How effective are social safety net programs in reducing poverty risks? A comparative study of Taiwan and Southeast China

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Asian Public Policy Pub Date : 2021-05-10 DOI:10.1080/17516234.2021.1920328
J. Wang, Yixia Cai, Q. Gao
{"title":"How effective are social safety net programs in reducing poverty risks? A comparative study of Taiwan and Southeast China","authors":"J. Wang, Yixia Cai, Q. Gao","doi":"10.1080/17516234.2021.1920328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using the harmonized Panel Study on Family Dynamics 2006, 2011, and 2013/14 data, this is the first study to examine poverty patterns and investigate the role of social safety nets in alleviating poverty over time in East Asia through a comparative lens, focusing on Taiwan and southeast (SE) China. We compared the extent to which public transfers alleviate poverty utilizing multilevel regression models. Our findings indicate that, firstly, the extent of poverty increased at a faster rate in rural areas and among migrants in SE China compared to residents in Taiwan and urban SE China, suggesting widening regional inequality. Secondly, social safety nets reduced poverty in all locations, and the reductions increased over time to a greater extent in rural areas and among migrants in SE China. However, such reductions remained insufficient to narrow the disparity in regional poverty trends. Thirdly, social safety nets in SE China lagged behind Taiwan’s on participation rates in elder, disability and education assistance and led in low-income assistance. Finally, although welfare policy design is more generous in Taiwan than SE China, our findings based on welfare outcomes indicate that Taiwan’s safety net did not alleviate poverty to a greater extent compared to SE China’s.","PeriodicalId":45051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","volume":"29 1","pages":"338 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2021.1920328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using the harmonized Panel Study on Family Dynamics 2006, 2011, and 2013/14 data, this is the first study to examine poverty patterns and investigate the role of social safety nets in alleviating poverty over time in East Asia through a comparative lens, focusing on Taiwan and southeast (SE) China. We compared the extent to which public transfers alleviate poverty utilizing multilevel regression models. Our findings indicate that, firstly, the extent of poverty increased at a faster rate in rural areas and among migrants in SE China compared to residents in Taiwan and urban SE China, suggesting widening regional inequality. Secondly, social safety nets reduced poverty in all locations, and the reductions increased over time to a greater extent in rural areas and among migrants in SE China. However, such reductions remained insufficient to narrow the disparity in regional poverty trends. Thirdly, social safety nets in SE China lagged behind Taiwan’s on participation rates in elder, disability and education assistance and led in low-income assistance. Finally, although welfare policy design is more generous in Taiwan than SE China, our findings based on welfare outcomes indicate that Taiwan’s safety net did not alleviate poverty to a greater extent compared to SE China’s.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会安全网项目在减少贫困风险方面的效果如何?台湾与中国东南地区的比较研究
本文采用2006年、2011年和2013/14年家庭动态协调小组研究的数据,首次以台湾和中国东南部为研究对象,通过比较视角考察东亚地区的贫困模式和社会保障网络在缓解贫困方面的作用。我们利用多层回归模型比较了公共转移支付减轻贫困的程度。我们的研究结果表明,首先,与台湾和中国东南部城市居民相比,中国东南部农村地区和移民的贫困程度增长速度更快,这表明区域不平等正在扩大。其次,社会安全网在所有地区都减少了贫困,而且随着时间的推移,农村地区和中国东南部的流动人口的减少幅度更大。但是,这种减少仍然不足以缩小区域贫穷趋势的差距。第三,中国东南地区的社会安全网在老年人、残疾人和教育援助的参与率方面落后于台湾,在低收入援助方面领先。最后,虽然台湾的福利政策设计比中国东南更慷慨,但我们基于福利结果的研究结果表明,台湾的安全网在减轻贫困方面并不比中国东南更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The effect of incentives and procedure simplification in policy implementation: evidence from a survey experiment on waste sorting Situated usage of generative AI in policy education: implications for teaching, learning, and research Scaling up policy entrepreneurship strategies from the local to the national level: the unlikely rise of basic income from agenda universe to decision agenda Unveiling the impact of policy entrepreneurs on South Korea’s social economy: a media analysis Digital regulation, enforcement attitudes, and discretionary decision-making of regulatory street-level bureaucrats during a pandemic emergency: an experimental study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1