Superficial radiation therapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A review

Haowei Han, Anita Gade, Francesca M. Ceci, Alec Lawson, Sloane Auerbach, Mark S. Nestor
{"title":"Superficial radiation therapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer: A review","authors":"Haowei Han,&nbsp;Anita Gade,&nbsp;Francesca M. Ceci,&nbsp;Alec Lawson,&nbsp;Sloane Auerbach,&nbsp;Mark S. Nestor","doi":"10.1002/der2.174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The high prevalence of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has become a global health-care burden. Various modalities have been established to treat NMSC, with surgery being the mainstay approach. Superficial radiation therapy (SRT) has been in use for over a century to treat various conditions. Recent discussion among the dermatological community has promoted the use of SRT for the treatment of NMSC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A literature search was conducted using electronic databases (Medline, Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, EBSCO) and textbooks, in addition to the authors' clinical experience with SRT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple retrospective medical record reviews have deemed SRT to be highly effective and associated with minimal side effects. Moreover, SRT yields superior cosmetic results. Over the past decade, SRT has become a mainstay of dermatologist treatment of NMSC due to the new technological advances of the devices. These advances include improved controllability, precision in delivery, additional safety precautions, and have sparked a resurgence in research and clinical evidence on SRT. Most recent data have revealed that the NMSC cure rate is about 93%–100% with excellent 5-year follow-up data. Image-guided SRT using ultrasound guidance may additionally improve cure rates in the future.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SRT has shown to be an effective option for NMSC. It can also be effectively used in the management of keloids. The limitations across most studies encompass localized patient selection and a predominance of retrospective reviews in the literature. Additional research is warranted to further support SRT's efficacy in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100366,"journal":{"name":"Dermatological Reviews","volume":"3 6","pages":"409-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/der2.174","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/der2.174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

The high prevalence of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) has become a global health-care burden. Various modalities have been established to treat NMSC, with surgery being the mainstay approach. Superficial radiation therapy (SRT) has been in use for over a century to treat various conditions. Recent discussion among the dermatological community has promoted the use of SRT for the treatment of NMSC.

Materials and Methods

A literature search was conducted using electronic databases (Medline, Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, EBSCO) and textbooks, in addition to the authors' clinical experience with SRT.

Results

Multiple retrospective medical record reviews have deemed SRT to be highly effective and associated with minimal side effects. Moreover, SRT yields superior cosmetic results. Over the past decade, SRT has become a mainstay of dermatologist treatment of NMSC due to the new technological advances of the devices. These advances include improved controllability, precision in delivery, additional safety precautions, and have sparked a resurgence in research and clinical evidence on SRT. Most recent data have revealed that the NMSC cure rate is about 93%–100% with excellent 5-year follow-up data. Image-guided SRT using ultrasound guidance may additionally improve cure rates in the future.

Conclusion

SRT has shown to be an effective option for NMSC. It can also be effectively used in the management of keloids. The limitations across most studies encompass localized patient selection and a predominance of retrospective reviews in the literature. Additional research is warranted to further support SRT's efficacy in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
浅表放射治疗非黑色素瘤皮肤癌:综述
背景非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)的高患病率已成为全球卫生保健负担。已经建立了多种治疗NMSC的方法,手术是主要的方法。浅表放射治疗(SRT)已经使用了一个多世纪来治疗各种疾病。最近在皮肤学界的讨论促进了SRT治疗NMSC的使用。材料与方法利用电子数据库(Medline, Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, EBSCO)和教科书以及作者的SRT临床经验进行文献检索。结果:多次回顾性医疗记录审查认为SRT非常有效,副作用最小。此外,SRT可以产生更好的美容效果。在过去的十年中,由于设备的新技术进步,SRT已成为皮肤科医生治疗NMSC的支柱。这些进展包括改进的可控性、输送的精确性、额外的安全预防措施,并引发了SRT研究和临床证据的复苏。最近的数据显示,NMSC的治愈率约为93%-100%,5年随访数据良好。超声引导下的图像引导SRT在未来可能会进一步提高治愈率。结论SRT是治疗NMSC的有效方法。它也可以有效地用于治疗瘢痕疙瘩。大多数研究的局限性包括局部患者选择和文献中回顾性综述的优势。需要进一步的研究来进一步支持SRT在临床实践中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to “Complications After Exosome Treatment for Aesthetic Skin Rejuvenation” Steroid Injection Treatment for Nodulocystic Acne: A Literature Review Efficacy of Percutaneous Suture Suspension Biomaterials in Brow Lift: A Systematic Review The Potential of Cyperus rotundus L. As a Natural Hair Removal Agent: A Review of Traditional and Modern Applications Recent Update on Teledermatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1