Acute Pesticide Poisoning Case Registration in Uganda’s Health Care Facilities

D. Sekabojja, A. Atuhaire, Nabankema, D. Sekimpi, C. Bainomugisa, E. Jørs
{"title":"Acute Pesticide Poisoning Case Registration in Uganda’s Health Care Facilities","authors":"D. Sekabojja, A. Atuhaire, Nabankema, D. Sekimpi, C. Bainomugisa, E. Jørs","doi":"10.4172/2161-0525.10001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Over the years, synthetic pesticides use in Uganda has been on the rise mainly in combating pests, disease pathogens, and disease vectors, both in agriculture and public health. Although there is an increased import and use, the limited user knowledge has resulted into exposure to the toxic products causing both intentional and non-intentional poisonings. This study evaluates a simple tool to register acute pesticide poisoning cases in selected community health facilities. \nMethod: In 2013, a total of 66 health care workers from 66 health facilities serving a population of 367,169 and 2.007 million in Pallisa and Wakiso districts respectively were trained on diagnosis, treatment, registration and reporting of acute pesticide poisoning. In addition over 250 members of Village Health Teams were trained to sensitise and refer any victims of pesticide poisoning to nearby health care facilities. Thereafter 1300 copies of case registration forms were distributed to trained health care workers in the 66 health facilities to capture attributes to pesticide poisonings including; patient demographic information, name of poisoning agent, type of poisoning exposure, observed signs and symptoms by patient, first aid/treatment administered, outcome of poisoning or referral to a higher facility. Partnering health facilities were visited on a monthly basis to collect filled forms and discuss any upcoming challenges. Also a feedback meeting with the health facility in charge were organised on a quarterly basis to rectify the data collection challenges. Collected data was entered, cleaned and analysed using Stata/SE14.0 Statistical package and graphs constructed with MS. Excel 13. A total of 393 acute pesticide poisoning cases were registered in 43/66 health facilities in a period of 5 years (2013-2017), with an annual average of 78.6 cases and 65.2% reporting. The mean age was 20.6 years (SD ± 17.4 years). Male cases were significantly older than females (p 30 years, 127/393 (32.3%). A majority of 215/393 (54.7%) cases were non-intentional poisoning of which 37/215 (17.2%) were occupational poisoning cases and 178/215 (82.8%) accidental poisoning cases, while 82/393 (20.9%) were intentional poisonings and the rest 96/393 (24.4%) listed among others. The health workers faced a challenge of inability to obtain names of pesticides that caused majority 301/393 (76.6%). However, known registered poisonings 58/393 (14.8%) by chemical group included; majority being Organophosphates 29/58 (50.0%), followed by Rodenticides (Coumarin & metal phosphide) 11/58 (19.0%), Pyrethroids 7/58 (12.1%), Phosphonates 5/58 (8.6%), Acaricides 3/58 (5.2%), Carbamates 1/58 (1.7%), Thiocarbamate 1/58 (1.7%) and phenoxy acids 1/58 (1.7%). \nConclusion: Acute Pesticides Poisoning (APP) is an on-going health challenge that has not been prioritised yet by the country’s health sector. Organophosphate poisoning is the major cause of the poisonings. A majority of the poisonings were accidental poisonings seen in young age groups, followed by self-harm and occupational poisonings. This pilot serves as a guide for the country to build a robust pesticide poisoning surveillance system and pesticide access control mechanisms from end user to treatment facilities.","PeriodicalId":15742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental and Analytical Toxicology","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental and Analytical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0525.10001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Over the years, synthetic pesticides use in Uganda has been on the rise mainly in combating pests, disease pathogens, and disease vectors, both in agriculture and public health. Although there is an increased import and use, the limited user knowledge has resulted into exposure to the toxic products causing both intentional and non-intentional poisonings. This study evaluates a simple tool to register acute pesticide poisoning cases in selected community health facilities. Method: In 2013, a total