Post-Crisis Reckoning: Making Sense of Early 21st-Century Civilizational Ruptures

Q3 Arts and Humanities Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.2478/ausp-2021-0001
György Kalmár
{"title":"Post-Crisis Reckoning: Making Sense of Early 21st-Century Civilizational Ruptures","authors":"György Kalmár","doi":"10.2478/ausp-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As the world is struggling with the Covid crisis and its numerous aftereffects, it is easy to forget that the present pandemic is only the latest of a whole series of paradigm-changing 21st-century crises. Indeed, the word “crisis” has become one of the key concepts for the understanding of the early 21st century. Thus, crisis seems very much to be the default position of the 21st century, the new norm. In this paper, I argue that the 21st century has a recognizably different cultural logic from what the previous one had: most of our social, ideological, political, financial, and ecological paradigms are either changing or will (or must) change soon. As most of our critical concepts, intellectual tools, and ideological frameworks were made during the boom years of the late 20th century, they are clearly outdated and inadequate today. Thus, in this paper, through taking account of these shifting intellectual and artistic paradigms, I attempt to indicate how the present crisis of knowledge and sense-making may be turned into a process of knowing and making sense of crisis, and thus help us meet the challenges of the new century. It is often through these fault-lines, breakdowns, and inconsistencies of our narratives that one may recognize those pre-crisis assumptions that we have to critically re-evaluate and update in order to understand the new century.1","PeriodicalId":37574,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract As the world is struggling with the Covid crisis and its numerous aftereffects, it is easy to forget that the present pandemic is only the latest of a whole series of paradigm-changing 21st-century crises. Indeed, the word “crisis” has become one of the key concepts for the understanding of the early 21st century. Thus, crisis seems very much to be the default position of the 21st century, the new norm. In this paper, I argue that the 21st century has a recognizably different cultural logic from what the previous one had: most of our social, ideological, political, financial, and ecological paradigms are either changing or will (or must) change soon. As most of our critical concepts, intellectual tools, and ideological frameworks were made during the boom years of the late 20th century, they are clearly outdated and inadequate today. Thus, in this paper, through taking account of these shifting intellectual and artistic paradigms, I attempt to indicate how the present crisis of knowledge and sense-making may be turned into a process of knowing and making sense of crisis, and thus help us meet the challenges of the new century. It is often through these fault-lines, breakdowns, and inconsistencies of our narratives that one may recognize those pre-crisis assumptions that we have to critically re-evaluate and update in order to understand the new century.1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机后的清算:21世纪早期文明断裂的意义
当世界正在与新冠肺炎危机及其众多后遗症作斗争时,人们很容易忘记,当前的大流行只是21世纪一系列改变范式的危机中最新的一次。事实上,“危机”一词已经成为理解21世纪初的关键概念之一。因此,危机似乎在很大程度上是21世纪的默认状态,是新的常态。在本文中,我认为21世纪的文化逻辑与上一个世纪明显不同:我们的大多数社会、意识形态、政治、金融和生态范式要么正在改变,要么将会(或必须)很快改变。由于我们的大多数批判性概念、智力工具和意识形态框架都是在20世纪末的繁荣时期形成的,它们在今天显然已经过时和不合适了。因此,在本文中,通过考虑这些变化的知识和艺术范式,我试图指出当前的知识和意义建构危机如何转变为认识和理解危机的过程,从而帮助我们迎接新世纪的挑战。正是通过这些断层线、崩溃和不一致的叙述,人们可能会认识到那些危机前的假设,我们必须批判性地重新评估和更新这些假设,以便理解新世纪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Series Philologica is published in cooperation with Sciendo by De Gruyter. Series Philologica publishes original, previously unpublished articles in the wide field of philological studies, and it is published in 3 issues a year (since 2014). The printed and online version of papers are identical.
期刊最新文献
Diasporic Imagination and Chronotopes Social Implications of Borrowings How Culture-Specific Practices and Values May Influence International (Romanian–South Korean) Marriages Political Discourse and Oppression – Influences on the Mentality and Culture of the Soviet Man Between Two Worlds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1