Comparison of different control methods in switched reluctance drive system

Qingqing Yang, Mingyao Ma, Zhongyi Chang, Yue Fa, Zhemin Lin
{"title":"Comparison of different control methods in switched reluctance drive system","authors":"Qingqing Yang, Mingyao Ma, Zhongyi Chang, Yue Fa, Zhemin Lin","doi":"10.1109/IPEMC.2016.7512392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparison of different torque control methods is presented in this paper, including current chopping control (CCC), torque sharing function (TSF) control and direct instantaneous torque control (DITC). These control methods play different roles in reducing torque ripples, increasing total output torque and getting maximum efficiency in different speed range.For example, DITC can reduce torque ripples at low speed obviously while it does not work out at high speed. TSF can reduce torque ripples efficiently at high speed but, in the meantime, it leads to total output torque decrease. CCC can output higher torque compared with previous two control methods, however its torque ripples is higher at high speed . In this paper, these three control methods are introduced and their performances are compared in terms of torque ripples and maximum output torque in order to further understand their inherent characteristics. Torque ripple-speed performance and the maximum output torque-speed performance of these control methods are obtained based on simulation results. Theoretical comparison and analysis brings us the guideline of how to select optimal control methods of SR drive system in different speed range for getting better output performance.","PeriodicalId":6857,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC-ECCE Asia)","volume":"38 1","pages":"827-831"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC-ECCE Asia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPEMC.2016.7512392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Comparison of different torque control methods is presented in this paper, including current chopping control (CCC), torque sharing function (TSF) control and direct instantaneous torque control (DITC). These control methods play different roles in reducing torque ripples, increasing total output torque and getting maximum efficiency in different speed range.For example, DITC can reduce torque ripples at low speed obviously while it does not work out at high speed. TSF can reduce torque ripples efficiently at high speed but, in the meantime, it leads to total output torque decrease. CCC can output higher torque compared with previous two control methods, however its torque ripples is higher at high speed . In this paper, these three control methods are introduced and their performances are compared in terms of torque ripples and maximum output torque in order to further understand their inherent characteristics. Torque ripple-speed performance and the maximum output torque-speed performance of these control methods are obtained based on simulation results. Theoretical comparison and analysis brings us the guideline of how to select optimal control methods of SR drive system in different speed range for getting better output performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开关磁阻驱动系统中不同控制方法的比较
对斩波电流控制(CCC)、转矩共享函数控制(TSF)和直接瞬时转矩控制(DITC)三种转矩控制方法进行了比较。这些控制方法在减小转矩波动、提高总输出转矩和在不同转速范围内获得最大效率方面发挥着不同的作用。例如,DITC在低速时可以明显地减小转矩波动,而在高速时则没有效果。TSF可以有效地抑制高速转矩波动,但同时也会导致总输出转矩下降。与前两种控制方法相比,连续变矩控制可以输出更高的转矩,但在高速时转矩波动较大。本文介绍了这三种控制方法,并从转矩脉动和最大输出转矩两方面对其性能进行了比较,进一步了解了它们的固有特性。根据仿真结果,得到了各控制方法的转矩脉动转速性能和最大输出转矩转速性能。理论比较和分析为在不同转速范围内选择最优的SR驱动系统控制方法以获得更好的输出性能提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart Transformer reliability and efficiency through modularity Passive regenerative snubber cell applied to isolated DCM SEPIC converter Optimal power scheduling for an islanded hybrid microgrid Analysis of power losses in power MOSFET based stacked polyphase bridges converters Performance evaluation of a non-isolated bidirectional three-port power converter for energy storage applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1