Impact of Behavioral Biases and Decision Analysis Methods on Investment Performance of Individual Investors at PSX

Nasir Sharif Chauhdary, Bushra Ghufran, Maria Shams Khakwani
{"title":"Impact of Behavioral Biases and Decision Analysis Methods on Investment Performance of Individual Investors at PSX","authors":"Nasir Sharif Chauhdary, Bushra Ghufran, Maria Shams Khakwani","doi":"10.26710/jafee.v7i4.2103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Market bubbles and crashes remain unexplainable by classical finance theories. Because the history of the Pakistan Stock Exchange has been marked by occasional market bubbles and crashes, a behavioral study is conducted to investigate the impact of investor’s behavioral biases on investment performance. Design/Methodology/Approach: Our research investigates behavioral biases and examines the role of such biases in the selection of investment decision methods. We then investigate the direct impact of behavioral biases on investors' investment performance, as well as how investment analysis methods play a role in mediating the impact of behavioral biases on investment performance. We identified 11 irrational behavior biases based on existing literature and in-depth interviews with brokers, and two decision analysis methods are used: fundamental and technical. \nFindings: Our findings show that PSX investors exhibit moderately high levels of irrational behavior. Despite their moderately high level of irrationality, investors can use fundamental analysis to make better decisions and achieve better results. Since they use fundamental analysis method, they are boundedly rational rather than completely irrational. \nImplications/Originality/Value: The fundamental analysis does not fully mediate three determinants of irrationality, namely anchoring, control, and overconfidence. Individual investors and brokers are concerned about reducing the impact of these three biases in order to achieve optimal performance. Brokerage firms and fund managers are recommended to consider the behavioral aspects of investors to predict the future because behavioral factors of investors can not only shape the investment trend of individuals but also the market at large.","PeriodicalId":52706,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v7i4.2103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Market bubbles and crashes remain unexplainable by classical finance theories. Because the history of the Pakistan Stock Exchange has been marked by occasional market bubbles and crashes, a behavioral study is conducted to investigate the impact of investor’s behavioral biases on investment performance. Design/Methodology/Approach: Our research investigates behavioral biases and examines the role of such biases in the selection of investment decision methods. We then investigate the direct impact of behavioral biases on investors' investment performance, as well as how investment analysis methods play a role in mediating the impact of behavioral biases on investment performance. We identified 11 irrational behavior biases based on existing literature and in-depth interviews with brokers, and two decision analysis methods are used: fundamental and technical. Findings: Our findings show that PSX investors exhibit moderately high levels of irrational behavior. Despite their moderately high level of irrationality, investors can use fundamental analysis to make better decisions and achieve better results. Since they use fundamental analysis method, they are boundedly rational rather than completely irrational. Implications/Originality/Value: The fundamental analysis does not fully mediate three determinants of irrationality, namely anchoring, control, and overconfidence. Individual investors and brokers are concerned about reducing the impact of these three biases in order to achieve optimal performance. Brokerage firms and fund managers are recommended to consider the behavioral aspects of investors to predict the future because behavioral factors of investors can not only shape the investment trend of individuals but also the market at large.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为偏差与决策分析方法对PSX个人投资者投资绩效的影响
目的:市场泡沫和崩溃仍然是经典金融理论无法解释的。由于巴基斯坦证券交易所的历史以偶尔的市场泡沫和崩溃为标志,因此进行了一项行为研究,以调查投资者的行为偏差对投资绩效的影响。设计/方法/方法:我们的研究调查了行为偏差,并考察了这种偏差在投资决策方法选择中的作用。研究了行为偏差对投资者投资绩效的直接影响,以及投资分析方法如何在行为偏差对投资绩效的影响中发挥中介作用。基于现有文献和对经纪人的深度访谈,我们确定了11种非理性行为偏差,并使用了两种决策分析方法:基本面和技术面。研究结果:我们的研究结果表明,PSX投资者表现出中等水平的非理性行为。尽管投资者的非理性程度较高,但他们可以利用基本面分析做出更好的决策,获得更好的结果。由于他们使用的是基本分析方法,所以他们是有限理性的,而不是完全非理性的。影响/原创性/价值:基本分析并没有完全调解非理性的三个决定因素,即锚定、控制和过度自信。个人投资者和经纪人关心的是减少这三种偏差的影响,以实现最优绩效。建议经纪公司和基金经理考虑投资者的行为方面来预测未来,因为投资者的行为因素不仅可以塑造个人的投资趋势,还可以塑造整个市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impression Management during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis of the Chairperson’s Statement by JSE-Listed Profitable and Least Profitable Companies Customs Valuation Challenges in Multinational Enterprises’ Controlled Transactions: An African Perspective Shareholder Rights and Performance of Deposit Taking SACCO’s Compliance Level with Ifrs 7 by Deposit Money Banks: Whither Nigeria Takaful Operators and Socio-economic Objectives during the Pandemic of Covid-19: Issues and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1