Factors Affecting Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation Accuracy in Low Birth Weight Newborns

Nevin Tuten, O. Guralp, K. Gok, A. Tuten, A. Gezer
{"title":"Factors Affecting Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation Accuracy in Low Birth Weight Newborns","authors":"Nevin Tuten, O. Guralp, K. Gok, A. Tuten, A. Gezer","doi":"10.21613/GORM.2021.1157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of fetal weight estimation made by the last prenatal ultrasound measurement in low birth weight newborns (<2500 g). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1082 women were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic and clinical information of the mother and newborn and obstetric ultrasonography measurements and findings performed in the last week before birth were recorded. Accuracy of fetal weight estimation and parameters affecting it was investigated. RESULTS: Accurate estimation rates were lower in the term compared to the preterm delivery group; and in the SGA group compared to the AGA group (respectively, p=0.016, p=0.032). Accurate estimation rates (p=0.182) were comparable between the 500-1500 g and 1501-2500 g subgroups. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that gestational age at birth, birth weight, examination during labor, and duration between examination to delivery were statistically significant for the accurate estimation(p=0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimation rates were lower in the term compared to the preterm delivery group, and in the SGA group compared to the AGA group. The factors affecting accurate estimation were found to be gestational age at birth, birth weight, examination during labor, and duration between examination to delivery.","PeriodicalId":93778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21613/GORM.2021.1157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of fetal weight estimation made by the last prenatal ultrasound measurement in low birth weight newborns (<2500 g). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1082 women were evaluated in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic and clinical information of the mother and newborn and obstetric ultrasonography measurements and findings performed in the last week before birth were recorded. Accuracy of fetal weight estimation and parameters affecting it was investigated. RESULTS: Accurate estimation rates were lower in the term compared to the preterm delivery group; and in the SGA group compared to the AGA group (respectively, p=0.016, p=0.032). Accurate estimation rates (p=0.182) were comparable between the 500-1500 g and 1501-2500 g subgroups. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that gestational age at birth, birth weight, examination during labor, and duration between examination to delivery were statistically significant for the accurate estimation(p=0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimation rates were lower in the term compared to the preterm delivery group, and in the SGA group compared to the AGA group. The factors affecting accurate estimation were found to be gestational age at birth, birth weight, examination during labor, and duration between examination to delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响低出生体重新生儿超声胎儿体重估计准确性的因素
目的:探讨低出生体重新生儿(<2500 g)最后一次产前超声测量胎儿体重的准确性。研究设计:本回顾性队列研究共对1082名妇女进行评估。记录产妇和新生儿的人口学和临床信息以及产前最后一周的产科超声检查结果。探讨了胎儿体重估计的准确性及其影响因素。结果:与早产组相比,足月的准确估计率较低;与AGA组比较(p=0.016, p=0.032)。500-1500 g和1501-2500 g亚组的准确估计率(p=0.182)具有可比性。多元线性回归分析显示,出生胎龄、出生体重、产程检查、产程检查至分娩间隔时间的准确估计具有统计学意义(p=0.001)。结论:足月组的准确估计率低于早产组,SGA组的准确估计率低于AGA组。影响准确估计的因素包括出生时胎龄、出生体重、产程检查和检查至分娩的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delayed Presentation of Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich Syndrome; A Rare Congenital Anomaly: A Case Report and literature Review Prevalence and Determinants of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Burundi: Evidence from 2016-17 Demographic and Health Survey Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Recognizing Infected Patients with Organ Dysfunction & Prediction of Mortality: Cohort Study Prenatal Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Fetal Cardiac Tumors Association of Pharmacy Services with Patient Satisfaction in Public and Private Tertiary Care Hospitals of Rawalpindi And Islamabad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1