Impact of Proactive Integrated Care on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Patricia B. Koff, Sung‐joon Min, Debora L. P. Diaz, Tammie J. Freitag, Shannon S. James, Norbert F. Voelkel, Derek J. Linderman, F. Diaz del Valle, J. Zakrajsek, Richard K. Albert, Todd M. Bull, A. Beck, T. Stelzner, Debra P. Ritzwoller, C. Kveton, S. Carwin, Moumita Ghosh, Robert L. Keith, John M. Westfall, William Vandivier
{"title":"Impact of Proactive Integrated Care on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"Patricia B. Koff, Sung‐joon Min, Debora L. P. Diaz, Tammie J. Freitag, Shannon S. James, Norbert F. Voelkel, Derek J. Linderman, F. Diaz del Valle, J. Zakrajsek, Richard K. Albert, Todd M. Bull, A. Beck, T. Stelzner, Debra P. Ritzwoller, C. Kveton, S. Carwin, Moumita Ghosh, Robert L. Keith, John M. Westfall, William Vandivier","doi":"10.1101/2020.05.19.20107110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Up to 50% of COPD patients do not receive recommended care for COPD. To address this important issue, we developed Proactive Integrated Care (Proactive iCare), a healthcare delivery model that couples integrated care with remote monitoring. Methods. We conducted a prospective, quasi-randomized clinical trial in 511 patients with advanced COPD, or a recent COPD exacerbation, to test whether Proactive iCare impacts patient- centered outcomes and healthcare utilization. Patients were allocated to Proactive iCare (n =352) or Usual Care (n = 159), and were examined for changes in quality of life using the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), symptoms, guideline-based care, and healthcare utilization. Findings. Proactive iCare improved the total SGRQ by 7-9 units (p<0.0001), symptom SGRQ by 9 units (p<0.0001), activity SGRQ by 6-7 units (p<0.001) and impact SGRQ by 7-11 units (p<0.0001) at 3, 6 and 9 months, compared with Usual Care. Proactive iCare increased the 6-minute walk distance by 40 m (p<0.001), reduced COPD-related urgent office visits by 76 visits per 100 subjects (p<0.0001), identified unreported exacerbations, and decreased smoking (p = 0.01). Proactive iCare also improved cough, sputum, shortness of breath, the BODE index and oxygen titration (p<0.05). Mortality in the Proactive iCare group (1.1%) was not significantly different than mortality in the Usual Care group (3.8%; p = 0.08). Interpretation. Results suggest that linking integrated care with remote monitoring improves the lives of people with advanced COPD.","PeriodicalId":10249,"journal":{"name":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.20107110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background. Up to 50% of COPD patients do not receive recommended care for COPD. To address this important issue, we developed Proactive Integrated Care (Proactive iCare), a healthcare delivery model that couples integrated care with remote monitoring. Methods. We conducted a prospective, quasi-randomized clinical trial in 511 patients with advanced COPD, or a recent COPD exacerbation, to test whether Proactive iCare impacts patient- centered outcomes and healthcare utilization. Patients were allocated to Proactive iCare (n =352) or Usual Care (n = 159), and were examined for changes in quality of life using the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), symptoms, guideline-based care, and healthcare utilization. Findings. Proactive iCare improved the total SGRQ by 7-9 units (p<0.0001), symptom SGRQ by 9 units (p<0.0001), activity SGRQ by 6-7 units (p<0.001) and impact SGRQ by 7-11 units (p<0.0001) at 3, 6 and 9 months, compared with Usual Care. Proactive iCare increased the 6-minute walk distance by 40 m (p<0.001), reduced COPD-related urgent office visits by 76 visits per 100 subjects (p<0.0001), identified unreported exacerbations, and decreased smoking (p = 0.01). Proactive iCare also improved cough, sputum, shortness of breath, the BODE index and oxygen titration (p<0.05). Mortality in the Proactive iCare group (1.1%) was not significantly different than mortality in the Usual Care group (3.8%; p = 0.08). Interpretation. Results suggest that linking integrated care with remote monitoring improves the lives of people with advanced COPD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动综合护理对慢性阻塞性肺疾病的影响
背景。高达50%的COPD患者没有接受推荐的COPD治疗。为了解决这一重要问题,我们开发了主动集成护理(Proactive iCare),这是一种将集成护理与远程监控相结合的医疗保健交付模型。方法。我们对511例晚期COPD患者或近期COPD加重患者进行了一项前瞻性、准随机临床试验,以测试主动iCare是否会影响以患者为中心的结果和医疗保健利用。患者被分配到主动iCare (n =352)或常规护理(n = 159),并使用St. Georges呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、症状、基于指南的护理和医疗保健利用来检查生活质量的变化。发现。与常规护理相比,主动iCare在3、6和9个月时将总SGRQ提高了7-9个单位(p<0.0001),将症状SGRQ提高了9个单位(p<0.0001),将活动SGRQ提高了6-7个单位(p<0.001),将影响SGRQ提高了7-11个单位(p<0.0001)。主动iCare使6分钟步行距离增加了40米(p<0.001),每100名受试者减少了76次与copd相关的紧急办公室就诊(p<0.0001),识别了未报告的加重,并减少了吸烟(p = 0.01)。主动iCare对咳嗽、痰液、呼吸短促、BODE指数和氧滴定也有改善作用(p<0.05)。主动iCare组的死亡率(1.1%)与常规护理组的死亡率(3.8%;P = 0.08)。解释。结果表明,将综合护理与远程监测相结合可以改善晚期COPD患者的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Eosinophil Count Stability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a High Endemic Area of Parasitic Infection: A Prospective Study. Sexual Orientation Health Disparities in Chronic Respiratory Disorders. COPD: Iron Deficiency and Clinical Characteristics in Patients With and Without Chronic Respiratory Failure. Impact of Bronchiectasis on COPD Severity and Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency as a Risk Factor in Individuals with a Heavy Smoking History. Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Admissions, Health Status, and Behavioral Changes of Patients with COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1