Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Real-Time Prediction of Equivalent Circulating Density

Vishnu Roy, Anurag Pandey, Anika Saxena, Shivanjali Sharma
{"title":"Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Real-Time Prediction of Equivalent Circulating Density","authors":"Vishnu Roy, Anurag Pandey, Anika Saxena, Shivanjali Sharma","doi":"10.4043/31523-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The equivalent circulating density (ECD) is crucial in avoiding fluid losses or kicks while drilling. It's more critical in wells where the pore pressure gradient is close to the fracture pressure gradient. The conservation of mass and momentum determine the ECD, but this method does not account for other factors like torque, rotating speed, weight on bit, etc. These may affect the ECD directly or indirectly. The aim of this study is a practicality to predict the ECD using various machine learning techniques and to determine their effectiveness.\n The complete drilling dataset of an oil well from Texas was acquired. Over 16000 data points were obtained after the removal of the null values. The data was prepared by scaling it and conducting principal component analysis (PCA). PCA reduced the dimensionality of the dataset while retaining the information. Following this, five different machine learning regression techniques were used to predict the equivalent circulation density, namely, XGBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Elastic net regression. The performance of these techniques was judged by comparing their R2 scores, mean squared errors (MSE), and root mean squared errors (RMSE).\n The results showed that ECD prediction through all the above machine learning techniques is a vital reality. Random forest regression emerged superior from the different methods used, illustrating the highest R2 score and the lowest MSE and RMSE. Its R2 for our model was 0.992, which is an excellent fit. It was followed by SVM, which had the second-lowest RMSE and an R2 of 0.987, close to the random forest technique. Elastic Net, Decision tree, and XG Boost in the respective order were at the bottom of the pool.\n Machine learning is a powerful tool at our disposal to effectively predict quantities in real-time that directly or indirectly depend on several parameters. It can even be effective when no direct correlation between the quantities is known. Thus, machine learning can significantly enhance our ability to optimize drilling operations by having quicker and more accurate predictions. The work shown in this study, if implemented, can provide the crew more time to respond to situations such as the occurrence of kicks and thus will lead to safer operations.","PeriodicalId":11217,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","volume":"139 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31523-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The equivalent circulating density (ECD) is crucial in avoiding fluid losses or kicks while drilling. It's more critical in wells where the pore pressure gradient is close to the fracture pressure gradient. The conservation of mass and momentum determine the ECD, but this method does not account for other factors like torque, rotating speed, weight on bit, etc. These may affect the ECD directly or indirectly. The aim of this study is a practicality to predict the ECD using various machine learning techniques and to determine their effectiveness. The complete drilling dataset of an oil well from Texas was acquired. Over 16000 data points were obtained after the removal of the null values. The data was prepared by scaling it and conducting principal component analysis (PCA). PCA reduced the dimensionality of the dataset while retaining the information. Following this, five different machine learning regression techniques were used to predict the equivalent circulation density, namely, XGBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Elastic net regression. The performance of these techniques was judged by comparing their R2 scores, mean squared errors (MSE), and root mean squared errors (RMSE). The results showed that ECD prediction through all the above machine learning techniques is a vital reality. Random forest regression emerged superior from the different methods used, illustrating the highest R2 score and the lowest MSE and RMSE. Its R2 for our model was 0.992, which is an excellent fit. It was followed by SVM, which had the second-lowest RMSE and an R2 of 0.987, close to the random forest technique. Elastic Net, Decision tree, and XG Boost in the respective order were at the bottom of the pool. Machine learning is a powerful tool at our disposal to effectively predict quantities in real-time that directly or indirectly depend on several parameters. It can even be effective when no direct correlation between the quantities is known. Thus, machine learning can significantly enhance our ability to optimize drilling operations by having quicker and more accurate predictions. The work shown in this study, if implemented, can provide the crew more time to respond to situations such as the occurrence of kicks and thus will lead to safer operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时预测等效循环密度的机器学习技术评估
当量循环密度(ECD)对于避免钻井液漏失或井涌至关重要。在孔隙压力梯度接近破裂压力梯度的井中,这一点更为关键。质量和动量守恒决定了ECD,但该方法没有考虑扭矩、转速、钻头重量等其他因素。这些都可能直接或间接地影响ECD。本研究的目的是使用各种机器学习技术预测ECD并确定其有效性的实用性。获得了德克萨斯州一口油井的完整钻井数据集。去除空值后,获得了超过16000个数据点。通过缩放数据并进行主成分分析(PCA)来准备数据。PCA在保留信息的同时降低了数据集的维数。在此基础上,采用XGBoost、Random Forest、Support Vector machine、Decision Tree和Elastic net五种不同的机器学习回归技术预测等效循环密度。通过比较R2评分、均方误差(MSE)和均方根误差(RMSE)来判断这些技术的性能。结果表明,通过上述所有机器学习技术进行ECD预测是至关重要的现实。随机森林回归从使用的不同方法中表现出优越性,表明R2得分最高,MSE和RMSE最低。我们的模型的R2为0.992,这是一个很好的拟合。其次是SVM,其RMSE第二低,R2为0.987,接近随机森林技术。Elastic Net、Decision tree和XG Boost按各自的顺序排在最后。机器学习是一个强大的工具,我们可以使用它来有效地实时预测直接或间接依赖于几个参数的数量。它甚至在数量之间没有直接关联的情况下也是有效的。因此,通过更快、更准确的预测,机器学习可以显著提高我们优化钻井作业的能力。本研究中所展示的工作,如果得到实施,可以为工作人员提供更多的时间来应对诸如发生踢脚等情况,从而提高作业的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Effective Framework of Integrated Development of Offshore Marginal Oilfields - Case Study of a Heavy Oil Reservoir with Thin Layers An Experimental Investigation into the Potential of a Green Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer Formulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Sandstone Reservoir World's First Arsenic in Condensate Removal for Oil & Gas Industry and its Universal Applications for Adsorption Facilities Digital Well Construction with Mud Motor Applications Coreflooding Experiments on PAM/PEI Polymer Gel for Water Control in High-Temperature and High-Pressure Conditions: With and Without Crossflow Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1