Career Preparedness Survey Outcomes of Food Science Graduates—A Follow-Up Assessment

J. Bohlscheid, Stephanie Clark
{"title":"Career Preparedness Survey Outcomes of Food Science Graduates—A Follow-Up Assessment","authors":"J. Bohlscheid, Stephanie Clark","doi":"10.1111/J.1541-4329.2011.00139.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:  Fifty-eight recent graduates (1998–2008) from the joint Washington State University (WSU) and University of Idaho (UI) BiState School of Food Science program and 27 of their employers participated in a survey assessing learning outcomes based on the 2001 Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) core competencies for undergraduate food science programs. Parallel web-based survey instruments for the graduates and employers using the WSU Skylight Matrix Survey System© were employed to assess the attitudes of the respondents to the frequency of usage of IFT defined skills and the adequacy of the graduates’ preparation from the program. Graduates responded that they were generally satisfied with their education; however, they reported lower rates of adequate or better preparation in Success Skill involving group dynamics, processing and engineering skills, and government regulations. Most of these skills were also the least frequently used by graduates in their careers. Success Skills were the most frequently performed competencies, while food microbiology and safety, and some engineering and processing skills were used less frequently by graduates of the Food Science program. Greater than 80% of the employers reported that the graduates’ performance was adequate or better in all skill areas. The assessment suggested program improvement since a similar survey in 2004, but also illuminated areas for improvement in teaching and learning, particularly in light of the revised IFT 2011 Guidelines. Specifically, graduates and employers emphasized the need for more course work that weaves critical thinking skills, group dynamics, and government regulations into the classroom. Graduates also highlighted the importance of internships and extracurricular activities for career preparation.","PeriodicalId":22784,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Food Science Education","volume":"126 1","pages":"8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Food Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1541-4329.2011.00139.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract:  Fifty-eight recent graduates (1998–2008) from the joint Washington State University (WSU) and University of Idaho (UI) BiState School of Food Science program and 27 of their employers participated in a survey assessing learning outcomes based on the 2001 Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) core competencies for undergraduate food science programs. Parallel web-based survey instruments for the graduates and employers using the WSU Skylight Matrix Survey System© were employed to assess the attitudes of the respondents to the frequency of usage of IFT defined skills and the adequacy of the graduates’ preparation from the program. Graduates responded that they were generally satisfied with their education; however, they reported lower rates of adequate or better preparation in Success Skill involving group dynamics, processing and engineering skills, and government regulations. Most of these skills were also the least frequently used by graduates in their careers. Success Skills were the most frequently performed competencies, while food microbiology and safety, and some engineering and processing skills were used less frequently by graduates of the Food Science program. Greater than 80% of the employers reported that the graduates’ performance was adequate or better in all skill areas. The assessment suggested program improvement since a similar survey in 2004, but also illuminated areas for improvement in teaching and learning, particularly in light of the revised IFT 2011 Guidelines. Specifically, graduates and employers emphasized the need for more course work that weaves critical thinking skills, group dynamics, and government regulations into the classroom. Graduates also highlighted the importance of internships and extracurricular activities for career preparation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食品科学专业毕业生职业准备调查结果-后续评估
摘要:华盛顿州立大学(WSU)和爱达荷州立大学(UI)联合食品科学学院(BiState School of Food Science)的58名应届毕业生(1998-2008)及其27名雇主参与了一项基于2001年食品技术学院(IFT)食品科学本科专业核心竞争力的学习结果评估调查。使用WSU天窗矩阵调查系统©为毕业生和雇主提供平行的基于网络的调查工具,以评估受访者对使用IFT定义的技能的频率和毕业生从该计划中准备的充分性的态度。毕业生回答说,他们总体上对自己的教育感到满意;然而,他们报告说,在涉及团队动力、处理和工程技能以及政府法规的成功技能方面,他们准备充分或更好的比例较低。这些技能中的大多数也是毕业生在职业生涯中使用频率最低的。成功技能是最常使用的能力,而食品微生物学和安全,以及一些工程和加工技能则较少被食品科学专业的毕业生使用。超过80%的雇主报告说,毕业生在所有技能领域的表现都是足够或更好的。自2004年的类似调查以来,评估建议对项目进行改进,但也指出了教学和学习方面需要改进的领域,特别是根据修订后的2011年IFT指南。具体来说,毕业生和雇主强调需要更多的课程,将批判性思维技能、团队动力和政府法规融入课堂。毕业生们还强调了实习和课外活动对职业准备的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Windshields and rearview mirrors Book Review: Don't Make Me Think, Revisited . Using a 3D food printer as a teaching tool: Focus groups with dietitians, teachers, and nutrition students Engaged food science: Connecting K‐8 learners to food science while engaging graduate students in science communication Effects of implementing flipped classroom elements and dynamic in‐class discussion on student performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1