Prevalence of Staphylococci in Environmental Surfaces and Characterization of Isolates by Antibiotic Susceptibility

Charu Arjyal, P. Joshi, Divya Nepal, Rachana Kafle, Anuja Panthi, Radhika Thapa, P. Pandey
{"title":"Prevalence of Staphylococci in Environmental Surfaces and Characterization of Isolates by Antibiotic Susceptibility","authors":"Charu Arjyal, P. Joshi, Divya Nepal, Rachana Kafle, Anuja Panthi, Radhika Thapa, P. Pandey","doi":"10.3126/tujm.v8i1.41188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine the extent of staphylococcal contamination in various environmental sites and to characterize the isolates by antibiotic susceptibility.\nMethods: A cross-sectional study was conducted and 123 samples were collected from 9 different sites around Kathmandu valley. Isolation of S. aureus was done through cultural and biochemical analysis. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion test was employed to test the susceptibility of isolates to antibiotics.\nResults: A total of 25 S. aureus (20.33%) were isolated; among which 12 isolates exhibited methicillin resistance i.e. 48% (MRSA) and 13 isolates were methicillin susceptible, 52% (MSSA). Similarly, 53 Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) were isolated; among which 17(32.07%) were resistant to methicillin. The antibiotic resistance patterns of MRSA were reported as: erythromycin(n=2;16.6%.), clindamycin (n=2;16.6%), cotrimoxazole (n=2;16.6%), ciprofloxacin (n=2;16.6%) and gentamicin (n = 1;8.3%). MRCoNS showed high resistance to erythromycin (n=6; 35.2%), followed by co-trimoxazole (n=4; 23.5%), novobiocin (n=4; 23.5%) and ciprofloxacin (n=3; 17.6%). All MRSA and MRCoNS isolates were susceptible to linezolid and clindamycin.\nConclusion: This study reports relatively high prevalence of MRSA on environmental surfaces, pre-dominating in areas having heavy crowds. There may be a likely connection between humans and the environment to share MRSA and MSSA.","PeriodicalId":23254,"journal":{"name":"Tribhuvan University Journal of Microbiology","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribhuvan University Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/tujm.v8i1.41188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine the extent of staphylococcal contamination in various environmental sites and to characterize the isolates by antibiotic susceptibility. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted and 123 samples were collected from 9 different sites around Kathmandu valley. Isolation of S. aureus was done through cultural and biochemical analysis. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion test was employed to test the susceptibility of isolates to antibiotics. Results: A total of 25 S. aureus (20.33%) were isolated; among which 12 isolates exhibited methicillin resistance i.e. 48% (MRSA) and 13 isolates were methicillin susceptible, 52% (MSSA). Similarly, 53 Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) were isolated; among which 17(32.07%) were resistant to methicillin. The antibiotic resistance patterns of MRSA were reported as: erythromycin(n=2;16.6%.), clindamycin (n=2;16.6%), cotrimoxazole (n=2;16.6%), ciprofloxacin (n=2;16.6%) and gentamicin (n = 1;8.3%). MRCoNS showed high resistance to erythromycin (n=6; 35.2%), followed by co-trimoxazole (n=4; 23.5%), novobiocin (n=4; 23.5%) and ciprofloxacin (n=3; 17.6%). All MRSA and MRCoNS isolates were susceptible to linezolid and clindamycin. Conclusion: This study reports relatively high prevalence of MRSA on environmental surfaces, pre-dominating in areas having heavy crowds. There may be a likely connection between humans and the environment to share MRSA and MSSA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄球菌在环境表面的流行及药敏鉴定
目的:本研究的目的是确定葡萄球菌污染的程度在不同的环境场所,并通过抗生素敏感性表征分离。方法:采用横断面研究方法,在加德满都谷地9个不同地点采集123份样本。通过培养和生化分析分离金黄色葡萄球菌。采用Kirby-Bauer圆盘扩散试验检测菌株对抗生素的敏感性。结果:共分离到金黄色葡萄球菌25株,占20.33%;其中12株耐甲氧西林,占48% (MRSA); 13株甲氧西林敏感,占52% (MSSA)。同样,分离到53株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(con);其中耐甲氧西林17例(32.07%)。MRSA的耐药模式为:红霉素(n=2, 16.6%)、克林霉素(n=2, 16.6%)、复方新诺明(n=2, 16.6%)、环丙沙星(n=2, 16.6%)和庆大霉素(n= 1, 8.3%)。mrcon对红霉素有高耐药性(n=6;35.2%),其次是复方新诺明(n=4;23.5%),新生物素(n=4;23.5%)和环丙沙星(n=3;17.6%)。所有MRSA和MRCoNS分离株均对利奈唑胺和克林霉素敏感。结论:本研究报告了MRSA在环境表面的较高流行率,在人群密集的地区占主导地位。人类和环境之间可能存在着共享MRSA和MSSA的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Increased risk of serious pneumococcal disease in patients with asthma
IF 14.2 1区 医学Journal of Allergy and Clinical ImmunologyPub Date : 2008-10-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.029
Young J. Juhn MD, MPH , Hirohito Kita MD , Barbara P. Yawn MD, MSc , Thomas G. Boyce MD, MPH , Kwang H. Yoo MD, PhD , Michaela E. McGree BS , Amy L. Weaver MS , Peter Wollan PhD , Robert M. Jacobson MD
Impact of comorbid asthma on severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19).
IF 3.8 3区 材料科学ACS Applied Electronic MaterialsPub Date : 2020-12-11 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77791-8
Sang Chul Lee, Kang Ju Son, Chang Hoon Han, Ji Ye Jung, Seon Cheol Park
Impact of Asthma on the Severity of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease
IF 14.2 1区 医学Journal of Allergy and Clinical ImmunologyPub Date : 2008-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.095
R.K. Dhillon , H. Kita , B.P. Yawn , M.E. Mc Gree , A.L. Weaver , K.H. Yoo , P. Wollan , T.G. Boyce , R.M. Jacobson , Y.J. Juhn
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Access among Economics Students: In Terms of Material Access Reversal of Anthropocentric Worldview in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake Effect of Cooperative Membership on Performance of Farmers: Evidence of Cereal Farmers from Plain Region (Terai) of Nepal Convergence of Infinite Product by Schlömilch's Method Human Resource Development and Employee Engagement in Nepalese Development Banks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1