Informal Long Term Care in China and Population Ageing: Evidence and Policy Implications

IF 0.4 Q4 DEMOGRAPHY Population Review Pub Date : 2015-06-24 DOI:10.1353/prv.2015.a591657
Bei Lu, Xiaoting Liu, J. Piggott
{"title":"Informal Long Term Care in China and Population Ageing: Evidence and Policy Implications","authors":"Bei Lu, Xiaoting Liu, J. Piggott","doi":"10.1353/prv.2015.a591657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long-term care (LTC) policy in China is in its infancy, and it is highly decentralised. Where policy structures exist, they are poorly resourced. Although China’s demography is still young by developed country standards, it is ageing very rapidly, and by mid-century will have “caught up” with many countries in the developed world with respect to population ageing. LTC policy development, therefore, is becoming a priority in China. We argue that it should be formulated with population ageing as a framework. Policy designs, which take account of and encourage, informal care provision, will be critical to the fiscally sustainable delivery of LTC. In China, informal care is sometimes seen as very scarce because of the one child policy. With only one child, it is argued, there will be less informal care offered than in societies with larger families. This paper uses the recently developed China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) dataset to analyse the current patterns of disability and informal care availability. In particular, and contrary to expectation, we find that fertility change is not the main driver for reducing informal care. Education levels, living standards, urbanization and co-residency are much more important. This suggests that current policy, which targets those with one child families, may be misguided, and also that mechanical extrapolations of future demand for care may be misleading.","PeriodicalId":43131,"journal":{"name":"Population Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prv.2015.a591657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Long-term care (LTC) policy in China is in its infancy, and it is highly decentralised. Where policy structures exist, they are poorly resourced. Although China’s demography is still young by developed country standards, it is ageing very rapidly, and by mid-century will have “caught up” with many countries in the developed world with respect to population ageing. LTC policy development, therefore, is becoming a priority in China. We argue that it should be formulated with population ageing as a framework. Policy designs, which take account of and encourage, informal care provision, will be critical to the fiscally sustainable delivery of LTC. In China, informal care is sometimes seen as very scarce because of the one child policy. With only one child, it is argued, there will be less informal care offered than in societies with larger families. This paper uses the recently developed China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) dataset to analyse the current patterns of disability and informal care availability. In particular, and contrary to expectation, we find that fertility change is not the main driver for reducing informal care. Education levels, living standards, urbanization and co-residency are much more important. This suggests that current policy, which targets those with one child families, may be misguided, and also that mechanical extrapolations of future demand for care may be misleading.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国非正式长期护理与人口老龄化:证据与政策启示
中国的长期护理(LTC)政策还处于起步阶段,而且高度分散。在存在政策结构的地方,它们缺乏资源。虽然按照发达国家的标准,中国的人口结构还很年轻,但老龄化速度非常快,到本世纪中叶,中国在人口老龄化方面将“赶上”许多发达国家。因此,LTC政策的制定正在成为中国的优先事项。我们认为,它应该制定与人口老龄化作为一个框架。考虑到并鼓励非正规护理提供的政策设计对于长期医疗服务的财政可持续提供至关重要。在中国,由于独生子女政策,非正规护理有时被视为非常稀缺。有人认为,与大家庭相比,只有一个孩子的社会提供的非正式照顾会更少。本文使用最近开发的中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)数据集来分析当前残疾和非正式护理可用性的模式。特别是,与预期相反,我们发现生育率的变化并不是减少非正式护理的主要驱动力。教育水平、生活水平、城市化和共同居住更为重要。这表明,目前针对独生子女家庭的政策可能被误导了,而且对未来护理需求的机械推断也可能具有误导性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Population Review
Population Review DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Population Review publishes scholarly research that covers a broad range of social science disciplines, including demography, sociology, social anthropology, socioenvironmental science, communication, and political science. The journal emphasizes empirical research and strives to advance knowledge on the interrelationships between demography and sociology. The editor welcomes submissions that combine theory with solid empirical research. Articles that are of general interest to population specialists are also desired. International in scope, the journal’s focus is not limited by geography. Submissions are encouraged from scholars in both the developing and developed world. Population Review publishes original articles and book reviews. Content is published online immediately after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Capital and Cohesion: A new perspective on the analysis of mortality differentials Disparities in Health Insurance and the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Sexuality, and Gender Identity Regional Innovation and Economic Transformation A Micro-Sociology of an Emerging Global City: Miami Third-child Fertility Intention in Morocco: Analysis of Determinants Using a Gender-intersectional Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1