Revisiting the relationship between idiosyncratic risk and stock returns: a quantile regression analysis in the context of an emerging market

Saif Ullah, Mehwish Jabeen, Muhammad Farooq, Asad Afzal Hamayun
{"title":"Revisiting the relationship between idiosyncratic risk and stock returns: a quantile regression analysis in the context of an emerging market","authors":"Saif Ullah, Mehwish Jabeen, Muhammad Farooq, Asad Afzal Hamayun","doi":"10.1108/jeas-03-2023-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe relationship between idiosyncratic risk and stock return has been debated for decades; this study reexamined this relationship in the Pakistani stock market by using the quantile regression approach along with the prospect theory.Design/methodology/approachThe present study is quantitative, and secondary data obtained from an emerging market are used. The quantile regression method allows the estimates of idiosyncratic risk to vary across the entire distribution of stock returns, i.e. the dependent variable. In this study, the standard deviation of regression residuals from the Fama and French three-factor model was used to measure idiosyncratic risk. Convenience sampling is employed; the sample consists of 82 firms listed on the KSE-100 index, with 820 annual observations for the ten years from 2011 to 2020. After computing results by using quantile regression, the study's findings, ordinary least squares (OLS) and least sum of absolute deviation (LAD) regression techniques are also compared.FindingsThe quantile regression estimation results indicate that idiosyncratic risk is positively correlated with stock returns and that this relationship is contingent on whether prices are rising or falling. Consistent with the prospect theory, the finding suggests that stock investors tend to avoid risk when they anticipate a loss but are more willing to take risks when they anticipate a profit. The results of the OLS and LAD regressions indicate that the method typically employed in previous studies does not adequately describe the relationship between idiosyncratic risk and stock return at extreme points or across the entire distribution of stock return.Originality/valueThese empirical findings shed new light on the relationship between idiosyncratic risk and stock return in Pakistani stock market literature.","PeriodicalId":44018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-03-2023-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe relationship between idiosyncratic risk and stock return has been debated for decades; this study reexamined this relationship in the Pakistani stock market by using the quantile regression approach along with the prospect theory.Design/methodology/approachThe present study is quantitative, and secondary data obtained from an emerging market are used. The quantile regression method allows the estimates of idiosyncratic risk to vary across the entire distribution of stock returns, i.e. the dependent variable. In this study, the standard deviation of regression residuals from the Fama and French three-factor model was used to measure idiosyncratic risk. Convenience sampling is employed; the sample consists of 82 firms listed on the KSE-100 index, with 820 annual observations for the ten years from 2011 to 2020. After computing results by using quantile regression, the study's findings, ordinary least squares (OLS) and least sum of absolute deviation (LAD) regression techniques are also compared.FindingsThe quantile regression estimation results indicate that idiosyncratic risk is positively correlated with stock returns and that this relationship is contingent on whether prices are rising or falling. Consistent with the prospect theory, the finding suggests that stock investors tend to avoid risk when they anticipate a loss but are more willing to take risks when they anticipate a profit. The results of the OLS and LAD regressions indicate that the method typically employed in previous studies does not adequately describe the relationship between idiosyncratic risk and stock return at extreme points or across the entire distribution of stock return.Originality/valueThese empirical findings shed new light on the relationship between idiosyncratic risk and stock return in Pakistani stock market literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视特殊风险与股票回报之间的关系:新兴市场背景下的分位数回归分析
目的:特质风险与股票收益之间的关系已经争论了几十年;本研究采用分位数回归方法和前景理论对巴基斯坦股市的这种关系进行了重新检验。设计/方法/方法本研究是定量的,并使用了从新兴市场获得的二手数据。分位数回归方法允许对特质风险的估计在股票收益的整个分布中变化,即因变量。在本研究中,使用Fama和French三因素模型的回归残差的标准差来衡量特质风险。采用方便抽样;样本包括82家在KSE-100指数上市的公司,从2011年到2020年的十年中有820个年度观察。在分位数回归计算结果后,对研究结果与普通最小二乘(OLS)和最小绝对偏差和(LAD)回归技术进行了比较。结果分位数回归估计结果表明,特质风险与股票收益正相关,这种关系取决于价格是上涨还是下跌。与前景理论一致,这一发现表明,股票投资者在预期亏损时倾向于避免风险,而在预期盈利时更愿意承担风险。OLS和LAD回归的结果表明,以往研究中通常采用的方法不能充分描述极端点或整个股票收益分布的特质风险与股票收益之间的关系。这些实证研究结果揭示了巴基斯坦股市文献中特质风险与股票回报之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
83
期刊最新文献
Understanding the impact of ethical leadership on followers' voice: mediation of moral identity and moderation of proactive personality Do agency costs and business risk affect the corporate sustainability–financial performance relationship? Investigating nostalgia’s influence on brand love Influence of governance indicators on public debt accumulation in Africa Analysing volatility patterns in emerging markets: symmetric or asymmetric models?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1