Tamara Tse, Yvonne Y K Mak-Yuen, Wesley Young, Susan Darzins
Background Wearable devices, such as accelerometers, offer novel approaches to measuring post-stroke upper limb activity. Limited studies have explored feasibility of accelerometry. Guided by the Bowen Feasibility Framework, this feasibility study aimed to examine the practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb program with stroke survivors using a pre-post study of sequentially eligible inpatients. Method Key metrics were: practicality (60% of participants had 10hours of wear per day for 3 or more days), acceptability (adherence to recommended wear-time), and limited efficacy (correlation between Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and upper limb use from accelerometry data). Results Twelve stroke survivors were recruited over 7 months, mean age 73years (range 39-94years). Eight participants (67%) met the practicality and acceptability criteria. A moderate positive correlation existed between WMFT and upper limb use at admission (r s =0.33, P =0.42) and at discharge (r s =0.42, P =0.34). Conclusion Wearable devices were feasible and acceptable for most stroke survivors, however, one-third found the devices uncomfortable, and this should be factored into sample size calculations of future studies.
{"title":"Feasibility of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb activity program of a subacute setting with stroke survivors.","authors":"Tamara Tse, Yvonne Y K Mak-Yuen, Wesley Young, Susan Darzins","doi":"10.1071/IB24008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Wearable devices, such as accelerometers, offer novel approaches to measuring post-stroke upper limb activity. Limited studies have explored feasibility of accelerometry. Guided by the Bowen Feasibility Framework, this feasibility study aimed to examine the practicality, acceptability, and limited efficacy of accelerometry in a self-directed upper limb program with stroke survivors using a pre-post study of sequentially eligible inpatients. Method Key metrics were: practicality (60% of participants had 10hours of wear per day for 3 or more days), acceptability (adherence to recommended wear-time), and limited efficacy (correlation between Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and upper limb use from accelerometry data). Results Twelve stroke survivors were recruited over 7 months, mean age 73years (range 39-94years). Eight participants (67%) met the practicality and acceptability criteria. A moderate positive correlation existed between WMFT and upper limb use at admission (r s =0.33, P =0.42) and at discharge (r s =0.42, P =0.34). Conclusion Wearable devices were feasible and acceptable for most stroke survivors, however, one-third found the devices uncomfortable, and this should be factored into sample size calculations of future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142633494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background Understanding health professional perceptions and experiences when supporting post-stroke physical activity may assist with development of strategies targeting low physical activity observed in this group. The aims of this study were to explore health professionals' perceptions and experiences of post-stroke physical activity, the barriers they experience and potential facilitators when supporting people with stroke to be active. Methods Ten focus groups were conducted with 57 health professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses, exercise physiologists, psychologists and sports scientists) and allied health students. Data were analysed via inductive thematic analysis. Results Health professionals were reluctant to recommend moderate intensity physical activity. Barriers included: (1) post-stroke barriers being varied and individual; (2) resources being under pressure and (3) physical activity goals falling through the cracks. Suggested facilitators included: (1) clearly defined roles, processes and environments which encourage activity; (2) funding for more staff; (3) improving health professional skills and confidence and (4) using internal motivation and social supports after stroke. Conclusions Post-stroke physical activity is a complex goal. Varied and individual barriers require tailored solutions. Health professionals report insufficient time, resources and skills to address these individual barriers as well as limited pathways to access physical activity support. Resource-efficient interventions and care models that allow routine strategies targeting post-stroke physical activity are required.