of 66 health care workers from 66 health facilities serving a population of 367,169 and 2.007 million in Pallisa and Wakiso districts respectively were trained on diagnosis, treatment, registration and reporting of acute pesticide poisoning. In addition over 250 members of Village Health Teams were trained to sensitise and refer any victims of pesticide poisoning to nearby health care facilities. Thereafter 1300 copies of case registration forms were distributed to trained health care workers in the 66 health facilities to capture attributes to pesticide poisonings including; patient demographic information, name of poisoning agent, type of poisoning exposure, observed signs and symptoms by patient, first aid/treatment administered, outcome of poisoning or referral to a higher facility. Partnering health facilities were visited on a monthly basis to collect filled forms and discuss any upcoming challenges. Also a feedback meeting with the health facility in charge were organised on a quarterly basis to rectify the data collection challenges. Collected data was entered, cleaned and analysed using Stata/SE14.0 Statistical package and graphs constructed with MS. Excel 13. A total of 393 acute pesticide poisoning cases were registered in 43/66 health facilities in a period of 5 years (2013-2017), with an annual average of 78.6 cases and 65.2% reporting. The mean age was 20.6 years (SD ± 17.4 years). Male cases were significantly older than females (p 30 years, 127/393 (32.3%). A majority of 215/393 (54.7%) cases were non-intentional poisoning of which 37/215 (17.2%) were occupational poisoning cases and 178/215 (82.8%) accidental poisoning cases, while 82/393 (20.9%) were intentional poisonings and the rest 96/393 (24.4%) listed among others. The health workers faced a challenge of inability to obtain names of pesticides that caused majority 301/393 (76.6%). However, known registered poisonings 58/393 (14.8%) by chemical group included; majority being Organophosphates 29/58 (50.0%), followed by Rodenticides (Coumarin & metal phosphide) 11/58 (19.0%), Pyrethroids 7/58 (12.1%), Phosphonates 5/58 (8.6%), Acaricides 3/58 (5.2%), Carbamates 1/58 (1.7%), Thiocarbamate 1/58 (1.7%) and phenoxy acids 1/58 (1.7%). Conclusion: Acute Pesticides Poisoning (APP) is an on-going health challenge that has not been prioritised yet by the country’s health sector. Organophosphate poisoning is the major cause of the poisonings. A majority of the poisonings were accidental poisonings seen in young age groups, followed by self-harm and occupational poisonings. This pilot serves as a guide for the country to build a robust pesticide poisoning surveillance system and pesticide access control mechanisms from end user to treatment facilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达卫生保健机构的急性农药中毒病例登记
背景:多年来,乌干达合成农药的使用一直在增加,主要用于防治农业和公共卫生领域的害虫、疾病病原体和病媒。虽然进口和使用有所增加,但有限的用户知识导致接触有毒产品,造成有意和无意的中毒。本研究评估了在选定的社区卫生机构登记急性农药中毒病例的一种简单工具。方法:2013年,来自帕利萨县和瓦基索县66家卫生机构的66名卫生保健工作者接受了急性农药中毒的诊断、治疗、登记和报告培训,分别服务于36.7169万人和20.7万人。此外,250多名村卫生队成员接受了培训,以提高对农药中毒受害者的认识,并将他们转介到附近的保健设施。此后,向66个卫生设施的训练有素的卫生保健工作者分发了1300份病例登记表,以确定农药中毒的特征,包括;患者人口统计信息、中毒剂名称、中毒暴露类型、观察到的患者体征和症状、实施的急救/治疗、中毒的结果或转诊到更高的医疗机构。每月访问合作保健设施,收集填写的表格并讨论即将面临的挑战。此外,还每季度组织一次与负责保健设施的反馈会议,以纠正数据收集方面的挑战。使用Stata/SE14.0统计软件包输入、清理和分析收集到的数据,并使用MS. Excel 13构建图表。2013-2017年5年间,43/66家卫生机构共发生急性农药中毒393例,年均78.6例,报告率为65.2%。平均年龄20.6岁(SD±17.4岁)。男性病例明显大于女性(p 30岁,127/393(32.3%))。215/393例中,非故意中毒占多数(54.7%),其中职业中毒占37/215(17.2%),意外中毒占178/215(82.8%),故意中毒占82/393(20.9%),其他中毒占96/393(24.4%)。卫生工作者面临的挑战是无法获得杀虫剂的名称,造成大多数301/393(76.6%)。然而,按化学类别分类的已知登记中毒事件包括58/393 (14.8%);其次是杀鼠剂(香豆素和金属磷化物)11/58(19.0%)、拟除虫菊酯7/58(12.1%)、膦酸酯5/58(8.6%)、杀螨剂3/58(5.2%)、氨基甲酸酯1/58(1.7%)、硫氨基甲酸酯1/58(1.7%)和苯氧酸1/58(1.7%)。结论:急性农药中毒(APP)是一项持续存在的健康挑战,该国卫生部门尚未将其列为优先事项。有机磷中毒是中毒的主要原因。大多数中毒是发生在年轻年龄组的意外中毒,其次是自残和职业中毒。该试点为该国建立健全的农药中毒监测系统和从最终用户到处理设施的农药获取控制机制提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clarification of Mechanisms of Reactive Oxygen Species Generation from Mitochondria Hydrochar for Industrial Wastewater Treatment: An Overview on its Advantages and Applications Screening of Microbial Isolates from Petroleum Effluent Polluted Site and Optimization of Culture Conditions for Cellulase Production Permethrin and Cypermethrin Residues on Beans and Cucumber Plants Grown Under Greenhouse Conditions Analysis of Physicochemical Parameters of Drinking Water in Samunaber and Piazza district, Gondar Town
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1