{"title":"Hybridisation of picoeukaryotes by eubacterial probes is widespread in the marine environment","authors":"I. Biegala, M. Cuttle, I. Mary, M. Zubkov","doi":"10.3354/AME041293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most general and group-specific eubacterial probes hybridised picoeukaryotes in\ncoastal waters (Brittany, France) and cultures of the dominant picoeukaryotes from this environment (Micromonas pusilla and Pelagomonas calceolata). This is either because they matched the 16S rRNA from organelles or because of the presence of symbiotic or antagonist intracellular bacteria. The general eubacterial probe (EUB338) hybridised 84% of the picoeukaryotes, while the group-specific probes hybridised 3, 16, 10 and 34% of the picoeukaryotes for cyanobacteria (CYA664), alphaproteobacteria (ALF968), gamma-proteobacteria (GAM42a) and Cytophaga-Flavo-Bacteria (CF319), respectively. The results show that the hybridisation of eukaryote 16S rRNA by prokaryote probes can lead to significant errors in prokaryote counts, in particular for less well-represented groups such as cyanobacteria, with errors of 17% in the studied sample. In addition, we revealed for the first time at this scale that up to 44% of the picoeukaryotes contained intracellular prokaryotes. This finding might have serious implications for understanding the functioning of the microbial loop. Finally, because SSU rRNA databases have significantly been extended in recent years, we showed that the\nprobe PLA886, which targets Planctomycete 16S rRNA, labelled 87% of the picoeukaryotes by hybridising their 18S rRNA. Consequently, the design of this probe should be refined for future studies, and the presence of similar changes in probe specificity should be checked regularly when using hybridisation-based techniques.","PeriodicalId":8112,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Microbial Ecology","volume":"16 1","pages":"293-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Microbial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/AME041293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Most general and group-specific eubacterial probes hybridised picoeukaryotes in
coastal waters (Brittany, France) and cultures of the dominant picoeukaryotes from this environment (Micromonas pusilla and Pelagomonas calceolata). This is either because they matched the 16S rRNA from organelles or because of the presence of symbiotic or antagonist intracellular bacteria. The general eubacterial probe (EUB338) hybridised 84% of the picoeukaryotes, while the group-specific probes hybridised 3, 16, 10 and 34% of the picoeukaryotes for cyanobacteria (CYA664), alphaproteobacteria (ALF968), gamma-proteobacteria (GAM42a) and Cytophaga-Flavo-Bacteria (CF319), respectively. The results show that the hybridisation of eukaryote 16S rRNA by prokaryote probes can lead to significant errors in prokaryote counts, in particular for less well-represented groups such as cyanobacteria, with errors of 17% in the studied sample. In addition, we revealed for the first time at this scale that up to 44% of the picoeukaryotes contained intracellular prokaryotes. This finding might have serious implications for understanding the functioning of the microbial loop. Finally, because SSU rRNA databases have significantly been extended in recent years, we showed that the
probe PLA886, which targets Planctomycete 16S rRNA, labelled 87% of the picoeukaryotes by hybridising their 18S rRNA. Consequently, the design of this probe should be refined for future studies, and the presence of similar changes in probe specificity should be checked regularly when using hybridisation-based techniques.
期刊介绍:
AME is international and interdisciplinary. It presents rigorously refereed and carefully selected Research Articles, Reviews and Notes, as well as Comments/Reply Comments (for details see AME 27:209), Opinion Pieces (previously called ''As I See It'') and AME Specials. For details consult the Guidelines for Authors. Papers may be concerned with:
Tolerances and responses of microorganisms to variations in abiotic and biotic components of their environment; microbial life under extreme environmental conditions (climate, temperature, pressure, osmolarity, redox, etc.).
Role of aquatic microorganisms in the production, transformation and decomposition of organic matter; flow patterns of energy and matter as these pass through microorganisms; population dynamics; trophic interrelationships; modelling, both theoretical and via computer simulation, of individual microorganisms and microbial populations; biodiversity.
Absorption and transformation of inorganic material; synthesis and transformation of organic material (autotrophic and heterotrophic); non-genetic and genetic adaptation; behaviour; molecular microbial ecology; symbioses.