Sheath in Embryo Transfer. A Step Towards Improving Pregnancy Rate in ICSI Cycles

A. Galal, mohamed mehesen, Ahmad Etman, M. Elmohamady
{"title":"Sheath in Embryo Transfer. A Step Towards Improving Pregnancy Rate in ICSI Cycles","authors":"A. Galal, mohamed mehesen, Ahmad Etman, M. Elmohamady","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2022.143318.1179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare classic embryo transfer versus sheath in techniques of embryo transfer. Study Design: Retrospective case control. Materials and Methods: Retrospective case control that was conducted in Multicenter fertility centers. Four thousands one hundred and fifteen infertile women undergoing ICSI with 3110 underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1005 underwent frozen embryo transfer. Sheath in technique conducted by confident positioning of the outer sheath before introducing embryo loaded inner sheath while classic technique both catheters introduced simultaneously. Primary outcomes Clinical pregnancy rate (defined as the presence of pulsating fetal heart after 6-8 weeks of Embryo transfer) in both groups. Results: A total of 3110 embryo transfer were evaluated. in 1767 (56.8% ) classic embryo transfer method was used compared to 1343 (42.2% ) sheath in .The overall pregnancy rate is 50.8 % being 52.5 % within classic embryo transfer compared to 48.6 % within sheath in transfer that was statistically significant. Sheath in embryo transfer yield 51% pregnancy rate in non-difficult embryo transfer ( comparable to classic transfer ) and yield 43.3 % in difficult cases compared to failure of transfer with classic type .Pregnancy rate i8n frozen embryo transfer was significantly higher in sheath in group versus classic transfer (60.6 % versus 52.9%). Conclusion: Sheath in Embryo transfer is a valid technique yield comparable pregnancy rate in non-complicated cases and non-comparable higher pregnancy rate in difficult cases .it is simple a traumatic techniques easy to be standardized","PeriodicalId":12080,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","volume":"483 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2022.143318.1179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare classic embryo transfer versus sheath in techniques of embryo transfer. Study Design: Retrospective case control. Materials and Methods: Retrospective case control that was conducted in Multicenter fertility centers. Four thousands one hundred and fifteen infertile women undergoing ICSI with 3110 underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1005 underwent frozen embryo transfer. Sheath in technique conducted by confident positioning of the outer sheath before introducing embryo loaded inner sheath while classic technique both catheters introduced simultaneously. Primary outcomes Clinical pregnancy rate (defined as the presence of pulsating fetal heart after 6-8 weeks of Embryo transfer) in both groups. Results: A total of 3110 embryo transfer were evaluated. in 1767 (56.8% ) classic embryo transfer method was used compared to 1343 (42.2% ) sheath in .The overall pregnancy rate is 50.8 % being 52.5 % within classic embryo transfer compared to 48.6 % within sheath in transfer that was statistically significant. Sheath in embryo transfer yield 51% pregnancy rate in non-difficult embryo transfer ( comparable to classic transfer ) and yield 43.3 % in difficult cases compared to failure of transfer with classic type .Pregnancy rate i8n frozen embryo transfer was significantly higher in sheath in group versus classic transfer (60.6 % versus 52.9%). Conclusion: Sheath in Embryo transfer is a valid technique yield comparable pregnancy rate in non-complicated cases and non-comparable higher pregnancy rate in difficult cases .it is simple a traumatic techniques easy to be standardized
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胚胎移植中的鞘。提高ICSI周期妊娠率的一步
目的:比较经典胚胎移植和鞘胚胎移植技术。研究设计:回顾性病例对照。材料和方法:在多中心生育中心进行回顾性病例对照。41,500名不孕症妇女接受了ICSI,其中3110名接受了新鲜胚胎移植,1005名接受了冷冻胚胎移植。在引入胚胎加载的内鞘之前,先对外鞘进行自信定位,而经典技术是同时引入两种导管。两组的临床妊娠率(定义为胚胎移植后6-8周出现胎心搏动)。结果:共评估3110例胚胎移植。1767例(56.8%)采用经典胚胎移植法,1343例(42.2%)采用鞘内移植法。总体妊娠率为50.8%,其中经典胚胎移植法52.5%,鞘内移植法48.6%,差异有统计学意义。无困难胚胎移植的受孕率为51%(与经典移植相当),与经典移植失败的困难病例相比,受孕率为43.3%。冷冻胚胎移植中,鞘组的受孕率明显高于经典移植组(60.6%比52.9%)。结论:鞘内胚胎移植是一种有效的技术,在非复杂病例中妊娠率相当,在困难病例中妊娠率较高,操作简单,创伤性好,易于标准化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nuchal translucency in pregnant women beyond 35 years and its relation to congenital cardiac abnormalities: A cross-section study Histopathological evaluation of products of conception in sporadic and recurrent abortions The Effect of Adding Vaginal Progesterone to Oral Omega-3 Fatty Acids on the Birth Weight of Constitutionally Small for Gestational Age Fetuses: A Randomized Clinical Trial Efficacy and Safety of Paracervical Block in Reducing Intrauterine Device Insertion Related Pain : A Randomized Controlled Trial Study of the Changes of Pulsatility Index (PI) in Uterine Artery in Patients with Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1