Shannon Juengst, Brittany Wright, Leia Vos, Gabriel Rodriguez, Michael Conley, Lauren Terhorst
Background The Behavioural Assessment Screening Tool (BAST), which measures self-reported neurobehavioural symptoms experienced by adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI), was specifically developed as a self-reported measure for remote symptom reporting. Our aim was to assess the convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity of the BAST among community-dwelling adults with TBI. Methods We assessed correlations and group differences with previously validated measures in two existing datasets (n =111, n =134). Other measures were the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depression), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (anxiety), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (Executive Dysfunction, Apathy, Disinhibition), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (Fatigue), Aggression Questionnaire (anger, hostility, physical and verbal aggression), and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (alcohol misuse). Results BAST subscales had stronger correlations with measures of similar (|r |=0.602-0.828, P r |=0.364-0.589, P r |d =1.2-1.9) for known groups with moderate-severe depression, moderate-severe anxiety, fatigue, problematic disinhibited and frontal executive behaviours, and alcohol misuse. Results support the construct validity of the BAST subscales. Conclusion(s) The BAST demonstrated good convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, supporting its use for remote self-reported symptom reporting to improve chronic symptom monitoring in community-dwelling adults with TBI.
{"title":"Convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity of the Behavioural Assessment Screening Tool (BAST) in chronic traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Shannon Juengst, Brittany Wright, Leia Vos, Gabriel Rodriguez, Michael Conley, Lauren Terhorst","doi":"10.1071/IB24064","DOIUrl":"10.1071/IB24064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The Behavioural Assessment Screening Tool (BAST), which measures self-reported neurobehavioural symptoms experienced by adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI), was specifically developed as a self-reported measure for remote symptom reporting. Our aim was to assess the convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity of the BAST among community-dwelling adults with TBI. Methods We assessed correlations and group differences with previously validated measures in two existing datasets (n =111, n =134). Other measures were the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depression), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (anxiety), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (Executive Dysfunction, Apathy, Disinhibition), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (Fatigue), Aggression Questionnaire (anger, hostility, physical and verbal aggression), and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (alcohol misuse). Results BAST subscales had stronger correlations with measures of similar (|r |=0.602-0.828, P r |=0.364-0.589, P r |d =1.2-1.9) for known groups with moderate-severe depression, moderate-severe anxiety, fatigue, problematic disinhibited and frontal executive behaviours, and alcohol misuse. Results support the construct validity of the BAST subscales. Conclusion(s) The BAST demonstrated good convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, supporting its use for remote self-reported symptom reporting to improve chronic symptom monitoring in community-dwelling adults with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143365921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elise Bogart, Joanne Steel, Emma Power, Melissa Brunner, Sarah Tran, Davida Fromm, Brian MacWhinney, Leanne Togher
Background Cognitive-communication disorders are highly prevalent after traumatic brain injury and have significant impacts on rehabilitation outcomes. TBIBank Grand Rounds was developed as an online multimedia resource to support clinical education about cognitive-communication disorders. The objective of this study was to survey speech pathology educators to establish their views towards TBIBank Grand Rounds. Method An online survey with 37 items was distributed internationally to obtain a cross-section of international educators. The survey consisted of five sections covering (1) participant details; (2) awareness, interest, and use; (3) interface design and delivery; (4) content; and (5) overall impressions. The question formats included yes/no questions, multiple choice options, rating scales, and free text questions. Survey responses were analysed descriptively, with free text supporting interpretation. Results Twenty-five participants completed the online survey. Overall, most users agreed that the design and content of TBIBank Grand Rounds met their needs for supporting education about cognitive-communication disorders. The survey identified high interest but limited prior awareness of the resource. Survey respondents identified useful directions for updates, future enhancements, and dissemination of TBIBank Grand Rounds. Conclusions Incorporating feedback from educators has identified priorities for future enhancements, such as improving cultural diversity. High interest and positive feedback indicate that the TBIBank Grand Rounds is a valuable resource for education about cognitive-communication disorders. However, limited awareness internationally suggests the need for improved dissemination. Enhancing speech pathologists' knowledge about cognitive-communication disorders after TBI may lead to improved clinical care and outcomes.
