Heidegger on beauty

Una Popović
{"title":"Heidegger on beauty","authors":"Una Popović","doi":"10.2298/zmsdn2177039p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is about Heidegger?s understanding of beauty, with regard to his specific critique and reevaluation of traditional philosophical aesthetics, known as overcoming of aesthetics. Namely, since the notion of beauty is not the most prominent one in Heidegger?s understanding of aesthetics, my aim in this paper is to point out to its role and function in the project of overcoming of aesthetics and metaphysics, and consequently, in the development of Heidegger?s later philosophy in general. I will focus my analyses on two Heidegger?s lectures dating from 1935-1936, The Origin of the Work of Art and The Introduction to Metaphysics. Both of these, in my view, represent key texts for the analysis of the notion of beauty in Heidegger. Firstly, I will analyze the relationship between beauty and art, and thus show that Heidegger?s approach to beauty implies ontological connotations (with regard to the question of Being), as well as a critique of traditional relationship between beauty and art (art as production of beauty). Secondly, I will stress the relation between beauty, truth and light (shine), and thus indicate Heidegger?s positive approach to the matter. Resulting from these analyses, Heidegger?s notion of beauty is shown as a vital part of his overcoming of aesthetics and metaphysics, but also as a specific aspect of various questions and problems of his later philosophy. Additionally, the results of these analyses can become a starting point for further interpretation of the relationship between beauty and form, and between light (shine) and Being in Heidegger?s philosophy.","PeriodicalId":40081,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","volume":"2014 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2177039p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is about Heidegger?s understanding of beauty, with regard to his specific critique and reevaluation of traditional philosophical aesthetics, known as overcoming of aesthetics. Namely, since the notion of beauty is not the most prominent one in Heidegger?s understanding of aesthetics, my aim in this paper is to point out to its role and function in the project of overcoming of aesthetics and metaphysics, and consequently, in the development of Heidegger?s later philosophy in general. I will focus my analyses on two Heidegger?s lectures dating from 1935-1936, The Origin of the Work of Art and The Introduction to Metaphysics. Both of these, in my view, represent key texts for the analysis of the notion of beauty in Heidegger. Firstly, I will analyze the relationship between beauty and art, and thus show that Heidegger?s approach to beauty implies ontological connotations (with regard to the question of Being), as well as a critique of traditional relationship between beauty and art (art as production of beauty). Secondly, I will stress the relation between beauty, truth and light (shine), and thus indicate Heidegger?s positive approach to the matter. Resulting from these analyses, Heidegger?s notion of beauty is shown as a vital part of his overcoming of aesthetics and metaphysics, but also as a specific aspect of various questions and problems of his later philosophy. Additionally, the results of these analyses can become a starting point for further interpretation of the relationship between beauty and form, and between light (shine) and Being in Heidegger?s philosophy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海德格尔论美
这篇论文是关于海德格尔的吗?他对传统哲学美学的具体批判和重新评价,被称为“美学的克服”。也就是说,既然美的概念不是海德格尔最突出的概念?在本文中,我的目的是指出它在克服美学和形而上学的计划中的作用和功能,从而在海德格尔的哲学思想的发展中。他后来的哲学。我将集中分析两个海德格尔?他在1935年至1936年间的讲座《艺术作品的起源》和《形而上学导论》。在我看来,这两者都代表了分析海德格尔的美概念的关键文本。首先,我将分析美与艺术的关系,从而表明海德格尔?他对美的态度包含了本体论的内涵(关于存在的问题),以及对传统的美与艺术之间关系(艺术作为美的产物)的批判。其次,我将强调美、真与光(shine)之间的关系,从而表明海德格尔?他对这件事采取了积极的态度。通过这些分析,海德格尔?他的美学观是他克服美学和形而上学的重要组成部分,也是他后来哲学中各种问题和问题的一个具体方面。此外,这些分析的结果可以成为进一步解释海德格尔作品中美与形式、光与存在之间关系的起点。年代的哲学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Bank performance analysis and identification of key determinants of electronic banking customer satisfaction - balanced scorecard approach Competition among interest group - mechanism and consequences The selection of topics in good practice of teaching the holocaust in England and Republica Srpska: A case study Development, state and perspectives of urban geography with special review of Serbia Ideal fundaments of the history of education as teaching disciplines in Serbia in the 19th century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1