitalization rate for initially negative patients, stratified by age, and adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, and vaccination using logistic regression. Results: 20,987 patients met inclusion criteria. Prior Delta infection provided no protection against BA.4/BA.5 infection (Adjusted PF: 11.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-21.8); p=0.036) and minimal protection against hospitalization (Adjusted PF: 10.7% (95%CI, 4.9-21.7); p=0.003). In adjusted models, prior BA.1/BA.2 infection provided 45.9% (95%CI, 36.2-54.1) (p <0.001) protection against BA.4/BA.5 reinfection and 18.8% (95% CI, 10.3-28.3) (p<0.0001) protection against hospitalization. Up-to-date vaccination provided modest protection against reinfection with BA.4/BA.5 and hospitalization. Conclusions: Prior infection with BA.1/BA.2 and up-to-date vaccination provided modest protection against infection with BA.4/BA.5 and hospitalization, while prior Delta infection provided minimal protection against hospitalization, and no infection protection.","PeriodicalId":22572,"journal":{"name":"The Indonesian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indonesian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.14.22282310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 immunity has declined with subsequent waves and accrual of viral mutations. In vitro studies raise concern for immune escape by BA.4/BA.5, and a study in Qatar showed moderate protection, but these findings have yet to be reproduced. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included individuals tested for COVID-19 by PCR during Delta or BA.1/BA.2 and retested during BA.4/BA.5. The preventable fraction (PF) was calculated as ratio of the infection/hospitalization rate for initially positive patients divided by infection/hospitalization rate for initially negative patients, stratified by age, and adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, and vaccination using logistic regression. Results: 20,987 patients met inclusion criteria. Prior Delta infection provided no protection against BA.4/BA.5 infection (Adjusted PF: 11.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-21.8); p=0.036) and minimal protection against hospitalization (Adjusted PF: 10.7% (95%CI, 4.9-21.7); p=0.003). In adjusted models, prior BA.1/BA.2 infection provided 45.9% (95%CI, 36.2-54.1) (p <0.001) protection against BA.4/BA.5 reinfection and 18.8% (95% CI, 10.3-28.3) (p<0.0001) protection against hospitalization. Up-to-date vaccination provided modest protection against reinfection with BA.4/BA.5 and hospitalization. Conclusions: Prior infection with BA.1/BA.2 and up-to-date vaccination provided modest protection against infection with BA.4/BA.5 and hospitalization, while prior Delta infection provided minimal protection against hospitalization, and no infection protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delta和BA.1/BA提供的保护。2 .感染BA.4/BA。感染和住院:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:SARS-CoV-2的免疫力随着病毒突变的增加而下降。体外研究引起了对BA.4/BA免疫逃逸的关注。卡塔尔的一项研究显示出适度的保护作用,但这些发现尚未被复制。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了在Delta或BA.1/BA期间用PCR检测COVID-19的个体。并在BA.4/BA.5期间重新测试。可预防分数(PF)的计算方法为初始阳性患者的感染/住院率除以初始阴性患者的感染/住院率,按年龄分层,并使用logistic回归对年龄、性别、合并症和疫苗接种进行调整。结果:20,987例患者符合纳入标准。先前的德尔塔病毒感染对BA.4/BA没有保护作用。5例感染(校正PF: 11.9%(95%可信区间[CI], 0.8-21.8);p=0.036)和最低限度的住院防护(校正PF: 10.7% (95%CI, 4.9-21.7);p = 0.003)。在调整后的模型中,先前BA.1/BA。2感染对BA.4/BA有45.9% (95%CI, 36.2-54.1) (p <0.001)的保护作用。5例再感染和18.8% (95% CI, 10.3-28.3) (p<0.0001)的住院保护。最新的疫苗接种提供了对BA.4/BA再感染的适度保护。5、住院。结论:既往感染BA.1/BA。2和最新的疫苗接种提供了对BA.4/BA感染的适度保护。而先前的德尔塔感染对住院提供了最低限度的保护,并且没有感染保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gambaran Infeksi Soil Transmitted Helminth pada Petani Penyitas Erupsi Gunung Semeru Pencegahan Phlebitis dengan Tindakan Flushing: Literature Review Burden of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute respiratory infections during pregnancy. The Role of Fibrinogen on Abortion Incidence in Pregnant Women with Toxoplasmosis Hubungan Faktor Pelayanan Pertama Masyarakat Pada Warga Yang Terpapar Covid Dengan Kesiapan Beradaptasi Pada COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1