{"title":"Views of speech pathology educators on a learning resource for cognitive-communication disorders: a user survey of TBIBank Grand Rounds.","authors":"Elise Bogart, Joanne Steel, Emma Power, Melissa Brunner, Sarah Tran, Davida Fromm, Brian MacWhinney, Leanne Togher","doi":"10.1071/IB24081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Cognitive-communication disorders are highly prevalent after traumatic brain injury and have significant impacts on rehabilitation outcomes. TBIBank Grand Rounds was developed as an online multimedia resource to support clinical education about cognitive-communication disorders. The objective of this study was to survey speech pathology educators to establish their views towards TBIBank Grand Rounds. Method An online survey with 37 items was distributed internationally to obtain a cross-section of international educators. The survey consisted of five sections covering (1) participant details; (2) awareness, interest, and use; (3) interface design and delivery; (4) content; and (5) overall impressions. The question formats included yes/no questions, multiple choice options, rating scales, and free text questions. Survey responses were analysed descriptively, with free text supporting interpretation. Results Twenty-five participants completed the online survey. Overall, most users agreed that the design and content of TBIBank Grand Rounds met their needs for supporting education about cognitive-communication disorders. The survey identified high interest but limited prior awareness of the resource. Survey respondents identified useful directions for updates, future enhancements, and dissemination of TBIBank Grand Rounds. Conclusions Incorporating feedback from educators has identified priorities for future enhancements, such as improving cultural diversity. High interest and positive feedback indicate that the TBIBank Grand Rounds is a valuable resource for education about cognitive-communication disorders. However, limited awareness internationally suggests the need for improved dissemination. Enhancing speech pathologists' knowledge about cognitive-communication disorders after TBI may lead to improved clinical care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143069846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alejandro García-Rudolph, Mark Andrew Wright, Claudia Teixidó, Eloy Opisso, Gunnar Cedersund, Josep Medina
Background Stroke now represents the condition with the highest need for physical rehabilitation worldwide, with only low or moderate-level evidence testing telerehabilitation compared to in-person care. We compared functional ambulation in subacute patients with stroke following telerehabilitation and matched in-person controls with no biopsychosocial differences at baseline. Methods We conducted a matched case-control study to compare functional ambulation between individuals with stroke following telerehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation, assessed using the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) and the Functional Independence Measure™ (FIM). Results The telerehabilitation group (n =38) achieved significantly higher FAC gains (1.5 (1.3) vs 1.0 (1.0)) than the in-person rehabilitation group, with no differences in ambulation efficiency, in individuals: admitted to rehabilitation within 60days after stroke onset; aged 49.8 (±11.4) years at admission; 55.3% female sex; moderate stroke severity; 42.1% with 'good' motor FIM at baseline; mostly living with sentimental partner (73.7%); with 21.1% holding an university education degree. Conclusions The groups showed no significant differences in ambulation efficiency, though the telerehabilitation group achieved higher FAC gains. Our results suggest that home telerehabilitation can be considered a good alternative to in-person rehabilitation when addressing ambulation in patients with moderate stroke severity and whose home situation mostly includes a cohabiting partner.
{"title":"Efficiency of telerehabilitation on subacute stroke ambulation: a matched case-control study.","authors":"Alejandro García-Rudolph, Mark Andrew Wright, Claudia Teixidó, Eloy Opisso, Gunnar Cedersund, Josep Medina","doi":"10.1071/IB24032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Stroke now represents the condition with the highest need for physical rehabilitation worldwide, with only low or moderate-level evidence testing telerehabilitation compared to in-person care. We compared functional ambulation in subacute patients with stroke following telerehabilitation and matched in-person controls with no biopsychosocial differences at baseline. Methods We conducted a matched case-control study to compare functional ambulation between individuals with stroke following telerehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation, assessed using the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) and the Functional Independence Measure™ (FIM). Results The telerehabilitation group (n =38) achieved significantly higher FAC gains (1.5 (1.3) vs 1.0 (1.0)) than the in-person rehabilitation group, with no differences in ambulation efficiency, in individuals: admitted to rehabilitation within 60days after stroke onset; aged 49.8 (±11.4) years at admission; 55.3% female sex; moderate stroke severity; 42.1% with 'good' motor FIM at baseline; mostly living with sentimental partner (73.7%); with 21.1% holding an university education degree. Conclusions The groups showed no significant differences in ambulation efficiency, though the telerehabilitation group achieved higher FAC gains. Our results suggest that home telerehabilitation can be considered a good alternative to in-person rehabilitation when addressing ambulation in patients with moderate stroke severity and whose home situation mostly includes a cohabiting partner.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sandra Reeder, Katherine Sewell, Natasha A Lannin, Madeleine J Smith, Bridgette D Semple
Background Many people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) report problems with social functioning that can have immediate and enduring impacts. We aimed to explore perceptions of social functioning after TBI and understand attitudes towards medication that could improve long-term social outcomes. Method A qualitative descriptive approach using interview methods was conducted in Victoria, Australia. Using purposive sampling we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with people with moderate to severe TBI between July and September 2021. Results Using a framework approach, we thematically identified three themes: (1) impacts of TBI on social roles and activities, including changes in recreational activities and role changes in family units; (2) change in social networks, resulting from shifts in attitudes to social activities and mental health issues; and (3) openness to novel treatments to improve social functioning - willingness to take potential medication to improve social functioning and the factors that have an impact on decision making. Conclusion Our results highlight that people with TBI experience a range of changes in social participation post-TBI, and that they have a strong interest in improving their social functioning. Such insights provide opportunities to tailor patient-centric treatments and circumnavigate barriers in the early stages of medication development for successful translation into practice in this population.
