OP29 A measure to improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns of people with dementia in care homes: development and mixed methods evaluation

C. Ellis-Smith, IJ Higginson, Cj Evans
{"title":"OP29 A measure to improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns of people with dementia in care homes: development and mixed methods evaluation","authors":"C. Ellis-Smith, IJ Higginson, Cj Evans","doi":"10.1136/jech-2018-SSMabstracts.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Detection and management of physical symptoms and psychosocial concerns for people with dementia is essential to reduce suffering. Measures used in routine care can support assessment and change care processes to improve outcomes. We aimed to develop and conduct a feasibility and process evaluation of the mechanisms of action (MOA), acceptability and implementation requirements of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) to improve comprehensive assessment and management of symptoms and concerns of residents with dementia in care homes. Methods A mixed methods interventional design informed by the MRC framework and underpinned by a theoretical model of expected MOA. Study conducted in three care homes involving residents with dementia, family, care staff and health professionals. IPOS-Dem V1 was developed from the validated IPOS through a scoping review of symptoms and concerns common in dementia. Two sequential phases followed. Phase one comprised focus groups/semi-structured interviews and cognitive interviews to evaluate content validity, comprehensibility and acceptability; and refinements to IPOS-Dem made. Phase two employed an embedded mixed methods design to evaluate MOA, feasibility and implementation requirements. Residents received IPOS-Dem as part of routine care for 12 weeks. Qualitative data included focus groups, semi-structured interviews and observations. Quantitative data comprised IPOS-Dem scores. Directed content analysis and descriptive statistics was used for qualitative and quantitative data analysis respectively, analysed separately and then integrated on key areas to inform a final theoretical model. Results Phase one: 26 family, care staff and health professionals participated in focus groups/interviews, and 10 care staff in cognitive interviews. Five additional items were identified as important for content validity. Refinements to improve acceptability and comprehensibility included use of lay terms and item descriptors. Phase two: 32 residents received IPOS-Dem and 18 family, care staff and health professionals participated in focus groups, interviews and observations. Key MOA were improved collaborative assessment resulting in improved detection of symptoms and concerns; comprehensive ‘picture of the person’ which supported systematic record-keeping and monitoring, and facilitated communication between care staff, family, and health professionals. IPOS-Dem was perceived as easy to use and providing value to care, with the proportion of missing data decreasing from 2.1% at baseline to 1.1% at 12 weeks. Conclusion IPOS-Dem is an acceptable and feasible measure to improve comprehensive assessment and management of symptoms and concerns in residents with dementia. A theoretical model of likely MOA and implementation requirements is presented. Further psychometric testing and effectiveness trial is required. Funders Cicely Saunders International, Atlantic Philanthropies. This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London (NIHR CLAHRC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s)and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.","PeriodicalId":15778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","volume":"28 1","pages":"A14–A15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-SSMabstracts.