Guided Inquiry Learning: How to Improve Students' Argumentation Abilities in Science Learning?

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Special Education Technology Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.23887/jet.v7i2.63193
Della Novri Yanti, J. Ikhsan, A. Wiyarsi
{"title":"Guided Inquiry Learning: How to Improve Students' Argumentation Abilities in Science Learning?","authors":"Della Novri Yanti, J. Ikhsan, A. Wiyarsi","doi":"10.23887/jet.v7i2.63193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A big challenge for educators in carrying out learning that has undergone drastic changes. During the pandemic, learning activities carried out online were again carried out offline. This learning adaptation has a considerable impact on learning outcomes. Students have difficulty understanding chemical concepts and are passive in giving opinions in learning so it is difficult to integrate knowledge. During online learning activities, student learning resources are still focused on abstract concepts and books provided. The purpose of this study was to improve students' argumentation skills on chemistry in interpreting the knowledge obtained with the guided inquiry learning model. This type of research is a descriptive research with a quantitative approach. Data collection techniques used observation, argumentation ability tests, and documentation. The data obtained were analyzed using quantitative analysis techniques. Based on the results of the study, it showed that students were able to make claims but had difficulty presenting data and proving evidence. Students' initial argumentation abilities can be a reference for educators to determine future learning activities, with the hope that learning is designed not only to focus on achieving conceptual understanding but to develop students' argumentation abilities.","PeriodicalId":46468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Special Education Technology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Special Education Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i2.63193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A big challenge for educators in carrying out learning that has undergone drastic changes. During the pandemic, learning activities carried out online were again carried out offline. This learning adaptation has a considerable impact on learning outcomes. Students have difficulty understanding chemical concepts and are passive in giving opinions in learning so it is difficult to integrate knowledge. During online learning activities, student learning resources are still focused on abstract concepts and books provided. The purpose of this study was to improve students' argumentation skills on chemistry in interpreting the knowledge obtained with the guided inquiry learning model. This type of research is a descriptive research with a quantitative approach. Data collection techniques used observation, argumentation ability tests, and documentation. The data obtained were analyzed using quantitative analysis techniques. Based on the results of the study, it showed that students were able to make claims but had difficulty presenting data and proving evidence. Students' initial argumentation abilities can be a reference for educators to determine future learning activities, with the hope that learning is designed not only to focus on achieving conceptual understanding but to develop students' argumentation abilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导探究学习:科学学习中如何提高学生的论证能力?
教育工作者面临的一个巨大挑战是如何开展经历了巨大变化的学习。大流行期间,在线开展的学习活动再次在线下开展。这种学习适应对学习结果有相当大的影响。学生对化学概念的理解有困难,在学习中被动发表意见,难以整合知识。在在线学习活动中,学生的学习资源仍然集中在抽象的概念和提供的书籍上。本研究的目的是提高学生在解释探究性学习模式下所获得的化学知识时的论证能力。这类研究是一种定量方法的描述性研究。数据收集技术使用观察、论证能力测试和文档。采用定量分析技术对所得数据进行分析。根据这项研究的结果,它表明学生们能够提出主张,但在提出数据和证明证据方面存在困难。学生最初的论证能力可以作为教育者确定未来学习活动的参考,希望学习不仅仅是为了实现概念理解,而是为了培养学生的论证能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Technology Integration Among Special Education Certified Co-Teachers in the Inclusion Classroom Assistive Technology Use Among Students with Visual Impairments in Academic Classes Effects of Assistive Technology Instruction on Pre-Service Teachers: A Systematic Review Demystifying Tele-Counseling: Meeting Student Needs Through Ethical Decision-Making and Collaborative Consultation An Evaluation of Online Training on Pre-service Special Education Teachers’ Case Application of Visual Schedules for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disability in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1