Successful Implementation of Blast Joint Perforation Technology in a Dual String Completion

Ifeanyichukwu Ofia, Esther Briggs, V. Longe, Ricky Iyengumwena, Dominic Wong
{"title":"Successful Implementation of Blast Joint Perforation Technology in a Dual String Completion","authors":"Ifeanyichukwu Ofia, Esther Briggs, V. Longe, Ricky Iyengumwena, Dominic Wong","doi":"10.2118/207175-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The results of computer simulations and laboratory tests have been applied at Porth field in Nigeria to achieve a successful perforation through a blast joint to access hydrocarbon behind pipe.\n Accessing hydrocarbons behind pipe in multizone completions can be difficult. The options are; an expensive rig-based workover or a cost-effective, rigless, through-tubing perforation. For a rigless through-tubing option, the detonated perforation charges must pass through a blast joint, the casing and the cement and then into the target reservoir. The major concern is usually whether there will be enough penetration {Burky 2018} into the target reservoir interval, given the layers of material resistance that the charges will have to overcome, starting at the blast joint. The Blast joint has a higher wall thickness and a larger outer diameter than that of the conventional tubing string to mitigate against erosion from producing the target interval behind pipe. The goal in perforation operations is achieving the maximum production while reducing perforation damage. {Jackson 2016}.\n Computer simulations and laboratory tests for a well at Porth field in Nigeria were carried out to determine the potential for successful perforation through a blast joint to access hydrocarbon behind pipe. Coupon tests using different gun sizes and charges where simulated and tested to ascertain the most effective option to achieve the desired reservoir penetration. Both computer simulations and laboratory test results showed that a reasonable depth of penetration into the target reservoir interval was possible to achieve. The perforation job using a 1.56-in., six-shots-per-foot (6 spf), 60° phasing gun was successfully carried out and the well has been tested to a potential of 780bbl/d at a tubing head pressure of 943psi and choke size 20/64th.\n This success lays the foundation for going after other similar opportunities locked in behind-pipe previously thought inaccessible owing to the presence of a blast joint across the target interval. Associated rig costs for a workover of up to $10 million can be saved on each opportunity using this approach.","PeriodicalId":10899,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, August 03, 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, August 03, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207175-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of computer simulations and laboratory tests have been applied at Porth field in Nigeria to achieve a successful perforation through a blast joint to access hydrocarbon behind pipe. Accessing hydrocarbons behind pipe in multizone completions can be difficult. The options are; an expensive rig-based workover or a cost-effective, rigless, through-tubing perforation. For a rigless through-tubing option, the detonated perforation charges must pass through a blast joint, the casing and the cement and then into the target reservoir. The major concern is usually whether there will be enough penetration {Burky 2018} into the target reservoir interval, given the layers of material resistance that the charges will have to overcome, starting at the blast joint. The Blast joint has a higher wall thickness and a larger outer diameter than that of the conventional tubing string to mitigate against erosion from producing the target interval behind pipe. The goal in perforation operations is achieving the maximum production while reducing perforation damage. {Jackson 2016}. Computer simulations and laboratory tests for a well at Porth field in Nigeria were carried out to determine the potential for successful perforation through a blast joint to access hydrocarbon behind pipe. Coupon tests using different gun sizes and charges where simulated and tested to ascertain the most effective option to achieve the desired reservoir penetration. Both computer simulations and laboratory test results showed that a reasonable depth of penetration into the target reservoir interval was possible to achieve. The perforation job using a 1.56-in., six-shots-per-foot (6 spf), 60° phasing gun was successfully carried out and the well has been tested to a potential of 780bbl/d at a tubing head pressure of 943psi and choke size 20/64th. This success lays the foundation for going after other similar opportunities locked in behind-pipe previously thought inaccessible owing to the presence of a blast joint across the target interval. Associated rig costs for a workover of up to $10 million can be saved on each opportunity using this approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在双管柱完井中成功实施爆破节射孔技术
计算机模拟和实验室测试的结果已应用于尼日利亚的Porth油田,通过一个爆炸节成功射孔,获得了油管后的碳氢化合物。在多层完井中,获取油管后的碳氢化合物是很困难的。选项是;昂贵的钻机修井或经济高效的无钻机过油管射孔作业。对于无钻机直通油管方案,引爆的射孔药必须穿过爆破节、套管和水泥,然后进入目标储层。考虑到从爆破接合处开始,装药必须克服的材料阻力层,主要的问题通常是是否能够充分穿透目标储层。与传统管柱相比,防爆接头具有更高的壁厚和更大的外径,以减轻生产管柱后目标段的侵蚀。射孔作业的目标是在减少射孔损害的同时实现最大产量。杰克逊{2016}。对尼日利亚Porth油田的一口井进行了计算机模拟和实验室测试,以确定通过爆破节成功射孔以获取管后油气的可能性。通过模拟和测试不同射孔枪尺寸和装药的组合测试,以确定实现预期储层穿透的最有效方案。计算机模拟和实验室测试结果都表明,在目标储层中可以实现合理的渗透深度。射孔作业使用的是1.56英寸的射孔管。该井在油管头压力为943psi、节流口尺寸为20/64的条件下,成功地进行了60°相位枪的测试,产量达到780桶/天。这一成功为寻找其他类似的机会奠定了基础,这些机会被锁定在管后,以前由于目标段存在爆炸接头而无法获得。使用这种方法,每次修井作业可节省高达1000万美元的钻机成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Production and Performance Evaluation of Biodetergents as an Alternative to Conventional Drilling Detergent Comparative Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Drilling Rate of Penetration Prediction The Limitation of Reservoir Saturation Logging Tool in a Case of a Deeper Reservoir Flow into a Shallower Reservoir Within the Same Wellbore Surrogate-Based Analysis of Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery – A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Model Performance Understanding the Impacts of Backpressure & Risk Analysis of Different Gas Hydrate Blockage Scenarios on the Integrity of Subsea Flowlines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1