Crowd social pressure in the Brazilian soccer league: testing home advantage and referees’ bias during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/1612197X.2022.2084763
B. Couto, M. Sayers
{"title":"Crowd social pressure in the Brazilian soccer league: testing home advantage and referees’ bias during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"B. Couto, M. Sayers","doi":"10.1080/1612197X.2022.2084763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although the home advantage is a well-documented phenomenon in soccer, the effect of the home crowd social pressure on teams and referees’ performance remains unclear. The COVID-19 pandemic brought a unique opportunity to test the real effect of the crowd. The aim of the present study was to analyse the home advantage and referee bias in the Brazilian soccer league, comparing whole seasons played with and without spectators. Match data from 2003 to 2020 were compared. The points earned, victories, and goals scored were used to analyse teams’ performance. Referee bias was investigated by the extra time, yellow and red cards awarded. Difference of points and victories, between home and away teams, during the 2020 season was similar to most of the previous seasons and showed a decreasing tendency throughout the seasons. When comparing the 2019 and 2020 seasons, the home advantage, measured by the relative number of points won at home, was present in games played with (60.9 ± 7.7%) and without (60.4 ± 6.3%) spectators. Home teams showed higher number of victories, total points, and goals scored (p < 0.001 each). Away teams were awarded with a higher number of yellow cards (p = 0.008), but this number was smaller during the pandemic (p = 0.049). Games played with spectators received less minutes of extra time in the second half when away teams were losing by a difference of one goal (p = 0.012). In conclusion, the absence of spectators in the Brazilian soccer league during the COVID-19 pandemic did not reduce the home advantage but affected the referee bias.","PeriodicalId":47505,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"7 1","pages":"673 - 688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2022.2084763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although the home advantage is a well-documented phenomenon in soccer, the effect of the home crowd social pressure on teams and referees’ performance remains unclear. The COVID-19 pandemic brought a unique opportunity to test the real effect of the crowd. The aim of the present study was to analyse the home advantage and referee bias in the Brazilian soccer league, comparing whole seasons played with and without spectators. Match data from 2003 to 2020 were compared. The points earned, victories, and goals scored were used to analyse teams’ performance. Referee bias was investigated by the extra time, yellow and red cards awarded. Difference of points and victories, between home and away teams, during the 2020 season was similar to most of the previous seasons and showed a decreasing tendency throughout the seasons. When comparing the 2019 and 2020 seasons, the home advantage, measured by the relative number of points won at home, was present in games played with (60.9 ± 7.7%) and without (60.4 ± 6.3%) spectators. Home teams showed higher number of victories, total points, and goals scored (p < 0.001 each). Away teams were awarded with a higher number of yellow cards (p = 0.008), but this number was smaller during the pandemic (p = 0.049). Games played with spectators received less minutes of extra time in the second half when away teams were losing by a difference of one goal (p = 0.012). In conclusion, the absence of spectators in the Brazilian soccer league during the COVID-19 pandemic did not reduce the home advantage but affected the referee bias.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西足球联赛中的人群社会压力:在COVID-19大流行期间测试主场优势和裁判偏见
虽然主场优势是足球界一个众所周知的现象,但主场人群的社会压力对球队和裁判表现的影响尚不清楚。COVID-19大流行为测试人群的真实效果提供了独特的机会。本研究的目的是分析巴西足球联赛的主场优势和裁判偏见,比较有观众和没有观众的整个赛季。比较了2003年至2020年的比赛数据。得分、胜利和进球被用来分析球队的表现。裁判偏见在加时赛中被调查,黄牌和红牌被判。2020赛季,主客场球队的积分和胜率之差与之前的大部分赛季相似,在整个赛季中呈下降趋势。对比2019赛季和2020赛季,在有(60.9±7.7%)观众的比赛和没有(60.4±6.3%)观众的比赛中,主场优势(以主场获得的相对分数衡量)都存在。主队的胜率、总得分和进球数均高于主队(p < 0.001)。客队得到的黄牌数量较多(p = 0.008),但在大流行期间这个数字较少(p = 0.049)。在有观众的比赛中,当客队以1球的差距输球时,下半场加时赛的时间会减少(p = 0.012)。综上所述,在新冠疫情期间,巴西足球联赛中没有观众,但这并没有减少主场优势,反而影响了裁判的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology (IJSEP) is sponsored by the International Society of Sport and Exercise Psychology (ISSP). Primary purposes of IJSEP are to promote understanding of sport psychology research and practice around the world, enhance theoretical and practical knowledge in these fields and promote high-quality scientific and applied work in sport and exercise psychology. Sections in the Journal are devoted to areas including group dynamics, moral and ethical issues, social aspects in sport and exercise, and biological aspects of behavior.
期刊最新文献
Promote “ we ” to inspire me: examining the roles of group identification and trust in the association between identity leadership and follower inspiration Stress, recovery, and team closeness: a case study of a 25-day ultra-endurance open-water swim in the Rhine River A thematic-synthesis of self-care in sport psychology practitioners “They learn quickly there are consequences for their actions”: youth sport coaches’ perspectives on the effects of benching “We signed up for it”: a qualitative examination of job resources in elite sport support staff members
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1