The Application of s 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) to Claims-Made Insurance Policies: An Analysis of Recent Developments

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Connecticut Insurance Law Journal Pub Date : 2014-04-01 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3250246
R. Bowley
{"title":"The Application of s 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) to Claims-Made Insurance Policies: An Analysis of Recent Developments","authors":"R. Bowley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3250246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the litigation over the collapsed Bridgecorp Group in New Zealand since 2011, the application of s 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) and s 9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 (NZ) to claims-made policies has been the focus of considerable interest. Through a review of recent case law, this article examines how the courts in Australia and New Zealand have grappled with the application of these arguably antiquated provisions to the complexities of modern professional indemnity and directors and officers insurance policies.","PeriodicalId":29865,"journal":{"name":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connecticut Insurance Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3250246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the litigation over the collapsed Bridgecorp Group in New Zealand since 2011, the application of s 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) and s 9 of the Law Reform Act 1936 (NZ) to claims-made policies has been the focus of considerable interest. Through a review of recent case law, this article examines how the courts in Australia and New Zealand have grappled with the application of these arguably antiquated provisions to the complexities of modern professional indemnity and directors and officers insurance policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1946年法律改革(杂项规定)法(NSW)第6条对索赔保险单的适用:对最近发展的分析
自2011年以来,在新西兰对Bridgecorp集团倒闭的诉讼之后,1946年法律改革(杂项规定)法案(NSW)第6条和1936年法律改革法案(NZ)第9条对索赔政策的适用一直是相当感兴趣的焦点。通过对最近的判例法的回顾,本文考察了澳大利亚和新西兰的法院如何努力将这些可以说是过时的条款应用于现代专业赔偿和董事和高级管理人员保险政策的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demand for Health Insurance in the Time of COVID-19: Evidence from the Special Enrollment Period in the Washington State ACA Marketplace Licensing the Insured: Providing Driver Licenses to Unauthorized Immigrants Has Not Impacted Auto Insurance in California Terrorism Risk Insurance Act: Time to Renew . . . or Rethink? Loss of ‘Unattended Property in a Public Place’ – Testing the Good Faith of the Travel Insurer The Insurance Business in Transition to the Physical-Cyber Market: Communication, Coordination and Harmonization of Cyber Risk Coverages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1