{"title":"'Would you take a drug for this?': attitudes by individuals with traumatic brain injury towards medication to improve social functioning.","authors":"Sandra Reeder, Katherine Sewell, Natasha A Lannin, Madeleine J Smith, Bridgette D Semple","doi":"10.1071/IB24051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24051","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Many people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) report problems with social functioning that can have immediate and enduring impacts. We aimed to explore perceptions of social functioning after TBI and understand attitudes towards medication that could improve long-term social outcomes. Method A qualitative descriptive approach using interview methods was conducted in Victoria, Australia. Using purposive sampling we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with people with moderate to severe TBI between July and September 2021. Results Using a framework approach, we thematically identified three themes: (1) impacts of TBI on social roles and activities, including changes in recreational activities and role changes in family units; (2) change in social networks, resulting from shifts in attitudes to social activities and mental health issues; and (3) openness to novel treatments to improve social functioning - willingness to take potential medication to improve social functioning and the factors that have an impact on decision making. Conclusion Our results highlight that people with TBI experience a range of changes in social participation post-TBI, and that they have a strong interest in improving their social functioning. Such insights provide opportunities to tailor patient-centric treatments and circumnavigate barriers in the early stages of medication development for successful translation into practice in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143069849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background This scoping review aimed to identify literature describing allied health interventions used to address challenging behaviour for adults with an acquired brain injury (ABI) living in community settings and identify the impact of these interventions on outcomes across the domains of behaviour, activity, and participation. Methods The Polyglot Search Translator for scoping reviews guided the search of six databases: (1) Ovid Medline®, (2) EmCARE (Ovid), (3) CINAHL Complete, (4) Embase (Ovid), (5) Scopus, and (6) Cochrane Library to identify literature published between 1990 and 2023. Results Of the 1748 records screened, 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies commonly described therapeutic, least restrictive approaches to challenging behaviour founded on a positive behaviour support framework. Interventions were individualised, combining multiple elements to effect change in the environment, behaviour of the people providing support, and/or skills and behaviour of the person with ABI. Although most studies reported clinical gains from intervention, study designs used a range of methods and either single cases or mixed populations. Conclusions The findings of this review suggest that allied health interventions have the potential to reduce challenging behaviour experienced by people with ABI. However, further research addressing the impact of interventions on activity and participation is required to inform clinical practice and improve long-term outcomes.
