Affordances and Information Systems Research: Taking Stock and Moving Forward

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Data Base for Advances in Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.1145/3595863.3595867
Mostafa Mesgari, K. Mohajeri, Bijan Azad
{"title":"Affordances and Information Systems Research: Taking Stock and Moving Forward","authors":"Mostafa Mesgari, K. Mohajeri, Bijan Azad","doi":"10.1145/3595863.3595867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term affordance appears with increasing frequency in the Information Systems (IS) literature. Nevertheless, those who study information technologies/information systems (IT/IS) via the affordance lens often have different views about its origin, meaning, and appropriate application in IS research. In turn, not spelling out the related assumptions and boundaries inherent in these diverse views may have hindered a wider and more cumulative adoption of the affordance lens in IS research. This paper offers a potential solution by (1) synthesizing the ecological psychology literature to suggest five key modules of the affordance concept relevant to IS research and (2) taking stock of IS research that has employed the affordance concept and classifying it according to its focus on three key affordance elements: IT artifact, user, and context. Finally, this paper presents a set of challenges, opportunities, and recommendations regarding how IS researchers can advance affordance-based research in the field.","PeriodicalId":46842,"journal":{"name":"Data Base for Advances in Information Systems","volume":"17 1","pages":"29 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Base for Advances in Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3595863.3595867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The term affordance appears with increasing frequency in the Information Systems (IS) literature. Nevertheless, those who study information technologies/information systems (IT/IS) via the affordance lens often have different views about its origin, meaning, and appropriate application in IS research. In turn, not spelling out the related assumptions and boundaries inherent in these diverse views may have hindered a wider and more cumulative adoption of the affordance lens in IS research. This paper offers a potential solution by (1) synthesizing the ecological psychology literature to suggest five key modules of the affordance concept relevant to IS research and (2) taking stock of IS research that has employed the affordance concept and classifying it according to its focus on three key affordance elements: IT artifact, user, and context. Finally, this paper presents a set of challenges, opportunities, and recommendations regarding how IS researchers can advance affordance-based research in the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能支持和信息系统研究:评估和前进
在信息系统(IS)文献中,“可视性”一词出现的频率越来越高。然而,那些从信息学角度研究信息技术/信息系统(IT/IS)的人往往对它的起源、意义以及在信息系统研究中的适当应用有不同的看法。反过来,没有阐明这些不同观点中固有的相关假设和界限,可能会阻碍在信息系统研究中更广泛、更累积地采用信息系统视角。本文提供了一个潜在的解决方案:(1)综合生态心理学文献,提出与信息系统研究相关的服务性概念的五个关键模块;(2)对使用服务性概念的信息系统研究进行评估,并根据其关注的三个关键服务性要素:it工件、用户和上下文对其进行分类。最后,本文提出了一系列挑战、机遇和建议,说明IS研究人员如何在该领域推进基于能力的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data Base for Advances in Information Systems
Data Base for Advances in Information Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Four Decades of Chief Information Officer Research: A Literature Review and Research Agenda Based on Main Path Analysis The Role of Social Media Analytics in Providing Product Intelligence: A Qualitative Study A Design Theory for Certification Presentations Unpacking Human and AI Complementarity: Insights from Recent Works Let's Quit Together: Exploring Textual Factors Promoting Supportive Interactions in Online Cannabis Support Forums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1