Does regional trade integration reinforce or weaken capital mobility? New evidence from four free trade areas

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Economics and Business Review Pub Date : 2023-08-28 DOI:10.18559/ebr.2023.3.795
M. Ganić, Amila Novalic
{"title":"Does regional trade integration reinforce or weaken capital mobility? New evidence from four free trade areas","authors":"M. Ganić, Amila Novalic","doi":"10.18559/ebr.2023.3.795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study aims to empirically determine whether a higher level of trade openness and the presence of better legal protection for investors enhances the impact of trade bloc membership on capital mobility based on four trading blocs: Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Central American and Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTADR), Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA), and the Pacific Alliance. This study employs the fully modified and dynamic ordinary least squares estimators and a panel quantile regression cointegration estimator. The study finds that a country’s affiliation with a trade bloc improves capital mobility in the whole group and EAEU region, low capital mobility in the Pacific Alliance region and moderate low capital mobility in the CAFTA-DR region. The legal protection system alone provided for the investors does not improve the level of capital mobility unless its interaction with investment is included. Also the study reveals that high trade openness does not necessarily lead to better capital mobility for the studied trade blocs.","PeriodicalId":41557,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.3.795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The study aims to empirically determine whether a higher level of trade openness and the presence of better legal protection for investors enhances the impact of trade bloc membership on capital mobility based on four trading blocs: Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Central American and Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTADR), Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA), and the Pacific Alliance. This study employs the fully modified and dynamic ordinary least squares estimators and a panel quantile regression cointegration estimator. The study finds that a country’s affiliation with a trade bloc improves capital mobility in the whole group and EAEU region, low capital mobility in the Pacific Alliance region and moderate low capital mobility in the CAFTA-DR region. The legal protection system alone provided for the investors does not improve the level of capital mobility unless its interaction with investment is included. Also the study reveals that high trade openness does not necessarily lead to better capital mobility for the studied trade blocs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域贸易一体化是加强还是削弱资本流动?来自四个自由贸易区的新证据
本文以欧亚经济联盟(EAEU)、中美洲和多米尼加共和国自由贸易协定(CAFTADR)、中欧自由贸易协定(CEFTA)和太平洋联盟四个贸易集团为研究对象,实证研究了较高的贸易开放水平和更好的投资者法律保护是否会增强贸易集团成员对资本流动的影响。本研究采用完全修正的动态普通最小二乘估计量和面板分位数回归协整估计量。研究发现,一个国家加入一个贸易集团可以提高整个集团和EAEU地区的资本流动性,太平洋联盟地区的资本流动性较低,CAFTA-DR地区的资本流动性较低。除非将其与投资的相互作用包括在内,否则仅为投资者提供的法律保护制度并不能提高资本流动的水平。研究还表明,高贸易开放度并不一定会导致所研究的贸易集团更好的资本流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proposal for a comprehensive retirement insurance solution (CRIS) to mitigate retirement risk based on theory of change Enhancing garbage fee compliance: Insights from a Slovak municipality Taxation of public pensions in European Union countries Personal bankruptcy prediction using machine learning techniques Examining the performance of Shari’ah‑compliant versus conventional stock indexes: A comparative analysis pre-, during, and post-COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1