ISO 9001:2015: the view from the conformity assessment community

IF 3.6 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Total Quality Management & Business Excellence Pub Date : 2022-05-07 DOI:10.1080/14783363.2022.2073212
Luís Fonseca, Jose Pedro Teixeira Domingues, Henriqueta Nóvoa, Paul Simpson, Joana dos Guimarães Sá
{"title":"ISO 9001:2015: the view from the conformity assessment community","authors":"Luís Fonseca, Jose Pedro Teixeira Domingues, Henriqueta Nóvoa, Paul Simpson, Joana dos Guimarães Sá","doi":"10.1080/14783363.2022.2073212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research evaluates the perceptions from the conformity assessment community regarding the auditability of ISO 9001:2015 and the perception of its ease of use by the audited organisations. The study is supported on a survey promoted by the Strategic, Planning and Operations Task Group (SPOTG) of Subcommittee 2 of ISO TC 176 (TC 176/SC2) aiming at collect insights on using the standard and identify any need for future revisions. As an overall conclusion, in the view of certification bodies’ auditors, programme managers and certification decision-makers, ISO 9001:2015 attained its main objectives. Nevertheless, it is suggested in the forthcoming ISO 9001 review cycle to adopt a more simplified language and to improve the ease of understanding and consistency of interpretations of the ISO 9001:2015 requirements. Additionally, suggestions for making clauses (e.g. 4.1. Understanding the organisation and its context, 6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities, 7.1.6 Organisational Knowledge, and 4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties) easier to apply and improving its auditability have also been identified.","PeriodicalId":23149,"journal":{"name":"Total Quality Management & Business Excellence","volume":"111 1","pages":"558 - 579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Total Quality Management & Business Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2073212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This research evaluates the perceptions from the conformity assessment community regarding the auditability of ISO 9001:2015 and the perception of its ease of use by the audited organisations. The study is supported on a survey promoted by the Strategic, Planning and Operations Task Group (SPOTG) of Subcommittee 2 of ISO TC 176 (TC 176/SC2) aiming at collect insights on using the standard and identify any need for future revisions. As an overall conclusion, in the view of certification bodies’ auditors, programme managers and certification decision-makers, ISO 9001:2015 attained its main objectives. Nevertheless, it is suggested in the forthcoming ISO 9001 review cycle to adopt a more simplified language and to improve the ease of understanding and consistency of interpretations of the ISO 9001:2015 requirements. Additionally, suggestions for making clauses (e.g. 4.1. Understanding the organisation and its context, 6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities, 7.1.6 Organisational Knowledge, and 4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties) easier to apply and improving its auditability have also been identified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ISO 9001:2015:合格评定界的观点
本研究评估了合格评定界对ISO 9001:2015可审核性的看法,以及被审核组织对其易用性的看法。该研究得到了ISO tc176 (TC 176/SC2)第二小组委员会战略、规划和运营任务组(SPOTG)推动的一项调查的支持,该调查旨在收集使用该标准的见解,并确定未来修订的任何需求。总的来说,在认证机构的审核员、项目经理和认证决策者看来,ISO 9001:2015达到了其主要目标。尽管如此,建议在即将到来的ISO 9001审核周期中采用更简化的语言,并提高对ISO 9001:2015要求解释的易用性和一致性。此外,对条款的制定建议(如4.1. 1)。了解组织及其背景、6.1应对风险和机遇的行动、7.1.6组织知识和4.2了解相关方的需求和期望)更容易应用和改进其可审核性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Total Quality Management & Business Excellence is an international journal which sets out to stimulate thought and research in all aspects of total quality management and to provide a natural forum for discussion and dissemination of research results. The journal is designed to encourage interest in all matters relating to total quality management and is intended to appeal to both the academic and professional community working in this area. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence is the culture of an organization committed to customer satisfaction through continuous improvement. This culture varies both from one country to another and between different industries, but has certain essential principles which can be implemented to secure greater market share, increased profits and reduced costs. The journal provides up-to-date research, consultancy work and case studies right across the whole field including quality culture, quality strategy, quality systems, tools and techniques of total quality management and the implementation in both the manufacturing and service sectors. No topics relating to total quality management are excluded from consideration in order to develop business excellence.
期刊最新文献
Does social media contribute to research impact? An Altmetric study of highly-cited marketing research A survey on ISO 9001 decertified companies: the three stages leading to withdrawal Cloud PLM adoption: a multiple perspectives approach Effects of perceived benefit on online rental service customer behavior Effect of top management team attention to digital transformation on innovation activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1