Evaluation of COPD Chronic Care Management Collaborative to Reduce Emergency Department and Hospital Revisits Across U.S. Hospitals.

V. Press, Kelly H. Randall, Amber Hanser
{"title":"Evaluation of COPD Chronic Care Management Collaborative to Reduce Emergency Department and Hospital Revisits Across U.S. Hospitals.","authors":"V. Press, Kelly H. Randall, Amber Hanser","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the third-leading cause of early readmissions. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid instituted a financial penalty for excessive COPD readmissions galvanizing hospitals to implement effective strategies to reduce readmissions. We evaluated a 6-month COPD Chronic Care Management Collaborative to support hospitals to reduce preventable COPD-related revisits.\n\n\nMethods\nSites were recruited among nearly 300 Vizient members. The Collaborative used performance improvement initiatives to assist with implementation of effective strategies. Participants submitted performance data for two outcome measures: emergency department (ED) and hospital revisits.\n\n\nResults\nForty-seven members enrolled (Part I+II: n=33; Part I: n=3; Part II: n=11) of which 23 submitted data (n=23/47). The majority (n=19/23, 83%) reduced rates of COPD-related ED and/or hospital revisits. Among all 23 sites, the change in ED visits went from 11.05% to 10.87%; among 7 sites with reductions in ED visits, the reduction was 12.7% to 9%. Among all 23 sites, there were not reductions hospital readmissions (18.53% to 18.64%); among 7 sites with reductions, the readmission rate went from 20.1% to 15.6%. The mean reach across 17 hospitals reporting reach for their most successful measure at baseline was 35.2% (SD = 26.7%) and for the six reporting reach at follow-up was 73.8%% (SD = 18.3%); of note, only three sites submitted both baseline and follow-up data.\n\n\nConclusions\nThe Collaborative successfully supported the majority of sites to reduce COPD-related ED and/or hospital revisits using subject matter experts and coaching strategies to support hospitals' implementation of COPD quality improvement interventions.","PeriodicalId":10249,"journal":{"name":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the third-leading cause of early readmissions. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid instituted a financial penalty for excessive COPD readmissions galvanizing hospitals to implement effective strategies to reduce readmissions. We evaluated a 6-month COPD Chronic Care Management Collaborative to support hospitals to reduce preventable COPD-related revisits. Methods Sites were recruited among nearly 300 Vizient members. The Collaborative used performance improvement initiatives to assist with implementation of effective strategies. Participants submitted performance data for two outcome measures: emergency department (ED) and hospital revisits. Results Forty-seven members enrolled (Part I+II: n=33; Part I: n=3; Part II: n=11) of which 23 submitted data (n=23/47). The majority (n=19/23, 83%) reduced rates of COPD-related ED and/or hospital revisits. Among all 23 sites, the change in ED visits went from 11.05% to 10.87%; among 7 sites with reductions in ED visits, the reduction was 12.7% to 9%. Among all 23 sites, there were not reductions hospital readmissions (18.53% to 18.64%); among 7 sites with reductions, the readmission rate went from 20.1% to 15.6%. The mean reach across 17 hospitals reporting reach for their most successful measure at baseline was 35.2% (SD = 26.7%) and for the six reporting reach at follow-up was 73.8%% (SD = 18.3%); of note, only three sites submitted both baseline and follow-up data. Conclusions The Collaborative successfully supported the majority of sites to reduce COPD-related ED and/or hospital revisits using subject matter experts and coaching strategies to support hospitals' implementation of COPD quality improvement interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COPD慢性护理管理协作减少美国医院急诊科和医院复诊的评估
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是早期再入院的第三大原因。医疗保险和医疗补助中心制定了对慢性阻塞性肺病再入院人数过多的经济处罚,以激励医院实施有效的策略来减少再入院人数。我们评估了一个为期6个月的COPD慢性护理管理合作项目,以支持医院减少可预防的COPD相关复诊。方法在近300名Vizient会员中进行现场调查。协作团队使用绩效改进计划来协助有效策略的实施。参与者提交了两项结果测量指标的表现数据:急诊科(ED)和医院复诊。结果入组47例(第一部分+第二部分:n=33;第一部分:n=3;第二部分:n=11),其中23人提交了数据(n=23/47)。大多数(n=19/ 23,83%)降低了copd相关ED和/或医院复诊率。在所有23个站点中,急诊科访问量的变化从11.05%上升到10.87%;在急诊科就诊减少的7个地点中,减少幅度为12.7%至9%。在所有23个站点中,再入院率未降低(18.53% ~ 18.64%);在减少的7个站点中,再入院率从20.1%下降到15.6%。17家医院报告基线时最成功措施的平均达到率为35.2% (SD = 26.7%), 6家报告随访时达到率为73.8% (SD = 18.3%);值得注意的是,只有三个站点同时提交了基线和后续数据。通过使用主题专家和指导策略来支持医院实施COPD质量改善干预措施,协作成功地支持了大多数站点减少COPD相关ED和/或医院重访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Eosinophil Count Stability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a High Endemic Area of Parasitic Infection: A Prospective Study. Sexual Orientation Health Disparities in Chronic Respiratory Disorders. COPD: Iron Deficiency and Clinical Characteristics in Patients With and Without Chronic Respiratory Failure. Impact of Bronchiectasis on COPD Severity and Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency as a Risk Factor in Individuals with a Heavy Smoking History. Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Admissions, Health Status, and Behavioral Changes of Patients with COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1