Risk behaviors related agrochemical use among rubber farmers in Southern of Thailand

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Research in Education Sciences Pub Date : 2014-07-01 DOI:10.15527/EJRE.201426254
Buppha Raksanam, A. Songthap, Nongnart Suklim
{"title":"Risk behaviors related agrochemical use among rubber farmers in Southern of Thailand","authors":"Buppha Raksanam, A. Songthap, Nongnart Suklim","doi":"10.15527/EJRE.201426254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study objective was to evaluate the knowledge, beliefs and behaviors regarding agrochemical safety behaviors among farmers among farmers in the Khogyang community, Trang province, Thailand between the period September and December 2012. The principles of Health Belief Model and community participatory approach were applied to develop a comprehensive strategy to reduce agrochemical risk their behavior. 316 farmers from 8 villages in Khogyang community were recruited. The mean scores of the 3 variables (knowledge, belief and behavior) regarding agrochemical safety were measured. The results revealed that knowledge of farmer participants on agrochemical use was observed at low level. The level of overall belief regarding agrochemical safety was observed at moderate level. The mean scores of perceived susceptibility, seriousness, barriers, and benefits of agrochemical safety were 3.85 + 0.74, 3.52 + 0.56, 3.61+0.39 and 3.66+0.96, respectively. Behavior of farmer participants on agrochemical safety was also observed at moderate level. There were positive statistically significant correlations between knowledge and behavior scores; and overall belief and behavior scores (r = 0.336 and 0.621, respectively). In addition, statistically significant predictive variables associated agrochemical safety behavior were knowledge and belief on agrochemical use (Beta = 0.120 and 0. 0.576, respectively). These predictors accounted for 39.80 percents of variance. All predictors were positively related to agrochemical use behavior. The most common of agrochemicals use in the Kogyang community was “Glyphosate”. Health risk behaviors regarding agrochemical use were lack of attention to safety precautions and the use of inappropriate protective gear. These are an elementary guide that is useful in introducing the ideas of community involvement in agrochemical safety behaviors © 2013 European Journal of Research on Education by IASSR.","PeriodicalId":43604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Education Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"109-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15527/EJRE.201426254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The study objective was to evaluate the knowledge, beliefs and behaviors regarding agrochemical safety behaviors among farmers among farmers in the Khogyang community, Trang province, Thailand between the period September and December 2012. The principles of Health Belief Model and community participatory approach were applied to develop a comprehensive strategy to reduce agrochemical risk their behavior. 316 farmers from 8 villages in Khogyang community were recruited. The mean scores of the 3 variables (knowledge, belief and behavior) regarding agrochemical safety were measured. The results revealed that knowledge of farmer participants on agrochemical use was observed at low level. The level of overall belief regarding agrochemical safety was observed at moderate level. The mean scores of perceived susceptibility, seriousness, barriers, and benefits of agrochemical safety were 3.85 + 0.74, 3.52 + 0.56, 3.61+0.39 and 3.66+0.96, respectively. Behavior of farmer participants on agrochemical safety was also observed at moderate level. There were positive statistically significant correlations between knowledge and behavior scores; and overall belief and behavior scores (r = 0.336 and 0.621, respectively). In addition, statistically significant predictive variables associated agrochemical safety behavior were knowledge and belief on agrochemical use (Beta = 0.120 and 0. 0.576, respectively). These predictors accounted for 39.80 percents of variance. All predictors were positively related to agrochemical use behavior. The most common of agrochemicals use in the Kogyang community was “Glyphosate”. Health risk behaviors regarding agrochemical use were lack of attention to safety precautions and the use of inappropriate protective gear. These are an elementary guide that is useful in introducing the ideas of community involvement in agrochemical safety behaviors © 2013 European Journal of Research on Education by IASSR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国南部橡胶农使用农用化学品的风险行为
本研究的目的是评估2012年9月至12月期间泰国庄府Khogyang社区农民对农用化学品安全行为的知识、信念和行为。应用健康信念模型和社区参与方法的原则,制定了降低农用化学品行为风险的综合战略。从高阳社区8个村招募了316名农民。测量农用化学品安全知识、信念和行为三个变量的平均得分。结果显示,参与调查的农民对农药使用的了解程度较低。对农用化学品安全的总体信任度处于中等水平。农化安全感知易感性、严重性、障碍和效益的平均得分分别为3.85 + 0.74、3.52 + 0.56、3.61+0.39和3.66+0.96。农民参与者对农药安全的行为也处于中等水平。知识与行为得分呈显著正相关;总体信念和行为得分(r分别为0.336和0.621)。此外,与农药安全行为相关的预测变量为农药使用知识和信念(Beta值分别为0.120和0)。分别为0.576)。这些预测因子占了39.80%的方差。所有预测因子均与农药使用行为呈正相关。在平壤社区最常用的农用化学品是“草甘膦”。农用化学品的健康风险行为是缺乏对安全预防措施的重视和使用不适当的防护装备。这是一份基本指南,有助于介绍社区参与农用化学品安全行为的想法©2013年IASSR出版的欧洲教育研究杂志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Education Sciences
Journal of Research in Education Sciences EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
66.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Education Sciences is published by National Taiwan Normal University. The mission of this Journal is to publish original research papers in the domain of education (principles of instruction, learning, and assessment; educational administration and strategy; learning courses ; science and technology education). All papers that present educational concepts and results of research and development obtained through empirical research methods, such as methods of quantitative research, qualitative research, or a combination of both, are solicited by this journal.
期刊最新文献
Between “push” and “pull”?─ an analysis of taiwan’s “brain drain” and possible solutions from the perspective of push-pull theory: The examples of ph.d. holders in the U.S 高中學生角色期望量表之編製 Development of Inventory for the Role Expectations of High-School Students Follow-up study on college learning performance and career development of science class graduates Relationship between self-efficacy of invention, epistemic curiosity, and students’ intentions to consistently participate in the IEYI Outcomes of the application of performance-based assessment system for educational practicums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1