Enterprise Risk Management – Approaches Determining Its Application and Relation to Business Performance

J. Klučka, Rudolf Grünbichler
{"title":"Enterprise Risk Management – Approaches Determining Its Application and Relation to Business Performance","authors":"J. Klučka, Rudolf Grünbichler","doi":"10.12776/qip.v24i2.1467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: As management systems, enterprise risk management and enterprise performance management pursue similar objectives and influence each other positively. The paper aims to provide an insight into the relationship between Enterprise Risk Management and Business Performance Management. Methodology/Approach: The paper compares the results of an American study with the results of a Slovakian study. First, the American results are cited and interpreted. Then the Slovak results are presented and discussed. Then the results are compared. In the last part an overall conclusion is drawn, the relationships between the results are shown and practical implications are explained. Findings: The results show similarities, but also differences to Enterprise Risk Management and the relationships between Enterprise Risk Management and Business Performance Management. The paper shows that there are differences in both the management approach and the impact on business performance between American and Slovak companies. Research Limitation/implication: A limitation in both studies is the limited number of participating companies. This is accompanied by a higher probability of error. Originality/Value of paper: The paper provides new information to the gap related to subjects enterprise risk management and business performance management and their relations.","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"16 1","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/qip.v24i2.1467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Purpose: As management systems, enterprise risk management and enterprise performance management pursue similar objectives and influence each other positively. The paper aims to provide an insight into the relationship between Enterprise Risk Management and Business Performance Management. Methodology/Approach: The paper compares the results of an American study with the results of a Slovakian study. First, the American results are cited and interpreted. Then the Slovak results are presented and discussed. Then the results are compared. In the last part an overall conclusion is drawn, the relationships between the results are shown and practical implications are explained. Findings: The results show similarities, but also differences to Enterprise Risk Management and the relationships between Enterprise Risk Management and Business Performance Management. The paper shows that there are differences in both the management approach and the impact on business performance between American and Slovak companies. Research Limitation/implication: A limitation in both studies is the limited number of participating companies. This is accompanied by a higher probability of error. Originality/Value of paper: The paper provides new information to the gap related to subjects enterprise risk management and business performance management and their relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业风险管理-确定其应用及其与经营绩效关系的方法
目的:企业风险管理与企业绩效管理作为一种管理制度,追求相似的目标,并相互积极影响。本文旨在深入探讨企业风险管理与企业绩效管理之间的关系。方法/方法:本文将一项美国研究的结果与一项斯洛伐克研究的结果进行比较。首先,美国的结果被引用和解释。然后介绍和讨论了斯洛伐克的结果。然后对结果进行比较。最后,对研究结果进行了总结,并对研究结果之间的关系进行了说明。研究发现:研究结果与企业风险管理、企业风险管理与企业绩效管理的关系既有相似之处,也有差异。本文表明,美国和斯洛伐克公司在管理方式和对经营绩效的影响方面存在差异。研究限制/启示:这两项研究的一个限制是参与公司的数量有限。这伴随着更高的出错概率。论文的独创性/价值:本文对企业风险管理与企业绩效管理及其关系的相关主题的差距提供了新的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benchmarking of the e-Learning Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training: Project Results Mapping the Accidents and Unsafe Conditions of Workers in the Automotive Sector Developing a Systematic and Practical Road Map for Implementing Quality 4.0 Quality 4.0 in Digital Manufacturing – Example of Good Practice Comparative Analysis of Innovation Districts to Set Up Performance Goals for Tec Innovation District
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1