Measurement of Human Work Reliability Using Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach and Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique Method

Bakhtiar Bakhtiar, S. Syukriah, M. Iqbal
{"title":"Measurement of Human Work Reliability Using Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach and Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique Method","authors":"Bakhtiar Bakhtiar, S. Syukriah, M. Iqbal","doi":"10.52088/ijesty.v2i1.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CV. Raja Hati is a company that is engaged in the process of refinishing tires that have been bald into new ones. The tire retreading process has a relatively high percentage of defects, such as 14.8% Printing Process, 12.3% Surface Leveling, 8.6% Tire Curing, and so on. The problems in this study are the factors that cause defects in terms of human aspects, the types of errors that most often occur in the production process, and the value of human error probability (HEP) in the production process at CV. Raja Hati. This study aims to determine the factors that cause defects in terms of human aspects, the types of errors that most often occur in the production process and the value of human error probability (HEP) in the production process. The research was conducted using the SHERPA and HEART methods. The SHERPA method’s study results show that the types of errors that often occur in the tire retreading process are many wrong operator actions. Still, on the proper object (A7), the operator is wrong in dividing the time in doing work (A2), and the operator is not suitable for doing his job (A5). This study concludes that the factors that cause product defects in the tire retreading process are the absence of a procedure for correcting errors by 21.63%, the need for different techniques in doing work to facilitate operators by 27.04%, inexperienced operators by 12.36%, and inexperience and independent inspection has a percentage of 12.36%. The results of the calculation of the HEP value show that the average HEP value in the tire retreading process is 0.8552 or 85.52%, while the operator reliability value is 14.48%.","PeriodicalId":14149,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v2i1.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CV. Raja Hati is a company that is engaged in the process of refinishing tires that have been bald into new ones. The tire retreading process has a relatively high percentage of defects, such as 14.8% Printing Process, 12.3% Surface Leveling, 8.6% Tire Curing, and so on. The problems in this study are the factors that cause defects in terms of human aspects, the types of errors that most often occur in the production process, and the value of human error probability (HEP) in the production process at CV. Raja Hati. This study aims to determine the factors that cause defects in terms of human aspects, the types of errors that most often occur in the production process and the value of human error probability (HEP) in the production process. The research was conducted using the SHERPA and HEART methods. The SHERPA method’s study results show that the types of errors that often occur in the tire retreading process are many wrong operator actions. Still, on the proper object (A7), the operator is wrong in dividing the time in doing work (A2), and the operator is not suitable for doing his job (A5). This study concludes that the factors that cause product defects in the tire retreading process are the absence of a procedure for correcting errors by 21.63%, the need for different techniques in doing work to facilitate operators by 27.04%, inexperienced operators by 12.36%, and inexperience and independent inspection has a percentage of 12.36%. The results of the calculation of the HEP value show that the average HEP value in the tire retreading process is 0.8552 or 85.52%, while the operator reliability value is 14.48%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于系统人为误差减少与预测方法和人为误差评估与减少技术方法的人力工作可靠性测量
简历。Raja Hati是一家从事将轮胎翻新成新轮胎的公司。轮胎翻新工艺的缺陷率比较高,如印刷工艺14.8%、表面流平12.3%、轮胎固化8.6%等。本文研究的问题是人为方面的缺陷因素,生产过程中最常发生的错误类型,以及生产过程中人为错误概率(HEP)在CV上的值。拉贾Hati。本研究旨在从人为方面确定导致缺陷的因素,生产过程中最常发生的错误类型以及生产过程中人为错误概率(HEP)的值。本研究采用SHERPA和HEART方法进行。SHERPA方法的研究结果表明,轮胎翻新过程中经常发生的错误类型是许多错误的操作动作。然而,在适当的对象(A7)上,操作员在工作(A2)上划分时间是错误的,操作员不适合做他的工作(A5)。本研究得出在轮胎翻新过程中导致产品缺陷的因素为:缺乏纠正错误的程序(21.63%),操作人员在工作中需要不同的技术以方便操作人员(27.04%),操作人员缺乏经验(12.36%),缺乏经验和独立检查(12.36%)。HEP值的计算结果表明,轮胎翻新过程的平均HEP值为0.8552或85.52%,而操作员可靠性值为14.48%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compatibility Analysis of Metolachlor and Pendimethalin for Weed Control in Arabica Coffee Plants Web-Based Math Braille Translator Using Indonesian Braille Symbols Comparison of the Results of the Edas and Vikor Methods in the Decision Support System for KIP Scholarship Recipients at Malikussaleh University Android-Based Drug Information Application Using Augmented Reality Technology Cosmetic Shop Sentiment Analysis on TikTok Shop Using the Support Vector Machine Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1