S. Barker-Collo, A. Theadom, K. Jones, N. Starkey, Kris Fernando, M. Kahan, P. Prah, V. Feigin
{"title":"Three methods for examining trajectories in neuropsychological performance across the first 4 years after mild Traumatic Brain Injury","authors":"S. Barker-Collo, A. Theadom, K. Jones, N. Starkey, Kris Fernando, M. Kahan, P. Prah, V. Feigin","doi":"10.1017/brimp.2019.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging data suggest that recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) takes longer than previously thought. This paper examines trajectories for cognitive recovery up to 48 months post-mTBI, presenting these visually using a Sankey diagram and growth curve analysis.This sample (n = 301) represents adults (≥16 years) from a population-based Brain Injury Outcomes in the New Zealand Community study over a 4-year follow-up on the CNS-Vital Signs neuropsychological test. Data were collected within 2 weeks of injury, and then at 1, 6, 12 and 48 months post-injury.Significant improvement in cognitive functioning was seen up to 6 months post-injury. Using growth curve modelling, we found significant improvements in overall neurocognition from baseline to 6 months, on average participants improved one point per month (0.9; 95% CI 0.42–1.39) p < 0.001. No change in neurocognition was found within the time periods 6–12 months or 12–48 months. The Sankey highlighted that at each time point, a small proportion of participants remained unchanged or declined. Proportionally, few show any improvement after the first 6 months.Most individuals remained stable or improved over time to 6 months post-injury. Summary statistics are informative regarding overall trends, but can mask differing trajectories for recovery. The Sankey diagram indicates that not all improve, as well as the potential impact of individuals moving in and out of the study. The Sankey diagram also indicated the level of functioning of those most likely to withdraw, allowing targeting of retention strategies.","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/brimp.2019.31","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emerging data suggest that recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) takes longer than previously thought. This paper examines trajectories for cognitive recovery up to 48 months post-mTBI, presenting these visually using a Sankey diagram and growth curve analysis.This sample (n = 301) represents adults (≥16 years) from a population-based Brain Injury Outcomes in the New Zealand Community study over a 4-year follow-up on the CNS-Vital Signs neuropsychological test. Data were collected within 2 weeks of injury, and then at 1, 6, 12 and 48 months post-injury.Significant improvement in cognitive functioning was seen up to 6 months post-injury. Using growth curve modelling, we found significant improvements in overall neurocognition from baseline to 6 months, on average participants improved one point per month (0.9; 95% CI 0.42–1.39) p < 0.001. No change in neurocognition was found within the time periods 6–12 months or 12–48 months. The Sankey highlighted that at each time point, a small proportion of participants remained unchanged or declined. Proportionally, few show any improvement after the first 6 months.Most individuals remained stable or improved over time to 6 months post-injury. Summary statistics are informative regarding overall trends, but can mask differing trajectories for recovery. The Sankey diagram indicates that not all improve, as well as the potential impact of individuals moving in and out of the study. The Sankey diagram also indicated the level of functioning of those most likely to withdraw, allowing targeting of retention strategies.
新出现的数据表明,从轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)中恢复需要的时间比以前想象的要长。本文研究了mtbi后48个月的认知恢复轨迹,使用桑基图和生长曲线分析直观地展示了这些轨迹。该样本(n = 301)代表来自新西兰社区一项基于人群的脑损伤结局研究的成年人(≥16岁),该研究对cns -生命体征神经心理测试进行了为期4年的随访。分别于伤后2周、1个月、6个月、12个月和48个月采集数据。损伤后6个月认知功能显著改善。使用生长曲线模型,我们发现从基线到6个月的整体神经认知有显著改善,参与者平均每月改善1点(0.9;95% CI 0.42-1.39) p < 0.001。在6-12个月或12-48个月的时间内,神经认知没有变化。桑基强调,在每个时间点,一小部分参与者保持不变或下降。按比例来看,在前6个月之后,几乎没有人表现出任何改善。大多数人在受伤后6个月保持稳定或有所改善。摘要统计数据对总体趋势提供了信息,但可能掩盖了复苏的不同轨迹。桑基图表明,并不是所有的人都有所改善,以及个人进入和离开研究的潜在影响。桑基图还显示了那些最有可能退出的人的功能水平,从而使保留率策略成为可能。
期刊介绍:
The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.