{"title":"Challenging behaviour, activity, and participation following acquired brain injury: a scoping review of interventions delivered by allied health professionals.","authors":"Sue Sloan, Em Bould, Libby Callaway","doi":"10.1071/IB24079","DOIUrl":"10.1071/IB24079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background This scoping review aimed to identify literature describing allied health interventions used to address challenging behaviour for adults with an acquired brain injury (ABI) living in community settings and identify the impact of these interventions on outcomes across the domains of behaviour, activity, and participation. Methods The Polyglot Search Translator for scoping reviews guided the search of six databases: (1) Ovid Medline®, (2) EmCARE (Ovid), (3) CINAHL Complete, (4) Embase (Ovid), (5) Scopus, and (6) Cochrane Library to identify literature published between 1990 and 2023. Results Of the 1748 records screened, 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies commonly described therapeutic, least restrictive approaches to challenging behaviour founded on a positive behaviour support framework. Interventions were individualised, combining multiple elements to effect change in the environment, behaviour of the people providing support, and/or skills and behaviour of the person with ABI. Although most studies reported clinical gains from intervention, study designs used a range of methods and either single cases or mixed populations. Conclusions The findings of this review suggest that allied health interventions have the potential to reduce challenging behaviour experienced by people with ABI. However, further research addressing the impact of interventions on activity and participation is required to inform clinical practice and improve long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background Depression is commonly studied post stroke, while anxiety is less studied. This study presents prevalence of depression and anxiety at 1- and 12-months post ischemic stroke alongside three methods for examining within-subjects change over time. Methods Participants were ischemic stroke patients of the Auckland Regional Community Stroke Study (ARCOS-V) with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale data at 1- (n =343) and 12-months (n =307). Change over time was examined using within-subjects repeated measures ANOVA, calculation of the Reliable Change Index, and a Sankey diagram of those meeting cut-off scores (>7) for caseness over time. Results Using repeated measures ANOVA, depression scores didn't change significantly over time, while anxiety symptoms decreased significantly. When reliable change was calculated, 4.2% of individuals had reliable decreases in anxiety symptoms, while 5.7% had reliable decreases in depression symptoms. Those who had a reliable decrease in one tended to have a reliable decrease in the other. In the Sankey, the proportion of those meeting the cut-off score for anxiety did not change over time (12.8 and 12.7% at 1- and 12-months), while those meeting the cut-off for depression increased slightly (3.7-4.5%) and those meeting cut-offs for both decreased from 10.4 to 8.1%. Conclusion The three methods produced very different findings. Use of cut-off scores is common but has limitations. Calculation of clinically reliable change is recommended. Further work is needed to ensure depression and anxiety are monitored over time post-stroke, and both should be the subject of intervention efforts in both acute and late stages post-stroke.
{"title":"Depression and anxiety at 1- and 12-months post ischemic stroke: methods for examining individual change over time.","authors":"Suzanne Barker-Collo, Rita Krishnamurthi, Balakrishnan Nair, Anna Ranta, Jeroen Douwes, Valery Feigin","doi":"10.1071/IB24025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Depression is commonly studied post stroke, while anxiety is less studied. This study presents prevalence of depression and anxiety at 1- and 12-months post ischemic stroke alongside three methods for examining within-subjects change over time. Methods Participants were ischemic stroke patients of the Auckland Regional Community Stroke Study (ARCOS-V) with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale data at 1- (n =343) and 12-months (n =307). Change over time was examined using within-subjects repeated measures ANOVA, calculation of the Reliable Change Index, and a Sankey diagram of those meeting cut-off scores (>7) for caseness over time. Results Using repeated measures ANOVA, depression scores didn't change significantly over time, while anxiety symptoms decreased significantly. When reliable change was calculated, 4.2% of individuals had reliable decreases in anxiety symptoms, while 5.7% had reliable decreases in depression symptoms. Those who had a reliable decrease in one tended to have a reliable decrease in the other. In the Sankey, the proportion of those meeting the cut-off score for anxiety did not change over time (12.8 and 12.7% at 1- and 12-months), while those meeting the cut-off for depression increased slightly (3.7-4.5%) and those meeting cut-offs for both decreased from 10.4 to 8.1%. Conclusion The three methods produced very different findings. Use of cut-off scores is common but has limitations. Calculation of clinically reliable change is recommended. Further work is needed to ensure depression and anxiety are monitored over time post-stroke, and both should be the subject of intervention efforts in both acute and late stages post-stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142787851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kathryn Marshall, Janelle Griffin, Joshua Knowles, Shannon Galletly, Freyr Patterson, Ryan Bell
Background and objectives Falls research has explored the characteristics of patients with a brain injury who experienced falls and the nature of these falls. However, the characteristics of falls with consequence have not yet been investigated. This study aimed to explore the consequences of patient falls in inpatient brain injury rehabilitation. Method Data were retrospectively analysed from incident reports and patient medical charts. Participants were included who had fallen during brain injury rehabilitation at a metropolitan hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. Falls with a reported consequence including pain, laceration, soft tissue injury, fracture and traumatic brain injury (consequential falls) were compared to falls that did not have a consequence. Significant patient and fall variables for a fall with consequence were explored. Results Over the 5-year study period 855 patients were admitted and 161 patients (64% male) experienced 276 falls. Of the 161 patients, 90 (56%) experienced a consequence from one or more falls, with 119 (43%) of falls having consequences. The odds of a consequential fall increased 1.03 times for each year increase in age. The odds of a consequential fall in autumn, winter, and spring were two to three times higher than in summer and were 3.6 times higher when the fall was unwitnessed by staff. Conclusions More falls with consequence occurred with increasing age and when unwitnessed by staff. This knowledge supports the need for older persons to have additional supervision and assistance during inpatient brain injury rehabilitation to reduce harm from falls.
