Comparison of the clinical and radiological pictures in patients with congenital knee dislocation during treatment

{"title":"Comparison of the clinical and radiological pictures in patients with congenital knee dislocation during treatment","authors":"","doi":"10.17816/ptors111181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Congenital knee dislocation is a very rare musculoskeletal disease, and it occurs in approximately 1 per 100,000 live births. Many researchers note that the treatment of congenital knee dislocation should begin with conservative methods, during which various complications arise. \nAIM: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological classifications of congenital knee dislocation and show the results of the treatment of this deformation using a Von Rosen splint and plaster corrections. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 58 patients (34 boys and 24 girls) with congenital knee dislocation (83 knee joints). Congenital knee dislocation with arthrogryposis and other systemic pathologies were not included in the study. Before treatment, all patients were assessed for the severity of congenital knee dislocation according to the Tarek and J. Leveuf system. To evaluate the obtained results, nonparametric statistics were used. To search for differences between groups, the KruskalWallis test and the median test were used. To search for correlations, Spearman coefficients were used. Statistica v10 was used for statistical analysis. \nRESULTS: Clinical and radiological data were compared. In both groups, after conservative treatment, excellent and good results were obtained in nearly 98% and satisfactory in 2%. After conservative therapy, surgical treatment was required in 2 of 37 knee joints with the initial severity of Tarek III deformity. \nCONCLUSIONS: The severity of the deformity according to the Tarek system makes it possible to predict the effectiveness of the conservative treatment of congenital knee dislocation at a statistically significant level.","PeriodicalId":37631,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/ptors111181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congenital knee dislocation is a very rare musculoskeletal disease, and it occurs in approximately 1 per 100,000 live births. Many researchers note that the treatment of congenital knee dislocation should begin with conservative methods, during which various complications arise. AIM: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological classifications of congenital knee dislocation and show the results of the treatment of this deformation using a Von Rosen splint and plaster corrections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 58 patients (34 boys and 24 girls) with congenital knee dislocation (83 knee joints). Congenital knee dislocation with arthrogryposis and other systemic pathologies were not included in the study. Before treatment, all patients were assessed for the severity of congenital knee dislocation according to the Tarek and J. Leveuf system. To evaluate the obtained results, nonparametric statistics were used. To search for differences between groups, the KruskalWallis test and the median test were used. To search for correlations, Spearman coefficients were used. Statistica v10 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Clinical and radiological data were compared. In both groups, after conservative treatment, excellent and good results were obtained in nearly 98% and satisfactory in 2%. After conservative therapy, surgical treatment was required in 2 of 37 knee joints with the initial severity of Tarek III deformity. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of the deformity according to the Tarek system makes it possible to predict the effectiveness of the conservative treatment of congenital knee dislocation at a statistically significant level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天性膝关节脱位治疗过程中临床与影像学表现的比较
背景:先天性膝关节脱位是一种非常罕见的肌肉骨骼疾病,大约每10万活产儿中有1例发生。许多研究人员指出,先天性膝关节脱位的治疗应从保守方法开始,在此过程中会出现各种并发症。目的:本研究旨在比较先天性膝关节脱位的临床和影像学分类,并展示使用Von Rosen夹板和石膏矫正治疗这种变形的结果。材料与方法:本研究纳入58例先天性膝关节脱位患者(83个膝关节),其中男34例,女24例。先天性膝关节脱位合并关节挛缩和其他全身性病变未包括在研究中。治疗前,根据Tarek和J. Leveuf系统评估所有患者先天性膝关节脱位的严重程度。为了评价获得的结果,使用了非参数统计。为了寻找组间差异,我们使用了KruskalWallis检验和中位数检验。为了寻找相关性,我们使用了斯皮尔曼系数。使用Statistica v10进行统计分析。结果:临床与影像学资料比较。两组患者经保守治疗,优良率近98%,满意率2%。保守治疗后,37例初始严重程度为Tarek III型畸形的膝关节中有2例需要手术治疗。结论:根据Tarek系统的畸形严重程度,可以预测先天性膝关节脱位保守治疗的有效性,且具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The target audience of the journal is researches, physicians, orthopedic trauma, burn, and pediatric surgeons, anesthesiologists, pediatricians, neurologists, oral surgeons, and all specialists in related fields of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Pitfalls and complications in the treatment of clubfoot by the Ponseti method: A literature review Dynamics of feet dorsiflexion after percutaneous Achilles lengthening for correction of flat feet in children Musculoskeletal injuries and pain in children involved in sports: A literature review Risk factors for the development of congenital giant nevi in children Comparative analysis of the detection of diseases of the muscular system in minors of Saint Petersburg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1