Discussion of the Effect of Shut-In After Fracturing on Oil Recovery

Abstract

Water is accumulated near the fracture surface after fracturing, which will block oil flow out. The water blockage can be mitigated through the immediate well flow back or through shutting in the well before flow back. Which method is more effective? There are mixed results in the literature from field reports and experimental or simulation studies. This paper discussed the literature results and simulation data obtained from this study. It is found that the oil recovery mainly depends on the magnitude of pressure drawdown and the strength of imbibition. When the pressure drawdown is high, immediate flow back may lead to higher oil recovery than shutting in a well before flow back. When imbibition is strong, shutting in may be beneficial to enhance oil recovery through counter-current flow. Although many parameters of reservoir properties and operations may affect the shut-in effect, those parameters may be grouped into the pressure drawdown and imbibition strength. The parameters of matrix permeability, wettability, initial water saturation, and formation compressibility are discussed. Analysis and discussion of simulation data also suggest that the oil recovery is a linear function of pressure drawdown, but the relationship between oil recovery and capillary pressure is non-linear and more complex. The results and discussion from this study suggest that the immediate flow back may outperform the shut-in if a large pressure drawdown is applied. If a reservoir provides a strong imbibition condition, the shut-in may be beneficial. Surfactants may be chosen to enhance imbibition. The surfactants which alter the reservoir from oil-wet to water-wet may be preferred.