{"title":"Falls on an inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit … What are the consequences?","authors":"Kathryn Marshall, Janelle Griffin, Joshua Knowles, Shannon Galletly, Freyr Patterson, Ryan Bell","doi":"10.1071/IB24021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and objectives Falls research has explored the characteristics of patients with a brain injury who experienced falls and the nature of these falls. However, the characteristics of falls with consequence have not yet been investigated. This study aimed to explore the consequences of patient falls in inpatient brain injury rehabilitation. Method Data were retrospectively analysed from incident reports and patient medical charts. Participants were included who had fallen during brain injury rehabilitation at a metropolitan hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. Falls with a reported consequence including pain, laceration, soft tissue injury, fracture and traumatic brain injury (consequential falls) were compared to falls that did not have a consequence. Significant patient and fall variables for a fall with consequence were explored. Results Over the 5-year study period 855 patients were admitted and 161 patients (64% male) experienced 276 falls. Of the 161 patients, 90 (56%) experienced a consequence from one or more falls, with 119 (43%) of falls having consequences. The odds of a consequential fall increased 1.03 times for each year increase in age. The odds of a consequential fall in autumn, winter, and spring were two to three times higher than in summer and were 3.6 times higher when the fall was unwitnessed by staff. Conclusions More falls with consequence occurred with increasing age and when unwitnessed by staff. This knowledge supports the need for older persons to have additional supervision and assistance during inpatient brain injury rehabilitation to reduce harm from falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background We aimed to investigate the association between protein intake and quadriceps quantity and quality on the paretic and non-paretic sides during rehabilitation in people with subacute stroke. Method Eighty-six people with stroke were recruited from a rehabilitation ward. We measured quadriceps muscle quantity and quality on the paretic and non-paretic sides using ultrasonography at admission and after 4weeks. Protein intake was assessed 2 or 3weeks after admission, and participants were classified into two groups: adequate and inadequate protein intake groups. Analysis of covariance was used to determine the effects of protein intake on quadriceps muscle quantity and quality. Results The mean age (standard deviation), median interval between stroke onset and admission (interquartile range) and male proportion of the study participants were 67.6 (13.5) years, 22.5 (16.8-31.3) days, and 54.7%, respectively. The adequate protein intake group showed significantly greater improvements in paretic-side quadriceps thickness than the inadequate group (group-by-time interaction, F =8.771, P =0.004). In contrast, no significant interactions were observed in quadriceps thickness on the non-paretic side (F =2.383, P =0.127) and quadriceps echo intensity on both sides (paretic-side: F =0.020, P =0.887, non-paretic side: F =0.181, P =0.672). Conclusions Adequate protein intake may be useful for improving quadriceps quantity on the paretic side in people with subacute stroke undergoing rehabilitation. However, quadriceps quantity on the non-paretic side and quadriceps quality on both sides were not significantly associated with adequate protein intake.
背景:我们的目的是研究亚急性脑卒中患者康复期间,蛋白质摄入量与瘫侧和非瘫侧股四头肌数量和质量之间的关系。方法选取某康复病房脑卒中患者86例。我们在入院时和4周后分别用超声测量了患儿患儿麻痹侧和非麻痹侧的股四头肌的数量和质量。入院后2或3周评估蛋白质摄入量,并将参与者分为两组:蛋白质摄入充足组和蛋白质摄入不足组。采用协方差分析确定蛋白质摄入量对股四头肌数量和质量的影响。结果研究参与者的平均年龄(标准差)、卒中发作至入院的中位间隔(四分位间距)和男性比例分别为67.6(13.5)岁、22.5(16.8-31.3)天和54.7%。蛋白质摄入充足组对侧股四头肌厚度的改善明显大于蛋白质摄入不足组(组间交互作用,F =8.771, P =0.004)。非失视侧股四头肌厚度(F =2.383, P =0.127)与双侧股四头肌回声强度(失视侧:F =0.020, P =0.887,非失视侧:F =0.181, P =0.672)无显著相互作用。结论适当的蛋白质摄入可能有助于亚急性脑卒中康复患者瘫侧股四头肌数量的改善。然而,非瘫侧的股四头肌数量和两侧的股四头肌质量与足够的蛋白质摄入没有显著相关。
{"title":"Association between adequate protein intake and quadriceps quantity and quality during rehabilitation in people with subacute stroke.","authors":"Shu Tanaka, Mizue Suzuki, Yosuke Kimura, Shingo Koyama, Hiroaki Masuda, Iwao Kojima, Katsumi Suzukawa, Kenichiro Takasugi, Minoru Yamada","doi":"10.1071/IB24035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24035","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background We aimed to investigate the association between protein intake and quadriceps quantity and quality on the paretic and non-paretic sides during rehabilitation in people with subacute stroke. Method Eighty-six people with stroke were recruited from a rehabilitation ward. We measured quadriceps muscle quantity and quality