Individual or Enterprise Liability? The Roles of Sanctions and Liability Under Contractible and Non-contractible Safety Efforts

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Review of Law & Economics Pub Date : 2020-03-26 DOI:10.1515/rle-2016-0068
S. Grepperud
{"title":"Individual or Enterprise Liability? The Roles of Sanctions and Liability Under Contractible and Non-contractible Safety Efforts","authors":"S. Grepperud","doi":"10.1515/rle-2016-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyzes the social effectiveness of fines (sanctions) and awards (liability) where accident risks are influenced by decisions made by both the enterprise and the employees of the enterprise (individuals). The regulator observes a proportion of accidents and the safety decision of the individual can be contractible or non-contractible for the enterprise. All sanction regimes yield the first best, given contractible individual care. The liability regimes, however, produce sub-optimal solutions. Given non-contractible individual care, the combined use of an individual sanction and an enterprise sanction (joint use) produces the first best. The exclusive use of an individual sanction produces the first best if the enterprise does not suffer any direct harm. The exclusive use of an enterprise sanction does not, however, produce the first best. If both decision-makers are solvent and have similar liability probabilities, then individual and enterprise liability do equally well under contractible individual care. Individual liability does, however, best for non-contractible individual care.","PeriodicalId":44795,"journal":{"name":"Review of Law & Economics","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2016-0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the social effectiveness of fines (sanctions) and awards (liability) where accident risks are influenced by decisions made by both the enterprise and the employees of the enterprise (individuals). The regulator observes a proportion of accidents and the safety decision of the individual can be contractible or non-contractible for the enterprise. All sanction regimes yield the first best, given contractible individual care. The liability regimes, however, produce sub-optimal solutions. Given non-contractible individual care, the combined use of an individual sanction and an enterprise sanction (joint use) produces the first best. The exclusive use of an individual sanction produces the first best if the enterprise does not suffer any direct harm. The exclusive use of an enterprise sanction does not, however, produce the first best. If both decision-makers are solvent and have similar liability probabilities, then individual and enterprise liability do equally well under contractible individual care. Individual liability does, however, best for non-contractible individual care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人责任还是企业责任?可承包和不可承包安全措施下的制裁和责任的作用
摘要本文分析了事故风险受到企业和企业员工(个人)共同决策影响的罚款(制裁)和奖励(责任)的社会有效性。监管机构观察到一定比例的事故,个人的安全决策对企业来说可以是可承包的,也可以是不可承包的。考虑到可收缩的个人护理,所有制裁制度都能产生最佳效果。然而,责任制度产生了次优的解决方案。鉴于非收缩性个人护理,个人制裁和企业制裁的联合使用(联合使用)产生最佳效果。如果企业不遭受任何直接损害,单独使用个人制裁会产生最佳效果。然而,只使用企业制裁并不能产生最好的结果。如果两个决策者都是有偿付能力的,并且有相似的责任概率,那么在可收缩的个人护理下,个人责任和企业责任表现同样良好。然而,个人责任确实最适用于非合同个人护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
On the Role of Sales Taxes for Efficient Compensation of Property Loss Under Strict Liability Broadband Internet and Crime Unraveling the Peltzman Effect: The Significance of Agent’s Type Do US State Breach Notification Laws Decrease Firm Data Breaches? Anonymity and Online Search: Measuring the Privacy Impact Of Google’s 2012 Privacy Policy Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1