"The farm has an insatiable appetite": A food justice approach to understanding beginning farmer stress

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.5304/jafscd.2023.123.011
F. Doherty, Rachel Tayse, Michelle L. Kaiser, Smitha Rao
{"title":"\"The farm has an insatiable appetite\": A food justice approach to understanding beginning farmer stress","authors":"F. Doherty, Rachel Tayse, Michelle L. Kaiser, Smitha Rao","doi":"10.5304/jafscd.2023.123.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beginning farmers are critical in shaping resilient food systems amid a worsening climate crisis. Reports indicate a prevalence of stress and adverse mental health outcomes among U.S. farmers, yet there are gaps in the literature concerning the well-being of beginning farmers, a heterogeneous group with a growing number of women and BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, or People of Color) producers. The agricultural industry has a legacy of systemic oppression and exploitation of marginal commu­nities. Thus, it is important to understand the unique needs of an emerging, more diverse generation of farmers, especially as discrimination is associated with stress and poor mental health outcomes. In this community-engaged, mixed methods research project, we utilize a food justice framework to understand systemic stressors and coping strategies among Midwestern beginning farmers. Beginning farmers in the Midwest were recruited using pur­posive sampling to participate in quantitative surveys and in-depth interviews. The survey (n=62) included measures of farm stress, mental health supports, and farm charac­teristics; the Patient Health Questionnaire-4; and socio­demographic information. Interviews (n=20) were conducted to establish a deeper under­standing of stress and mental health experiences. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Inter­views were analyzed using thematic analysis. Top stressors included having too much to do and too little time, COVID-19, not enough person-power on the farm, climate change, and social justice. Of survey respondents, 58% reported mild to severe symptom burden of anxiety or depression. Five qualita­tive themes emerged, including the stress of capitalism, discrimination and inequitable access to resources, aids and gaps in social support, rugged individ­ualism, and heterogeneous perspectives on social justice and climate change. Four transfor­mative food justice practices aimed at rectifying structural inequalities inform our implications. Our results emphasize the urgency of systemic change and structural support for beginning farmers.","PeriodicalId":51829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.123.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beginning farmers are critical in shaping resilient food systems amid a worsening climate crisis. Reports indicate a prevalence of stress and adverse mental health outcomes among U.S. farmers, yet there are gaps in the literature concerning the well-being of beginning farmers, a heterogeneous group with a growing number of women and BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, or People of Color) producers. The agricultural industry has a legacy of systemic oppression and exploitation of marginal commu­nities. Thus, it is important to understand the unique needs of an emerging, more diverse generation of farmers, especially as discrimination is associated with stress and poor mental health outcomes. In this community-engaged, mixed methods research project, we utilize a food justice framework to understand systemic stressors and coping strategies among Midwestern beginning farmers. Beginning farmers in the Midwest were recruited using pur­posive sampling to participate in quantitative surveys and in-depth interviews. The survey (n=62) included measures of farm stress, mental health supports, and farm charac­teristics; the Patient Health Questionnaire-4; and socio­demographic information. Interviews (n=20) were conducted to establish a deeper under­standing of stress and mental health experiences. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Inter­views were analyzed using thematic analysis. Top stressors included having too much to do and too little time, COVID-19, not enough person-power on the farm, climate change, and social justice. Of survey respondents, 58% reported mild to severe symptom burden of anxiety or depression. Five qualita­tive themes emerged, including the stress of capitalism, discrimination and inequitable access to resources, aids and gaps in social support, rugged individ­ualism, and heterogeneous perspectives on social justice and climate change. Four transfor­mative food justice practices aimed at rectifying structural inequalities inform our implications. Our results emphasize the urgency of systemic change and structural support for beginning farmers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“农场有贪得无厌的胃口”:一种理解农民压力的食物正义方法
在日益恶化的气候危机中,初级农民对于塑造有抵御力的粮食系统至关重要。报告显示压力和不良心理健康结果在美国农民中普遍存在,但关于新农民的福祉的文献存在空白,新农民是一个异质群体,越来越多的妇女和BIPOC(黑人、土著或有色人种)生产者。农业产业遗留下了对边缘社区的系统性压迫和剥削。因此,重要的是要了解新兴的、更加多样化的一代农民的独特需求,特别是因为歧视与压力和不良心理健康结果有关。在这个社区参与的混合方法研究项目中,我们利用食物正义框架来了解中西部初级农民的系统性压力源和应对策略。在中西部地区,我们采用正目的抽样方法招募初学农民参与定量调查和深度访谈。调查(n=62)包括农场压力、心理健康支持和农场特征的测量;患者健康问卷-4;以及社会人口统计信息。进行访谈(n=20)以建立对压力和心理健康经历的更深入了解。调查数据采用描述性统计进行分析。访谈观点采用主题分析进行分析。最大的压力源包括要做的事情太多,时间太少,2019冠状病毒病,农场人力不足,气候变化和社会正义。在调查对象中,58%的人报告有轻微到严重的焦虑或抑郁症状负担。五个定性主题出现了,包括资本主义的压力,歧视和资源获取的不公平,援助和社会支持的差距,顽固的个人主义,以及对社会正义和气候变化的异质观点。旨在纠正结构性不平等的四种变革性粮食司法实践说明了我们的影响。我们的研究结果强调了对新手农民进行系统性变革和结构性支持的紧迫性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, attitudes, and experiences between food system and non-food system essential workers. Engaging, empowering, and evaluating farm-to-school projects with photovoice Appetizers in development economics Nourishing hope: Unraveling the path to justice in the global food system Treatment of racism and social injustice in addressing complex topics: What we learned
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1