The Obstetric outcomes associated with advanced maternal age at the University Teaching Hospitals Women and Newborn Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia

Felix Simute, L. Kasonka, B. Vwalika
{"title":"The Obstetric outcomes associated with advanced maternal age at the University Teaching Hospitals Women and Newborn Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia","authors":"Felix Simute, L. Kasonka, B. Vwalika","doi":"10.55320/mjz.48.3.894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pregnant women aged 35 years and above have traditionally been termed as of advanced maternal age. These women are considered to have a higher incidence of obstetric complications than younger ones \nObjectives: To investigate socio-demographic characteristics and obstetric outcomes in women of advanced age who delivered at the Women and Newborn Hospital, in Lusaka, Zambia. \nMethods: This was a cross-sectional study in which a total of 226 postnatal women, both of advanced (35 years and above) and optimal age (20 - 34 years), that met the eligibility criteria were recruited. Systematic random sampling was used to recruit study participants and data was collected using a structured questionnaire, review of patient's hospital records, and the labour ward delivery registers. Statistical analysis was performed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 26 software. \nResults: The prevalence of advanced maternal age was 14.1%. The mean ages were 38years (range 35 - 46 years) and 28 years in advanced and optimal maternal age groups respectively. Socio­ demographic characteristics that were found to be significantly associated with advanced maternal age included; education (P=0.036), occupation (P= 0.015), the cultural belief of large families (P=0.003), and contraception use (P= 0.001). There were more married women among advanced age women 105 (92.9%) than among optimal age women 99 (87.2%), however, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.262). Divorce (P=0.689), income (P=0.701), and history of subfertility P=0.291) were also not found to be different between the two groups. With regards to maternal outcomes, advanced maternal age was significantly associated with severe pre­ eclampsia (AOR 2.131; 95% CI 1.190 - 3.816; P=0.011), postpartum haemorrhage (AOR 1.400; 95% CI 0.187 - 0.855; P=0.018), caesarean deliveries (AOR 1.395; 95% CI 1.115 - 4.719; P=0.028) and antepartum haemorrhage (AOR 2.425; 95% CI 1.029 - 5.714; P=0.043). On foetal outcomes, advanced maternal age was significantly associated with NICU admissions (AOR 3.075; 95% CI 1.298 - 7.287; P=0.011). However, there was no association with APGAR score at 5 minutes (P=0.174), birth weight (P=l.000), gestation age at birth (P=0.676), and PROM (P=0.557) \nConclusion: Generally, women of advanced maternal age were associated with more adverse obstetric outcomes than women of optimal childbearing age. Hence, there is a need to sensitise these women and their spouses on the risk of advanced maternal age on obstetric outcomes and the need for not postponing conception until the late 3rd decade of life.","PeriodicalId":74149,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal of Zambia","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal of Zambia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55320/mjz.48.3.894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnant women aged 35 years and above have traditionally been termed as of advanced maternal age. These women are considered to have a higher incidence of obstetric complications than younger ones Objectives: To investigate socio-demographic characteristics and obstetric outcomes in women of advanced age who delivered at the Women and Newborn Hospital, in Lusaka, Zambia. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which a total of 226 postnatal women, both of advanced (35 years and above) and optimal age (20 - 34 years), that met the eligibility criteria were recruited. Systematic random sampling was used to recruit study participants and data was collected using a structured questionnaire, review of patient's hospital records, and the labour ward delivery registers. Statistical analysis was performed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 26 software. Results: The prevalence of advanced maternal age was 14.1%. The mean ages were 38years (range 35 - 46 years) and 28 years in advanced and optimal maternal age groups respectively. Socio­ demographic characteristics that were found to be significantly associated with advanced maternal age included; education (P=0.036), occupation (P= 0.015), the cultural belief of large families (P=0.003), and contraception use (P= 0.001). There were more married women among advanced age women 105 (92.9%) than among optimal age women 99 (87.2%), however, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.262). Divorce (P=0.689), income (P=0.701), and history of subfertility P=0.291) were also not found to be different between the two groups. With regards to maternal outcomes, advanced maternal age was significantly associated with severe pre­ eclampsia (AOR 2.131; 95% CI 1.190 - 3.816; P=0.011), postpartum haemorrhage (AOR 1.400; 95% CI 0.187 - 0.855; P=0.018), caesarean deliveries (AOR 1.395; 95% CI 1.115 - 4.719; P=0.028) and antepartum haemorrhage (AOR 2.425; 95% CI 1.029 - 5.714; P=0.043). On foetal outcomes, advanced maternal age was significantly associated with NICU admissions (AOR 3.075; 95% CI 1.298 - 7.287; P=0.011). However, there was no association with APGAR score at 5 minutes (P=0.174), birth weight (P=l.000), gestation age at birth (P=0.676), and PROM (P=0.557) Conclusion: Generally, women of advanced maternal age were associated with more adverse obstetric outcomes than women of optimal childbearing age. Hence, there is a need to sensitise these women and their spouses on the risk of advanced maternal age on obstetric outcomes and the need for not postponing conception until the late 3rd decade of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院妇女和新生儿医院与高龄产妇相关的产科结果
引言:35岁及以上的孕妇传统上被称为高龄产妇。目的:调查在赞比亚卢萨卡妇女和新生儿医院分娩的高龄妇女的社会人口特征和产科结果。方法:这是一项横断面研究,共招募了226名符合资格标准的高龄(35岁及以上)和最佳年龄(20 - 34岁)的产后妇女。采用系统随机抽样方法招募研究参与者,并通过结构化问卷、查阅患者医院记录和产房分娩登记簿收集数据。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第26版软件进行统计分析。结果:高龄产妇患病率为14.1%。高龄产妇和最佳产妇年龄组的平均年龄分别为38岁(35 ~ 46岁)和28岁。被发现与高龄产妇显著相关的社会人口特征包括;教育程度(P=0.036)、职业(P= 0.015)、大家庭文化信仰(P=0.003)、避孕措施使用(P= 0.001)。高龄妇女105(92.9%)的已婚妇女多于最佳年龄妇女99(87.2%),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.262)。离婚(P=0.689)、收入(P=0.701)、低生育史(P= 0.291)在两组间也无差异。在产妇结局方面,高龄产妇与重度先兆子痫显著相关(AOR 2.131;95% ci 1.190 - 3.816;P=0.011)、产后出血(AOR 1.400;95% ci 0.187 - 0.855;P=0.018)、剖宫产(AOR 1.395;95% ci 1.115 - 4.719;P=0.028)和产前出血(AOR 2.425;95% ci 1.029 - 5.714;P = 0.043)。在胎儿结局方面,高龄产妇与新生儿重症监护病房入院显著相关(AOR 3.075;95% ci 1.298 - 7.287;P = 0.011)。然而,与5分钟APGAR评分(P=0.174)、出生体重(P= 1.000)、出生时胎龄(P=0.676)、胎膜早破(P=0.557)无关。结论:一般情况下,高龄产妇比最佳育龄妇女有更多的不良产科结局。因此,有必要提高这些妇女及其配偶对高龄产妇对产科结果的风险的认识,并且有必要不将受孕推迟到生命的第三个十年后期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Workplace experiences of diagnostic radiographers, on job satisfaction and staff retention in the public health sector in Lusaka District of Zambia Role Development and Extension for Radiographers in Computed Tomography: Literature Review Findings and their Application to Zimbabwe Role of Radiographers in the Provision of Diagnostic Medical Ultrasound Services in Zimbabwe: Past, Present and Way Forward Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of premature coronary artery disease; a case report of a 34-year-old male patient presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Gastrointestinal malignancies in Zambia: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1