3 Detection and Phenotypic Characterization of Adult Neurogenesis

H. Kuhn, D. Peterson
{"title":"3 Detection and Phenotypic Characterization of Adult Neurogenesis","authors":"H. Kuhn, D. Peterson","doi":"10.1101/087969784.52.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in our understanding of the extent and regulation of adult neurogenesis have been dependent on continued improvements in the detection and quantification of critical events in neurogenesis. To date, no specific and exclusive stem cell marker has been described that would allow for prospective studies of neurogenesis. As a result, detection of neurogenic events has depended on a combination of labeling approaches that document the two critical events in neurogenesis: the generation of new cells and their subsequent progression through lineage commitment to a mature neuron. Detection of neurogenesis in vivo requires the ability to image at a cellular resolution. Although advances in noninvasive imaging approaches, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), show promise for longitudinal studies of neurogenesis, the lack of suitable resolution to characterize individual cells limits the information that can be obtained. In vivo microscopy, using deeply penetrating UV illumination with mulitphoton microscopy or by the recently available endoscopic confocal microscopy, may provide new opportunities for longitudinal studies of neurogenesis in the living animal with single-cell resolution. These latter microscopy approaches are particularly compelling when coupled with transgenic mice expressing phenotype-specific fluorescent reporter genes. However, at present, the predominant approach for studies of neurogenesis relies on traditional histological methods of fixation, production of tissue sections, staining, and microscopic analysis. This chapter discusses methodological considerations for in vivo detection of neurogenesis in the adult brain according to our current state of knowledge. First, detection of newly generated cells is evaluated and the strengths of using exogenous or...","PeriodicalId":10493,"journal":{"name":"Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive","volume":"41 1","pages":"25-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold Spring Harbor Monograph Archive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/087969784.52.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Advances in our understanding of the extent and regulation of adult neurogenesis have been dependent on continued improvements in the detection and quantification of critical events in neurogenesis. To date, no specific and exclusive stem cell marker has been described that would allow for prospective studies of neurogenesis. As a result, detection of neurogenic events has depended on a combination of labeling approaches that document the two critical events in neurogenesis: the generation of new cells and their subsequent progression through lineage commitment to a mature neuron. Detection of neurogenesis in vivo requires the ability to image at a cellular resolution. Although advances in noninvasive imaging approaches, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), show promise for longitudinal studies of neurogenesis, the lack of suitable resolution to characterize individual cells limits the information that can be obtained. In vivo microscopy, using deeply penetrating UV illumination with mulitphoton microscopy or by the recently available endoscopic confocal microscopy, may provide new opportunities for longitudinal studies of neurogenesis in the living animal with single-cell resolution. These latter microscopy approaches are particularly compelling when coupled with transgenic mice expressing phenotype-specific fluorescent reporter genes. However, at present, the predominant approach for studies of neurogenesis relies on traditional histological methods of fixation, production of tissue sections, staining, and microscopic analysis. This chapter discusses methodological considerations for in vivo detection of neurogenesis in the adult brain according to our current state of knowledge. First, detection of newly generated cells is evaluated and the strengths of using exogenous or...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3成人神经发生的检测和表型特征
我们对成人神经发生的程度和调控的理解的进步依赖于神经发生中关键事件的检测和量化的持续改进。到目前为止,还没有特异性和排他性的干细胞标记物被描述,这将允许神经发生的前瞻性研究。因此,神经发生事件的检测依赖于记录神经发生中两个关键事件的标记方法的组合:新细胞的产生和它们通过谱系承诺到成熟神经元的后续进展。体内神经发生的检测需要细胞分辨率成像的能力。尽管磁共振成像(MRI)等非侵入性成像方法的进步为神经发生的纵向研究带来了希望,但缺乏表征单个细胞的合适分辨率限制了可以获得的信息。在活体显微镜下,使用多光子显微镜或最近可用的内窥镜共聚焦显微镜进行深穿透紫外线照射,可能为单细胞分辨率的活体动物神经发生纵向研究提供新的机会。当与表达表型特异性荧光报告基因的转基因小鼠结合时,这些后一种显微镜方法尤其引人注目。然而,目前,研究神经发生的主要方法依赖于传统的固定、组织切片制作、染色和显微镜分析的组织学方法。根据我们目前的知识,本章讨论了成人大脑中神经发生的体内检测的方法学考虑。首先,对新生成细胞的检测进行了评估,并分析了使用外源或…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adult Neurogenesis in Teleost Fish 3 Processing of Yeast Cytoplasmic and Mitochondrial Precusor tRNAs 1 Evolutionary Origin of Bone and Cartilage in Vertebrates 3 Patterning and Differentiation of the Vertebrate Spine Preface/Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1