{"title":"Perceptions and experiences of health professionals when supporting adults with stroke to engage in physical activity.","authors":"A Pepar, N Mahendran, E Preston, R Keegan","doi":"10.1071/IB23129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Understanding health professional perceptions and experiences when supporting post-stroke physical activity may assist with development of strategies targeting low physical activity observed in this group. The aims of this study were to explore health professionals' perceptions and experiences of post-stroke physical activity, the barriers they experience and potential facilitators when supporting people with stroke to be active. Methods Ten focus groups were conducted with 57 health professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nurses, exercise physiologists, psychologists and sports scientists) and allied health students. Data were analysed via inductive thematic analysis. Results Health professionals were reluctant to recommend moderate intensity physical activity. Barriers included: (1) post-stroke barriers being varied and individual; (2) resources being under pressure and (3) physical activity goals falling through the cracks. Suggested facilitators included: (1) clearly defined roles, processes and environments which encourage activity; (2) funding for more staff; (3) improving health professional skills and confidence and (4) using internal motivation and social supports after stroke. Conclusions Post-stroke physical activity is a complex goal. Varied and individual barriers require tailored solutions. Health professionals report insufficient time, resources and skills to address these individual barriers as well as limited pathways to access physical activity support. Resource-efficient interventions and care models that allow routine strategies targeting post-stroke physical activity are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142513875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amelia J Hicks, Angelle M Sander, Dean P McKenzie, Sarah Carrier, Elinor Fraser, Bronwyn Hall, Monique R Pappadis, Jennie L Ponsford
Background Little is known about health literacy in traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. The aims of this study were to compare health literacy in individuals with TBI with that of a control group; to examine the association between health literacy in individuals with TBI and demographic, injury, and cognitive factors; and compare the relationship between health literacy and physical and mental health outcomes. Methods A cross-sectional observational study design was used. Adults (≥18years) were recruited from an outpatient research centre in Victoria, Australia. There were 209 participants with a complicated mild to severe TBI at least 1year previously (up to 30years 6months) and 206 control participants. Results Individuals with TBI did not have poorer health literacy than controls (IRR=1.31, P =0.102, CI95% [0.947, 1.812]). Further analysis could not be completed due to the highly skewed Health Literacy Assessment Using Talking Touchscreen Technology - Short Form (Health LiTT-SF) data. Conclusion Health literacy performance in individuals with TBI was not significantly different to controls. Premorbid education may provide a critical cognitive reserve upon which TBI survivors can draw to aid their health literacy. These findings are specific to the Health LiTT-SF measure only and require replication using more comprehensive health literacy measures in culturally diverse samples.
{"title":"Health literacy after traumatic brain injury: characterisation and control comparison.","authors":"Amelia J Hicks, Angelle M Sander, Dean P McKenzie, Sarah Carrier, Elinor Fraser, Bronwyn Hall, Monique R Pappadis, Jennie L Ponsford","doi":"10.1071/IB23116","DOIUrl":"10.1071/IB23116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Little is known about health literacy in traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. The aims of this study were to compare health literacy in individuals with TBI with that of a control group; to examine the association between health literacy in individuals with TBI and demographic, injury, and cognitive factors; and compare the relationship between health literacy and physical and mental health outcomes. Methods A cross-sectional observational study design was used. Adults (≥18years) were recruited from an outpatient research centre in Victoria, Australia. There were 209 participants with a complicated mild to severe TBI at least 1year previously (up to 30years 6months) and 206 control participants. Results Individuals with TBI did not have poorer health literacy than controls (IRR=1.31, P =0.102, CI95% [0.947, 1.812]). Further analysis could not be completed due to the highly skewed Health Literacy Assessment Using Talking Touchscreen Technology - Short Form (Health LiTT-SF) data. Conclusion Health literacy performance in individuals with TBI was not significantly different to controls. Premorbid education may provide a critical cognitive reserve upon which TBI survivors can draw to aid their health literacy. These findings are specific to the Health LiTT-SF measure only and require replication using more comprehensive health literacy measures in culturally diverse samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elena Aidinoff, Hiela Lehrer, Ilana Gelernter, Ilil Dayan, Adi Kfir, Lilach Front, Ana Oksamitny, Amiram Catz
Background Studies that have shown neurological improvement following cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) did not include control groups. The aim of this study was to assess the justification of CP for these patients. Methods Data were collected from medical records of inpatients with UWS and MCS admitted between 2002 and 2018. Results Of the 144 participants (mean age 40 years, 76% males, 75% in UWS), 37% had CP following DC. The Loewenstein Communication Scale (LCS) gain was 12±17 and 16±17 for the control and study patients, respectively. The corresponding consciousness recovery rate (based on Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores) was 51% and 53%, respectively. One-year survival rates were 0.80 and 0.93, and 5-year survival rates were 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. Mean outcome values were higher for the study group, but the differences between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions The study did not demonstrate that CP increases brain recovery or survival. Nevertheless, it showed that CP did not decrease them either, and it did not increase complications rate. The findings, therefore, support offering CP to patients with UWS and MCS as CP does not increase risks and can achieve additional goals for these patients.
