Yield response of African leafy vegetables to combined manure and urea microdosing in West Africa

André Adjogboto, Dagnon Didier Likpètè, C. Sossa-Vihotogbe, P. Akponikpè, A. Djènontin, M. Baco, R. Diogo, K. E. Agbossou
{"title":"Yield response of African leafy vegetables to combined manure and urea microdosing in West Africa","authors":"André Adjogboto, Dagnon Didier Likpètè, C. Sossa-Vihotogbe, P. Akponikpè, A. Djènontin, M. Baco, R. Diogo, K. E. Agbossou","doi":"10.25518/1780-4507.20248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Description of the subject. Fertilizers microdosing was tested for African leafy vegetables (ALVs) production to reduce the high rates of fertilizers usually applied to their production in West Africa. Objectives. This study aims to (i) evaluate the response of three ALVs (Amaranthus cruentus L., Solanum macrocarpon L. and Ocimum gratissimum L.) to cattle manure combined with urea-N microdosing and application timing and (ii) assess their partial factor productivity. Method. On-station trials were carried out over three growing seasons (2015 to 2017) in Northern Benin. Urea-N rates of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 60 kg urea-N·ha-1 combined with 5 t·ha-1 of cattle manure (M5N0, M5N10, M5N20, M5N30, M5N40 and M5N60, respectively) and sole application as control (40 (M0N40) and 80 kg urea-N·ha-1 (M0N80)) and two urea-N application timings (T1 = 0 and T2 = 14 days after transplanting) were tested in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Results. The M5N60 treatment resulted in the highest A. cruentus fresh yield and improved leaf yield by 90 and 151% compared to M5N0, and the average of the two no-manure input treatments M0N40 and M0N80, respectively, while M5N40 treatment improved S. macrocarpon fresh yield the best by 23% compared to M5N0. For O. gratissimum, no significant difference was found between urea-N microdose rates. Besides, urea fertilizer application timing affected neither fresh yields nor partial factor productivity for any studied ALVs species. Conclusions. Reduced combination of urea-N and cattle manure is a promising nutrient management practice for ALVs production in West Africa as it improved yields while saving fertilizer for smallholder vegetable farmers.","PeriodicalId":87455,"journal":{"name":"Skull base surgery","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skull base surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.20248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Description of the subject. Fertilizers microdosing was tested for African leafy vegetables (ALVs) production to reduce the high rates of fertilizers usually applied to their production in West Africa. Objectives. This study aims to (i) evaluate the response of three ALVs (Amaranthus cruentus L., Solanum macrocarpon L. and Ocimum gratissimum L.) to cattle manure combined with urea-N microdosing and application timing and (ii) assess their partial factor productivity. Method. On-station trials were carried out over three growing seasons (2015 to 2017) in Northern Benin. Urea-N rates of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 60 kg urea-N·ha-1 combined with 5 t·ha-1 of cattle manure (M5N0, M5N10, M5N20, M5N30, M5N40 and M5N60, respectively) and sole application as control (40 (M0N40) and 80 kg urea-N·ha-1 (M0N80)) and two urea-N application timings (T1 = 0 and T2 = 14 days after transplanting) were tested in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Results. The M5N60 treatment resulted in the highest A. cruentus fresh yield and improved leaf yield by 90 and 151% compared to M5N0, and the average of the two no-manure input treatments M0N40 and M0N80, respectively, while M5N40 treatment improved S. macrocarpon fresh yield the best by 23% compared to M5N0. For O. gratissimum, no significant difference was found between urea-N microdose rates. Besides, urea fertilizer application timing affected neither fresh yields nor partial factor productivity for any studied ALVs species. Conclusions. Reduced combination of urea-N and cattle manure is a promising nutrient management practice for ALVs production in West Africa as it improved yields while saving fertilizer for smallholder vegetable farmers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西非非洲叶菜对有机肥和尿素配施的产量响应
主题描述。对非洲叶菜(ALVs)生产进行了肥料微剂量试验,以降低西非叶菜生产中通常施用的高肥料率。目标。本研究旨在(i)评价三种ALVs (Amaranthus cruentus L., Solanum macrocarpon L.和Ocimum gratissimum L.)对牛粪尿素氮微投加和施用时间的响应,(ii)评估它们的部分要素生产率。方法。在贝宁北部的三个生长季节(2015年至2017年)进行了现场试验。采用随机完全区组设计,采用4个重复,分别以0、10、20、30、40和60 kg尿素- n·ha-1配5 t·ha-1牛粪(M5N0、M5N10、M5N20、M5N30、M5N40和M5N60)和单独施肥(40 (M0N40)和80 kg尿素- n·ha-1 (M0N80))为对照,2个施肥时间(移栽后T1 = 0和T2 = 14 d)进行试验。结果。与M5N0相比,M5N60处理的毛蚶鲜产量最高,叶片产量提高了90%和151%,是M0N40和M0N80处理的平均值,而M5N40处理对毛蚶鲜产量的提高效果最好,比M5N0提高了23%。对于灰孢弧菌,尿素-氮微剂量率之间无显著差异。此外,尿素施肥期对所有ALVs品种的新鲜产量和部分要素生产率均无影响。结论。在西非,减少尿素氮和牛粪的组合施用是一种很有前途的营养物管理方法,因为它提高了产量,同时为小农菜农节省了肥料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Caractérisation des acteurs de l’agroforesterie pour une co-conception de plateformes d’innovation suivant le transect Koumbia Guéguéré Dano au Burkina Faso Impact of contrasted bioavailable silicon inputs in a hydroponic system on the development of maize plants (Zea mays L.) Technology of a novel conidia-tablet formulation and packaging type to increase Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Ophiocordycipitaceae) shelf life at room temperature Fluctuation des populations et évaluation des dégâts des mouches de fruits (Diptera : Tephritidae) dans les parcs à karité de l’Ouest du Burkina Faso : cas du transect Koumbia-Dano Yield response of African leafy vegetables to combined manure and urea microdosing in West Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1