on the paretic and non-paretic sides using ultrasonography at admission and after 4weeks. Protein intake was assessed 2 or 3weeks after admission, and participants were classified into two groups: adequate and inadequate protein intake groups. Analysis of covariance was used to determine the effects of protein intake on quadriceps muscle quantity and quality. Results The mean age (standard deviation), median interval between stroke onset and admission (interquartile range) and male proportion of the study participants were 67.6 (13.5) years, 22.5 (16.8-31.3) days, and 54.7%, respectively. The adequate protein intake group showed significantly greater improvements in paretic-side quadriceps thickness than the inadequate group (group-by-time interaction, F =8.771, P =0.004). In contrast, no significant interactions were observed in quadriceps thickness on the non-paretic side (F =2.383, P =0.127) and quadriceps echo intensity on both sides (paretic-side: F =0.020, P =0.887, non-paretic side: F =0.181, P =0.672). Conclusions Adequate protein intake may be useful for improving quadriceps quantity on the paretic side in people with subacute stroke undergoing rehabilitation. However, quadriceps quantity on the non-paretic side and quadriceps quality on both sides were not significantly associated with adequate protein intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle McIntyre, Jennifer Cullen, Caoilfionn Turner, India Bohanna, Ali Lakhani, Kylie Rixon
{"title":"<i>Corrigendum to</i>: The development of a cognitive screening protocol for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples: the Guddi Way screen.","authors":"Michelle McIntyre, Jennifer Cullen, Caoilfionn Turner, India Bohanna, Ali Lakhani, Kylie Rixon","doi":"10.1071/IB23058_CO","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23058_CO","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142735083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tamara Tse, Yvonne Y K Mak-Yuen, Wesley Young, Susan Darzins
Background Wearable devices, such as accelerometers, offer novel approaches to measuring post-stroke upper limb activity. Limited studies have explored feasibility of accelerometry. Guided by the Bowen Feasibility Framework, this feasibility study aimed to examine the practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb program with stroke survivors using a pre-post study of sequentially eligible inpatients. Method Key metrics were: practicality (60% of participants had 10hours of wear per day for 3 or more days), acceptability (adherence to recommended wear-time), and limited efficacy (correlation between Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and upper limb use from accelerometry data). Results Twelve stroke survivors were recruited over 7 months, mean age 73years (range 39-94years). Eight participants (67%) met the practicality and acceptability criteria. A moderate positive correlation existed between WMFT and upper limb use at admission (r s =0.33, P =0.42) and at discharge (r s =0.42, P =0.34). Conclusion Wearable devices were feasible and acceptable for most stroke survivors, however, one-third found the devices uncomfortable, and this should be factored into sample size calculations of future studies.
{"title":"Feasibility of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb activity program of a subacute setting with stroke survivors.","authors":"Tamara Tse, Yvonne Y K Mak-Yuen, Wesley Young, Susan Darzins","doi":"10.1071/IB24008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Wearable devices, such as accelerometers, offer novel approaches to measuring post-stroke upper limb activity. Limited studies have explored feasibility of accelerometry. Guided by the Bowen Feasibility Framework, this feasibility study aimed to examine the practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb program with stroke survivors using a pre-post study of sequentially eligible inpatients. Method Key metrics were: practicality (60% of participants had 10hours of wear per day for 3 or more days), acceptability (adherence to recommended wear-time), and limited efficacy (correlation between Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and upper limb use from accelerometry data). Results Twelve stroke survivors were recruited over 7 months, mean age 73years (range 39-94years). Eight participants (67%) met the practicality and acceptability criteria. A moderate positive correlation existed between WMFT and upper limb use at admission (r s =0.33, P =0.42) and at discharge (r s =0.42, P =0.34). Conclusion Wearable devices were feasible and acceptable for most stroke survivors, however, one-third found the devices uncomfortable, and this should be factored into sample size calculations of future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142633494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}