{"title":"The effect of cranioplasty on outcomes and complications of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally responsive state.","authors":"Elena Aidinoff, Hiela Lehrer, Ilana Gelernter, Ilil Dayan, Adi Kfir, Lilach Front, Ana Oksamitny, Amiram Catz","doi":"10.1071/IB23124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Studies that have shown neurological improvement following cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) in patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) did not include control groups. The aim of this study was to assess the justification of CP for these patients. Methods Data were collected from medical records of inpatients with UWS and MCS admitted between 2002 and 2018. Results Of the 144 participants (mean age 40 years, 76% males, 75% in UWS), 37% had CP following DC. The Loewenstein Communication Scale (LCS) gain was 12±17 and 16±17 for the control and study patients, respectively. The corresponding consciousness recovery rate (based on Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores) was 51% and 53%, respectively. One-year survival rates were 0.80 and 0.93, and 5-year survival rates were 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. Mean outcome values were higher for the study group, but the differences between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions The study did not demonstrate that CP increases brain recovery or survival. Nevertheless, it showed that CP did not decrease them either, and it did not increase complications rate. The findings, therefore, support offering CP to patients with UWS and MCS as CP does not increase risks and can achieve additional goals for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142302033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a highly recommended outcome measure to assess unilateral gross motor activity of the upper limbs. The BBT has not previously been available in a version adapted to the Spanish context. Thus, this study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and translate the BBT's instructions and pilot test the Spanish version of BBT in adults with acquired brain injury (ABI). Methods The BBT was translated and cross-culturally adapted following standard procedures. An expert committee approved the final Spanish version of BBT and it was conceptually validated by four therapists with expertise in ABI. The tool was tested on 14 adults with ABI. Results The Spanish version of BBT included a new section of materials for the test and a record to count the number of blocks transferred from one compartment of the box to the other. Following the pilot study, a modification in terminology was implemented for referring to the dominant and non-dominant hands. Conclusions Our results suggest that the Spanish version of BBT is suitable for assessing manual dexterity in Spanish-speaking adults with ABI.
背景 框和块测试(BBT)是评估单侧上肢粗大运动活动的一种非常值得推荐的结果测量方法。此前,BBT 还没有适合西班牙情况的版本。因此,本研究旨在对 BBT 的说明进行跨文化改编和翻译,并在后天性脑损伤(ABI)成人中对西班牙语版 BBT 进行试点测试。方法 按照标准程序对 BBT 进行翻译和跨文化改编。专家委员会批准了西班牙文版 BBT 的最终版本,并由四名具有 ABI 专业知识的治疗师对其进行了概念验证。该工具在 14 名患有 ABI 的成年人身上进行了测试。结果 西班牙语版的 BBT 包括一个新的测试材料部分,以及一个用于计算从盒子的一个隔间转移到另一个隔间的积木数量的记录。在试点研究之后,对术语进行了修改,以指代惯用手和非惯用手。结论 我们的研究结果表明,西班牙语版的 BBT 适合用于评估患有 ABI 的西班牙语成人的手部灵活性。
{"title":"Spanish translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Box and Block Test: a pilot study in adults with chronic acquired brain injury.","authors":"María-Paula Noce, Desirée Valera-Gran, Miriam Hurtado-Pomares, Encarni Serrano-Reina, Carlos Soler-Pons, Eva-María Navarrete-Muñoz","doi":"10.1071/IB24014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The Box and Block Test (BBT) is a highly recommended outcome measure to assess unilateral gross motor activity of the upper limbs. The BBT has not previously been available in a version adapted to the Spanish context. Thus, this study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and translate the BBT's instructions and pilot test the Spanish version of BBT in adults with acquired brain injury (ABI). Methods The BBT was translated and cross-culturally adapted following standard procedures. An expert committee approved the final Spanish version of BBT and it was conceptually validated by four therapists with expertise in ABI. The tool was tested on 14 adults with ABI. Results The Spanish version of BBT included a new section of materials for the test and a record to count the number of blocks transferred from one compartment of the box to the other. Following the pilot study, a modification in terminology was implemented for referring to the dominant and non-dominant hands. Conclusions Our results suggest that the Spanish version of BBT is suitable for assessing manual dexterity in Spanish-speaking adults with ABI.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142333444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle McIntyre, Jennifer Cullen, Caoilfionn Turner, India Bohanna, Ali Lakhini, Kylie Rixon
