Estimating complier average causal effects for clustered RCTs when the treatment affects the service population

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Causal Inference Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/jci-2022-0033
Peter Z. Schochet
{"title":"Estimating complier average causal effects for clustered RCTs when the treatment affects the service population","authors":"Peter Z. Schochet","doi":"10.1515/jci-2022-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sometimes test interventions that aim to improve existing services targeted to a subset of individuals identified after randomization. Accordingly, the treatment could affect the composition of service recipients and the offered services. With such bias, intention-to-treat estimates using data on service recipients and nonrecipients may be difficult to interpret. This article develops causal estimands and inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimators for complier populations in these settings, using a generalized estimating equation approach that adjusts the standard errors for estimation error in the IPW weights. While our focus is on more general clustered RCTs, the methods also apply (reduce) to nonclustered RCTs. Simulations show that the estimators achieve nominal confidence interval coverage under the assumed identification conditions. An empirical application demonstrates the methods using data from a large-scale RCT testing the effects of early childhood services on children’s cognitive development scores. An R program for estimation is available for download.","PeriodicalId":48576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Causal Inference","volume":"664 1","pages":"300 - 334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Causal Inference","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2022-0033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sometimes test interventions that aim to improve existing services targeted to a subset of individuals identified after randomization. Accordingly, the treatment could affect the composition of service recipients and the offered services. With such bias, intention-to-treat estimates using data on service recipients and nonrecipients may be difficult to interpret. This article develops causal estimands and inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimators for complier populations in these settings, using a generalized estimating equation approach that adjusts the standard errors for estimation error in the IPW weights. While our focus is on more general clustered RCTs, the methods also apply (reduce) to nonclustered RCTs. Simulations show that the estimators achieve nominal confidence interval coverage under the assumed identification conditions. An empirical application demonstrates the methods using data from a large-scale RCT testing the effects of early childhood services on children’s cognitive development scores. An R program for estimation is available for download.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当治疗影响到服务人群时,估计聚类随机对照试验的编译器平均因果效应
随机对照试验(RCTs)有时会测试旨在改善针对随机化后确定的个体子集的现有服务的干预措施。因此,这种待遇可能影响到服务接受者和所提供服务的构成。由于这种偏差,使用服务接受者和非接受者数据的意向治疗估计可能难以解释。本文使用一种广义估计方程方法来调整IPW权重中估计误差的标准误差,为这些情况下的编译器总体开发因果估计和逆概率加权(IPW)估计器。虽然我们的重点是更一般的聚类随机对照试验,但这些方法也适用于非聚类随机对照试验。仿真结果表明,在假定的识别条件下,估计器达到了名义置信区间覆盖。一项实证应用表明,该方法使用了一项大规模随机对照试验的数据,测试了幼儿服务对儿童认知发展得分的影响。可以下载一个用于估算的R程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Causal Inference
Journal of Causal Inference Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
审稿时长
86 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Causal Inference (JCI) publishes papers on theoretical and applied causal research across the range of academic disciplines that use quantitative tools to study causality.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Boolean relationships in Configurational Comparative Methods Comparison of open-source software for producing directed acyclic graphs. LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND PRESENTATION OF MATERIALS ON ENGLISH TEXTBOOK “WHEN ENGLISH RINGS A BELL” BASED ON BSNP Heterogeneous interventional effects with multiple mediators: Semiparametric and nonparametric approaches Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1