Paternal and joint parental occupational pesticide exposure and spina bifida in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997 to 2002.

S. Pettigrew, E. Bell, Alissa R Van Zutphen, Carissa M Rocheleau, G. Shaw, P. Romitti, A. Olshan, P. Lupo, A. Soim, Jennifer A. Makelarski, Adrian M. Michalski, W. Sanderson
{"title":"Paternal and joint parental occupational pesticide exposure and spina bifida in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997 to 2002.","authors":"S. Pettigrew, E. Bell, Alissa R Van Zutphen, Carissa M Rocheleau, G. Shaw, P. Romitti, A. Olshan, P. Lupo, A. Soim, Jennifer A. Makelarski, Adrian M. Michalski, W. Sanderson","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nBecause of persistent concerns over the association between pesticides and spina bifida, we examined the role of paternal and combined parental occupational pesticide exposures in spina bifida in offspring using data from a large population-based study of birth defects.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOccupational information from fathers of 291 spina bifida cases and 2745 unaffected live born control infants with estimated dates of delivery from 1997 to 2002 were collected by means of maternal report. Two expert industrial hygienists estimated exposure intensity and frequency to insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for exposure to any pesticide and to any class of pesticide (yes/no; and by median), and exposure to combinations of pesticides (yes/no) and risk of spina bifida. Adjusted odds ratios were also estimated by parent exposed to pesticides (neither, mother only, father only, both parents).\n\n\nRESULTS\nJoint parental occupational pesticide exposure was positively associated with spina bifida (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.4) when compared with infants with neither maternal nor paternal exposures; a similar association was not observed when only one parent was exposed. There was a suggested positive association between combined paternal insecticide and fungicide exposures and spina bifida (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-2.8), however, nearly all other aORs were close to unity.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOverall, there was little evidence paternal occupational pesticide exposure was associated with spina bifida. However, the small numbers make it difficult to precisely evaluate the role of pesticide classes, individually and in combination. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:963-971, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

BACKGROUND Because of persistent concerns over the association between pesticides and spina bifida, we examined the role of paternal and combined parental occupational pesticide exposures in spina bifida in offspring using data from a large population-based study of birth defects. METHODS Occupational information from fathers of 291 spina bifida cases and 2745 unaffected live born control infants with estimated dates of delivery from 1997 to 2002 were collected by means of maternal report. Two expert industrial hygienists estimated exposure intensity and frequency to insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for exposure to any pesticide and to any class of pesticide (yes/no; and by median), and exposure to combinations of pesticides (yes/no) and risk of spina bifida. Adjusted odds ratios were also estimated by parent exposed to pesticides (neither, mother only, father only, both parents). RESULTS Joint parental occupational pesticide exposure was positively associated with spina bifida (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.9-2.4) when compared with infants with neither maternal nor paternal exposures; a similar association was not observed when only one parent was exposed. There was a suggested positive association between combined paternal insecticide and fungicide exposures and spina bifida (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8-2.8), however, nearly all other aORs were close to unity. CONCLUSION Overall, there was little evidence paternal occupational pesticide exposure was associated with spina bifida. However, the small numbers make it difficult to precisely evaluate the role of pesticide classes, individually and in combination. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:963-971, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1997年至2002年国家出生缺陷预防研究中父亲和父母共同职业农药暴露与脊柱裂的关系。
背景:由于人们一直关注农药与脊柱裂之间的关系,我们利用一项基于大量人口的出生缺陷研究的数据,研究了父亲和父母联合职业农药暴露在后代脊柱裂中的作用。方法采用产妇报告法收集1997 ~ 2002年291例脊柱裂病例和2745例正常活产对照婴儿的父亲职业信息。两位工业卫生专家估计了杀虫剂、除草剂和杀菌剂的暴露强度和频率。多变量logistic回归模型用于估计暴露于任何农药和任何类别农药的调整优势比(aOR)和95%置信区间(CI)(是/否;以及暴露于农药组合(是/否)和脊柱裂的风险。调整后的优势比也通过父母接触杀虫剂(没有,只有母亲,只有父亲,父母双方)来估计。结果父母联合职业农药暴露与脊柱裂呈正相关(aOR, 1.5;95% CI, 0.9-2.4),与母亲和父亲均未暴露的婴儿相比;当只有一方父母受到辐射时,没有观察到类似的关联。父亲杀虫剂和杀菌剂联合暴露与脊柱裂呈正相关(aOR, 1.5;95% CI, 0.8-2.8),然而,几乎所有其他aor都接近一致。结论总体而言,没有证据表明父亲职业农药暴露与脊柱裂有关。然而,由于数量少,很难准确评估农药类别的作用,无论是单独的还是组合的。出生缺陷研究(A辑)106:963-971,2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Image Corrigendum for: Levels of folate receptor autoantibodies in maternal and cord blood and risk of neural tube defects in a Chinese population, 106:685–695 (10.1002/bdra.23517) Acardiac twin pregnancies part III: Model simulations. Diprosopus: Systematic review and report of two cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1