Background Many Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples are exposed to risk factors for cognitive impairment. However, culturally appropriate methods for identifying potential cognitive impairment are lacking. This paper reports on the development of a screen and interview protocol designed to flag possible cognitive impairments and psychosocial disability in Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander adults over the age of 16years. Methods The Guddi Way screen includes items relating to cognition and mental functions across multiple cognitive domains. The screen is straightforward, brief, and able to be administered by non-clinicians with training. Results Early results suggest the Guddi Way screen is reliable and culturally acceptable, and correctly flags cognitive dysfunction among Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander adults. Conclusions The screen shows promise as a culturally appropriate and culturally developed method to identify the possibility of cognitive impairments and psychosocial disability in Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander adults. A flag on the Guddi Way screen indicates the need for referral to an experienced neuropsychologist or neuropsychiatrist for further assessment and can also assist in guiding support services.
背景 许多原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民都面临着认知障碍的风险因素。然而,目前还缺乏适合当地文化的方法来识别潜在的认知障碍。本文报告了一种筛查和访谈方案的开发情况,该方案旨在标记 16 岁以上土著居民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民成年人可能存在的认知障碍和社会心理残疾。方法 Guddi Way 筛查包括与多个认知领域的认知和心理功能有关的项目。该筛查简单明了,经过培训的非临床医生也能进行操作。结果 早期结果表明,Guddi Way 筛选结果可靠,文化上可接受,能正确显示原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民成年人的认知功能障碍。结论 Guddi Way 筛选是一种适合当地文化并由当地文化开发的方法,可用于识别土著居民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民成年人认知障碍和社会心理残疾的可能性。如果在 Guddi Way 筛选中出现标记,则表明需要转诊至经验丰富的神经心理学家或神经精神病学家进行进一步评估,同时也有助于指导支持服务。
{"title":"The development of a cognitive screening protocol for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples: the Guddi Way screen.","authors":"Michelle McIntyre, Jennifer Cullen, Caoilfionn Turner, India Bohanna, Ali Lakhini, Kylie Rixon","doi":"10.1071/IB23058","DOIUrl":"10.1071/IB23058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Many Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples are exposed to risk factors for cognitive impairment. However, culturally appropriate methods for identifying potential cognitive impairment are lacking. This paper reports on the development of a screen and interview protocol designed to flag possible cognitive impairments and psychosocial disability in Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander adults over the age of 16years. Methods The Guddi Way screen includes items relating to cognition and mental functions across multiple cognitive domains. The screen is straightforward, brief, and able to be administered by non-clinicians with training. Results Early results suggest the Guddi Way screen is reliable and culturally acceptable, and correctly flags cognitive dysfunction among Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander adults. Conclusions The screen shows promise as a culturally appropriate and culturally developed method to identify the possibility of cognitive impairments and psychosocial disability in Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander adults. A flag on the Guddi Way screen indicates the need for referral to an experienced neuropsychologist or neuropsychiatrist for further assessment and can also assist in guiding support services.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lee Cubis, Sharyn McDonald, Pamela Dean, Robin Ramme, Kate D'Cruz, Megan Topping, Fiona Fisher, Di Winkler, Jacinta Douglas
Background People with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have unique housing and support needs that are essential for maintaining independence at home; however, there is limited research to guide the design of community living options for this population. The aim of this study was to examine housing and support needs and preferences of people with MS with the intention to inform the planning of a co-designed intervention based on the study's findings. Methods Using the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework, quantitative (n =79) and qualitative (n =6) data from people with MS were extracted and integrated from projects completed by the research team that explored the housing and support needs and preferences of people with disability. Results were synthesised and presented to a reference group for validation, contextualisation, and adaptation to the Australian context. Results High physical support needs were common across participants. People most commonly required home modifications to improve accessibility, such as ramps, equipment such as heating and cooling, and assistive technology. Many people required more than 8 hours per day of paid support. Moving into individualised housing facilitated independence and community reintegration. People reported gaps between what they wanted from support workers and what they received, citing individual and systemic barriers. Conclusion People with MS have support needs that require proactive and responsive funding arrangements, housing design and support provision. In line with KTA principles, findings will inform the planning of a co-designed intervention that involves people with lived experience of MS and other stakeholders to influence policy and improve home and living outcomes for this population.
