Encountering an alien world of disease and treatment. A qualitative study on oesophageal cancer patients’ experiences before start of treatment and the process of participation in treatment decisions

M. Larsen
{"title":"Encountering an alien world of disease and treatment. A qualitative study on oesophageal cancer patients’ experiences before start of treatment and the process of participation in treatment decisions","authors":"M. Larsen","doi":"10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The study explored oesophageal cancer (EC) patients’ experiences before the start of treatment and the process of participation in treatment decisions. Background: EC is a serious and potentially lethal disease. Surgery and perioperative chemotherapy is the established treatment, which results in a treatment course of 6 to 8 months. No studies have explored how patients with EC experience the diagnosis, the time before the diagnosis and start of treatment and how they experience participating in treatment decisions. Design: The study was a qualitative study employing a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach. Methods: Sixteen patients with EC participated. Data collection was carried out using participant observations and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed with inspiration from Ricœur’s theory of interpretation. Results: The study showed that patients struggle to gain control of the new life situation and alternate between doubt and hope for the future. Maintaining everyday life activities is of importance and helps the patients deal with the diagnosis and forthcoming treatment. Patients acknowledged that the experts made decisions, yet they were aware that experts assessed their capability to access treatment. Patients experienced the time from diagnosis to the start of treatment as being in ‘no man’s land’. Conclusions: EC patients encountered an alien world of disease and treatment and are struggling to gain control of their new life situation. Health professionals tend not to focus on patient expressions of everyday life and patients are not actively invited to participate in decisions.","PeriodicalId":72966,"journal":{"name":"European journal for person centered healthcare","volume":"14 1","pages":"518-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for person centered healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: The study explored oesophageal cancer (EC) patients’ experiences before the start of treatment and the process of participation in treatment decisions. Background: EC is a serious and potentially lethal disease. Surgery and perioperative chemotherapy is the established treatment, which results in a treatment course of 6 to 8 months. No studies have explored how patients with EC experience the diagnosis, the time before the diagnosis and start of treatment and how they experience participating in treatment decisions. Design: The study was a qualitative study employing a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach. Methods: Sixteen patients with EC participated. Data collection was carried out using participant observations and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed with inspiration from Ricœur’s theory of interpretation. Results: The study showed that patients struggle to gain control of the new life situation and alternate between doubt and hope for the future. Maintaining everyday life activities is of importance and helps the patients deal with the diagnosis and forthcoming treatment. Patients acknowledged that the experts made decisions, yet they were aware that experts assessed their capability to access treatment. Patients experienced the time from diagnosis to the start of treatment as being in ‘no man’s land’. Conclusions: EC patients encountered an alien world of disease and treatment and are struggling to gain control of their new life situation. Health professionals tend not to focus on patient expressions of everyday life and patients are not actively invited to participate in decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遇到一个疾病和治疗的陌生世界。食管癌患者治疗前经历及参与治疗决策过程的定性研究
目的:探讨食管癌(EC)患者在治疗开始前的经历和参与治疗决策的过程。背景:EC是一种严重且具有潜在致命性的疾病。手术和围手术期化疗是常用的治疗方法,疗程为6 ~ 8个月。没有研究探讨EC患者如何经历诊断,诊断和开始治疗前的时间以及他们如何参与治疗决策。设计:本研究采用现象学-解释学方法进行定性研究。方法:16例EC患者参与。数据收集采用参与者观察和半结构化访谈。数据分析受到Ricœur解释理论的启发。结果:研究表明,患者难以控制新的生活状况,在对未来的怀疑和希望之间徘徊。维持日常生活活动很重要,并有助于患者应对诊断和即将到来的治疗。患者承认专家做了决定,但他们也知道专家评估了他们获得治疗的能力。患者从诊断到开始治疗的这段时间都处于“无人区”。结论:EC患者遇到了一个陌生的疾病和治疗世界,他们正在努力控制自己的新生活状况。卫生专业人员往往不关注患者的日常生活表达,也不积极邀请患者参与决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ethical and epistemic roles of narrative in person-centred healthcare Person-Centred Healthcare versus Patient Centricity - what is the difference and how are pharmaceutical companies aiming to secure internal representation of the patient voice? Moving past phronesis: clinical reasoning in person-centered care Persons over models: shared decision-making for person-centered medicine lifestyle and degeneracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1