Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Devletçilik: Ahmet Ağaoğlu ve Kadro Hareketi

Şebnem Korkmaz
{"title":"Erken Cumhuriyet Döneminde Devletçilik: Ahmet Ağaoğlu ve Kadro Hareketi","authors":"Şebnem Korkmaz","doi":"10.25272/icps.659042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There were many different views on how the development would take place between the years 1923-1946, which is called the Early Republican period. One of them can be defined as the liberal approach to statism that prioritizes the individual, while the other can be expressed as a fully interventionist understanding of statism that sees national interests as superior to individual interests. For example, between 1932-1933, there were long debates on the principles of statism between Ahmet Ağaoğlu who was active in the determination of liberal policies, and the Kadro Movement which was a product of the Marxist tradition. Ahmet Ağaoğlu was not only an intellectual but also an advocate of liberal nationalism in the political field as an active participant. The Kadro movement, which approached Kemalism from a socialist perspective, argued that the state needs to be active in all fields for national interests. In this study, the understanding of statism has been tried to be examined with the liberal perspective of Ağaoğlu and the full interventionist approach of the Kadro movement, contrary to many different interpretations. The Republic of Turkey, which replaced the Ottoman Empire, has tried various economic policies to revive the economy that crumbled in the previous wars. Particularly, the debates between the Kadro movement from Marxist tradition and Ağaoğlu from the liberal nationalist wing were effective in the adoption of the mixed economy system, which did not refuse private investments but also put the state into the active role after the 1929 Economic Depression.","PeriodicalId":38327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25272/icps.659042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There were many different views on how the development would take place between the years 1923-1946, which is called the Early Republican period. One of them can be defined as the liberal approach to statism that prioritizes the individual, while the other can be expressed as a fully interventionist understanding of statism that sees national interests as superior to individual interests. For example, between 1932-1933, there were long debates on the principles of statism between Ahmet Ağaoğlu who was active in the determination of liberal policies, and the Kadro Movement which was a product of the Marxist tradition. Ahmet Ağaoğlu was not only an intellectual but also an advocate of liberal nationalism in the political field as an active participant. The Kadro movement, which approached Kemalism from a socialist perspective, argued that the state needs to be active in all fields for national interests. In this study, the understanding of statism has been tried to be examined with the liberal perspective of Ağaoğlu and the full interventionist approach of the Kadro movement, contrary to many different interpretations. The Republic of Turkey, which replaced the Ottoman Empire, has tried various economic policies to revive the economy that crumbled in the previous wars. Particularly, the debates between the Kadro movement from Marxist tradition and Ağaoğlu from the liberal nationalist wing were effective in the adoption of the mixed economy system, which did not refuse private investments but also put the state into the active role after the 1929 Economic Depression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于1923年至1946年这段被称为早期共和时期的发展,有很多不同的观点。其中一种可以被定义为优先考虑个人利益的自由主义国家主义,而另一种可以被表达为对国家主义的完全干预主义理解,认为国家利益高于个人利益。例如,在1932-1933年间,在决定自由主义政策的艾哈迈德Ağaoğlu和马克思主义传统的产物卡德罗运动之间,就国家主义的原则进行了长时间的辩论。艾哈迈德Ağaoğlu不仅是知识分子,还是政治领域的自由民族主义倡导者和积极参与者。从社会主义的角度接近凯末尔主义的卡德罗运动主张,为了国家利益,国家需要在所有领域都发挥积极作用。在本研究中,与许多不同的解释相反,我们试图用Ağaoğlu的自由主义观点和Kadro运动的全面干预主义方法来检验对国家主义的理解。取代奥斯曼帝国的土耳其共和国尝试了各种经济政策,以恢复在以前的战争中崩溃的经济。特别是,来自马克思主义传统的卡德罗运动和来自自由民族主义派别的Ağaoğlu之间的辩论在采用混合经济制度方面是有效的,这种制度不拒绝私人投资,但在1929年经济大萧条之后,国家发挥了积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies
International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Politikayı Yeniden Düşünmenin Bir İmkânı Olarak Jacques Rancière’de Politik Özneleşme Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Afet Yönetimindeki Rolü: 6 Şubat Depremi Hatay Örneği Türkiye İşçi Partisi’nin İnşa ve Gelişimini Tetikleyen Koşullar (1960 – 1966) Adil Düzen Kavramı Bağlamında Necmettin Erbakan’ın Dış Politika Anlayışı Alimcan Ablet, Çin-İsrail İlişkileri, İstanbul: İyidüşün Yayınları, (Mayıs 2021), ss. 208.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1