{"title":"Using the Knowledge to Action framework to improve housing and support for people with Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Lee Cubis, Sharyn McDonald, Pamela Dean, Robin Ramme, Kate D'Cruz, Megan Topping, Fiona Fisher, Di Winkler, Jacinta Douglas","doi":"10.1071/IB23102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background People with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) have unique housing and support needs that are essential for maintaining independence at home; however, there is limited research to guide the design of community living options for this population. The aim of this study was to examine housing and support needs and preferences of people with MS with the intention to inform the planning of a co-designed intervention based on the study's findings. Methods Using the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework, quantitative (n =79) and qualitative (n =6) data from people with MS were extracted and integrated from projects completed by the research team that explored the housing and support needs and preferences of people with disability. Results were synthesised and presented to a reference group for validation, contextualisation, and adaptation to the Australian context. Results High physical support needs were common across participants. People most commonly required home modifications to improve accessibility, such as ramps, equipment such as heating and cooling, and assistive technology. Many people required more than 8 hours per day of paid support. Moving into individualised housing facilitated independence and community reintegration. People reported gaps between what they wanted from support workers and what they received, citing individual and systemic barriers. Conclusion People with MS have support needs that require proactive and responsive funding arrangements, housing design and support provision. In line with KTA principles, findings will inform the planning of a co-designed intervention that involves people with lived experience of MS and other stakeholders to influence policy and improve home and living outcomes for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jacqueline Wheatcroft, Rebecca J Nicks, Laura Jolliffe, Danielle Sansonetti, Carolyn Unsworth, Natasha A Lannin
Background Understanding cognitive impairments is essential for effective rehabilitation and discharge planning for adults with neurological conditions. The aim of this study was to identify barriers to completing standardised cognitive assessments and evaluate the implementation of an intervention to support practice change. Methods A mixed-methods approach was applied to translate cognitive assessment recommendations into clinical practice using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour model (COM-B) theories. Occupational therapists at one metropolitan health service in Australia were invited to participate. Pre- and post-implementation file audits and surveys were conducted, along with focus groups that collected qualitative data analysed using the TDF and COM-B. Results Survey 1 (n =40) and focus group data (n =24) identified barriers in the TDF domains of knowledge (selection of assessments), environment and resources (equipment and time constraints), and social influences (pressure from other disciplines). To address barriers to implementing a cognitive assessment framework, scripts, cue cards, video-recorded training, and posters were developed as guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Survey 2 showed increased capability to physically administer cognitive assessments (53-74%) and improved clinician understanding of relevant clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations (22-50%). File audit data indicated a 30% increase in the number of standardised assessments completed. Conclusions The application of two implementation theories led to the development of an intervention that increased occupational therapists' confidence and their adherence to CPG recommendations. This study serves as a potential model for using the TDF and COM-B to create implementation interventions in various clinical practice areas.