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Detection and management of physical symptoms and psychosocial concerns for people with dementia is essential to reduce suffering. Measures used in routine care can support assessment and change care processes to improve outcomes. We aimed to develop and conduct a feasibility and process evaluation of the mechanisms of action (MOA), acceptability and implementation requirements of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) to improve comprehensive assessment and management of symptoms and concerns of residents with dementia in care homes. Methods A mixed methods interventional design informed by the MRC framework and underpinned by a theoretical model of expected MOA. Study conducted in three care homes involving residents with dementia, family, care staff and health professionals. IPOS-Dem V1 was developed from the validated IPOS through a scoping review of symptoms and concerns common in dementia. Two sequential phases followed. Phase one comprised focus groups/semi-structured interviews and cognitive interviews to evaluate content validity, comprehensibility and acceptability; and refinements to IPOS-Dem made. Phase two employed an embedded mixed methods design to evaluate MOA, feasibility and implementation requirements. Residents received IPOS-Dem as part of routine care for 12 weeks. Qualitative data included focus groups, semi-structured interviews and observations. Quantitative data comprised IPOS-Dem scores. Directed content analysis and descriptive statistics was used for qualitative and quantitative data analysis respectively, analysed separately and then integrated on key areas to inform a final theoretical model. Results Phase one: 26 family, care staff and health professionals participated in focus groups/interviews, and 10 care staff in cognitive interviews. Five additional items were identified as important for content validity. Refinements to improve acceptability and comprehensibility included use of lay terms and item descriptors. Phase two: 32 residents received IPOS-Dem and 18 family, care staff and health professionals participated in focus groups, interviews and observations. Key MOA were improved collaborative assessment resulting in improved detection of symptoms and concerns; comprehensive ‘picture of the person’ which supported systematic record-keeping and monitoring, and facilitated communication between care staff, family, and health professionals. IPOS-Dem was perceived as easy to use and providing value to care, with the proportion of missing data decreasing from 2.1% at baseline to 1.1% at 12 weeks. Conclusion IPOS-Dem is an acceptable and feasible measure to improve comprehensive assessment and management of symptoms and concerns in residents with dementia. A theoretical model of likely MOA and implementation requirements is presented. Further psychometric testing and effectiveness trial is required. Funders Cicely Saunders International, Atlantic Philanthropies. This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London (NIHR CLAHRC South London) at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s)and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OP29 .改进对养老院中痴呆症患者症状和关切的评估和管理的措施:发展和混合方法评估
背景:发现和管理痴呆症患者的身体症状和社会心理问题对于减少痛苦至关重要。在日常护理中使用的措施可以支持评估和改变护理过程,以改善结果。我们的目的是制定和实施痴呆综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS-Dem)的作用机制(MOA)、可接受性和实施要求的可行性和过程评估,以改善对养老院痴呆症患者症状和担忧的综合评估和管理。方法以MRC框架为基础,以预期MOA理论模型为基础,采用混合方法进行干预设计。研究在三家养老院进行,涉及痴呆症患者、家人、护理人员和卫生专业人员。IPOS- dem V1是通过对痴呆症常见症状和关注点的范围审查,从经过验证的IPOS发展而来的。接下来是两个连续的阶段。第一阶段包括焦点小组/半结构化访谈和认知访谈,以评估内容的有效性、可理解性和可接受性;并对ipo - dem进行了改进。第二阶段采用嵌入式混合方法设计来评估MOA、可行性和实施要求。居民接受IPOS-Dem作为常规护理的一部分,为期12周。定性数据包括焦点小组、半结构化访谈和观察。定量数据包括IPOS-Dem分数。直接内容分析和描述性统计分别用于定性和定量数据分析,分别进行分析,然后在关键领域进行整合,以告知最终的理论模型。结果第一阶段:26名家庭、护理人员和卫生专业人员参加焦点小组/访谈,10名护理人员参加认知访谈。另外五个项目被认为对内容效度很重要。改进可接受性和可理解性包括使用外行术语和项目描述符。第二阶段:32名居民接受了IPOS-Dem, 18名家庭、护理人员和保健专业人员参加了焦点小组、访谈和观察。关键的MOA改进了协作评估,从而改进了对症状和关切的发现;全面的“患者照片”,支持系统的记录保存和监测,并促进护理人员、家庭和卫生专业人员之间的沟通。IPOS-Dem被认为易于使用并提供护理价值,数据缺失比例从基线时的2.1%下降到12周时的1.1%。结论IPOS-Dem是一种可接受和可行的措施,可改善老年痴呆患者症状和关注点的综合评估和管理。提出了可能的MOA和实现需求的理论模型。需要进一步的心理测量测试和有效性试验。资助者Cicely Saunders International, Atlantic Philanthropies。这项研究得到了国家卫生研究所(NIHR)南伦敦应用健康研究与护理领导合作组织(NIHR CLAHRC南伦敦)在国王学院医院NHS基金会信托基金的支持。本文中表达的观点是作者的观点,不一定是NHS、NIHR或卫生和社会保障部的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early adulthood socioeconomic trajectories contribute to inequalities in adult diet quality, independent of childhood and adulthood socioeconomic position Education-related inequalities in disability during the last years of life: a full population register-based study Impact of increasing workforce racial diversity on black-white disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality Gender-specific aspects of socialisation and risk of cardiovascular disease among community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study using machine learning algorithms and a conventional method Poverty trajectories and child and mother well-being outcomes in Ireland: findings from an Irish prospective cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1