Metformin Use Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Veterans With Diabetes Hospitalized With Pneumonia.

T. Mohammed, M. Bowe, Alexandria N Plant, M. Perez, Carlos Álvarez, E. Mortensen
{"title":"Metformin Use Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Veterans With Diabetes Hospitalized With Pneumonia.","authors":"T. Mohammed, M. Bowe, Alexandria N Plant, M. Perez, Carlos Álvarez, E. Mortensen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4107159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nRecent studies suggest that metformin use may be associated with improved infectious disease-related outcomes, whereas other papers suggest potentially worse outcomes in serious bacterial infections. Our purpose was to examine the association of prior outpatient prescription of metformin on 30- and 90-day mortality for older veterans with pre-existing diabetes hospitalized with pneumonia.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using national Department of Veterans Affairs data of patients ≥65 years with a prior history of diabetes who were hospitalized with pneumonia over a 10-year period (fiscal years 2002-2012.) For our primary analysis, we created a propensity score and matched metformin users to nonusers 1:1.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe identified 34 759 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 20.3% of whom were prescribed metformin. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was 9.6% for those who received metformin versus 13.9% in nonusers (P < .003), and 90-day mortality was 15.8% for those who received metformin versus 23.0% for nonusers (P < .0001). For the propensity score model, we matched 6899 metformin users to 6899 nonusers. After propensity matching, both 30-day (relative risk [RR]: .86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .78-.95) and 90-day (RR: .85; 95% CI: .79-.92) mortality was significantly lower for metformin users.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nPrior receipt of metformin was associated with significantly lower mortality after adjusting for potential confounders. Additional research is needed to examine the safety and potential benefits of metformin use in patients with respiratory infections.","PeriodicalId":10421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4107159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND Recent studies suggest that metformin use may be associated with improved infectious disease-related outcomes, whereas other papers suggest potentially worse outcomes in serious bacterial infections. Our purpose was to examine the association of prior outpatient prescription of metformin on 30- and 90-day mortality for older veterans with pre-existing diabetes hospitalized with pneumonia. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using national Department of Veterans Affairs data of patients ≥65 years with a prior history of diabetes who were hospitalized with pneumonia over a 10-year period (fiscal years 2002-2012.) For our primary analysis, we created a propensity score and matched metformin users to nonusers 1:1. RESULTS We identified 34 759 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 20.3% of whom were prescribed metformin. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was 9.6% for those who received metformin versus 13.9% in nonusers (P < .003), and 90-day mortality was 15.8% for those who received metformin versus 23.0% for nonusers (P < .0001). For the propensity score model, we matched 6899 metformin users to 6899 nonusers. After propensity matching, both 30-day (relative risk [RR]: .86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .78-.95) and 90-day (RR: .85; 95% CI: .79-.92) mortality was significantly lower for metformin users. CONCLUSIONS Prior receipt of metformin was associated with significantly lower mortality after adjusting for potential confounders. Additional research is needed to examine the safety and potential benefits of metformin use in patients with respiratory infections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用二甲双胍可降低因肺炎住院的糖尿病退伍军人的死亡率
最近的研究表明,二甲双胍的使用可能与改善传染病相关的结果有关,而其他论文则认为严重细菌感染的结果可能更差。我们的目的是检查先前门诊处方二甲双胍与老年退伍军人既往糖尿病合并肺炎住院30天和90天死亡率的关系。方法:采用美国退伍军人事务部(Department of Veterans Affairs)的数据,对≥65岁、既往有糖尿病病史的10年间(2002-2012财政年度)因肺炎住院的患者进行回顾性队列研究。对于我们的主要分析,我们创建了一个倾向评分,并将二甲双胍使用者与非使用者1:1匹配。结果符合纳入标准的患者34 759例,其中处方二甲双胍的占20.3%。接受二甲双胍治疗的患者未经调整的30天死亡率为9.6%,而未使用二甲双胍的患者为13.9% (P < 0.003);接受二甲双胍治疗的患者90天死亡率为15.8%,而未使用二甲双胍的患者为23.0% (P < 0.0001)。对于倾向评分模型,我们将6899名二甲双胍使用者与6899名非二甲双胍使用者进行匹配。倾向匹配后,两组患者30天(相对危险度[RR]: 0.86;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.78 - 0.95)和90天(RR: 0.85;95% CI: 0.79 - 0.92),二甲双胍使用者的死亡率显著降低。结论:在调整潜在混杂因素后,先前接受二甲双胍治疗与显著降低死亡率相关。需要进一步的研究来检验二甲双胍用于呼吸道感染患者的安全性和潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mass tuberculosis screening among the elderly: A population-based study in a well-confined rural county in eastern China. High-level Colonization With Antibiotic-Resistant Enterobacterales Among Individuals in a Semi-Urban Setting in South India: An Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) Study. Timing and Predictors of Loss of Infectivity among Healthcare Workers with Primary and Recurrent COVID-19: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study No immunological interference or safety concerns when adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine is coadministered with a COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccine in adults aged 50 years and older: A randomized trial Metformin Use Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Veterans With Diabetes Hospitalized With Pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1