{"title":"Applying implementation science theories to support practice change in the assessment of cognition by occupational therapists.","authors":"Jacqueline Wheatcroft, Rebecca J Nicks, Laura Jolliffe, Danielle Sansonetti, Carolyn Unsworth, Natasha A Lannin","doi":"10.1071/IB23105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Understanding cognitive impairments is essential for effective rehabilitation and discharge planning for adults with neurological conditions. The aim of this study was to identify barriers to completing standardised cognitive assessments and evaluate the implementation of an intervention to support practice change. Methods A mixed-methods approach was applied to translate cognitive assessment recommendations into clinical practice using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour model (COM-B) theories. Occupational therapists at one metropolitan health service in Australia were invited to participate. Pre- and post-implementation file audits and surveys were conducted, along with focus groups that collected qualitative data analysed using the TDF and COM-B. Results Survey 1 (n =40) and focus group data (n =24) identified barriers in the TDF domains of knowledge (selection of assessments), environment and resources (equipment and time constraints), and social influences (pressure from other disciplines). To address barriers to implementing a cognitive assessment framework, scripts, cue cards, video-recorded training, and posters were developed as guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Survey 2 showed increased capability to physically administer cognitive assessments (53-74%) and improved clinician understanding of relevant clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations (22-50%). File audit data indicated a 30% increase in the number of standardised assessments completed. Conclusions The application of two implementation theories led to the development of an intervention that increased occupational therapists' confidence and their adherence to CPG recommendations. This study serves as a potential model for using the TDF and COM-B to create implementation interventions in various clinical practice areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142115509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background Stroke survivors are a population at increased risk of experiencing loneliness, thus exploring the effect of lockdown measures on stroke survivors is of paramount importance. We explored the personal experiences of loneliness among stroke survivors during lockdown in the COVID-19 pandemic and the lessons that can be learned from these experiences. Methods Seventeen stroke survivors from across the United Kingdom (10 females, 7 males; 45-83years old; M age =63.47) participated in semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed in the interpretation of the data. Results Three overarching themes were constructed: (1) hidden struggles, isolated lives; (2) divergent experiences and adaptations; and (3) rebuilding after lockdown. These themes explore survivors' experiences of loneliness generally after stroke and how this loneliness was assuaged with online video conferencing and other technological solutions. They also chronicle how these feelings changed during lockdown and survivors' feelings regarding society returning to 'normal' and the associated apprehension and anxiety this brings. Conclusions We recommend a focus on improving understanding of the challenges faced after stroke to reduce stigma, increase empathy and promote inclusive attitudes within society, alongside better pandemic preparedness through engagement with hybrid support solutions.
{"title":"Life after lockdown: loneliness, exclusion and the impact of hidden disability.","authors":"Chloe Bradbury, Abbey Fletcher, Stephen Dunne","doi":"10.1071/IB23111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Stroke survivors are a population at increased risk of experiencing loneliness, thus exploring the effect of lockdown measures on stroke survivors is of paramount importance. We explored the personal experiences of loneliness among stroke survivors during lockdown in the COVID-19 pandemic and the lessons that can be learned from these experiences. Methods Seventeen stroke survivors from across the United Kingdom (10 females, 7 males; 45-83years old; M age =63.47) participated in semi-structured interviews. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed in the interpretation of the data. Results Three overarching themes were constructed: (1) hidden struggles, isolated lives; (2) divergent experiences and adaptations; and (3) rebuilding after lockdown. These themes explore survivors' experiences of loneliness generally after stroke and how this loneliness was assuaged with online video conferencing and other technological solutions. They also chronicle how these feelings changed during lockdown and survivors' feelings regarding society returning to 'normal' and the associated apprehension and anxiety this brings. Conclusions We recommend a focus on improving understanding of the challenges faced after stroke to reduce stigma, increase empathy and promote inclusive attitudes within society, alongside better pandemic preparedness through engagement with hybrid support solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"25 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141322137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}